Carl said:
Hi all
Is the windows xp sp2 firewall as good as the free zone alarm,or close to as
good.
I don't like to add all those extra programs if there is no significant
advantage.
Thanks
WinXP's built-in firewall is adequate at stopping incoming attacks,
and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's firewall does not
do, is give you any kind of alerts or other indication that it's working
or has blocked any attempted intrusions. It also does not protect you
from any Trojans or spyware that you (or someone else using your
computer) might download and install inadvertently. It doesn't monitor
out-going traffic at all, other than to check for IP-spoofing, much less
block (or at even ask you about) the bad or the questionable out-going
signals. It assumes that any application you have on your hard drive is
there because you want it there, and therefore has your "permission" to
access the Internet. Further, because the Windows Firewall is a
"stateful" firewall, it will also assume that any incoming traffic
that's a direct response to a Trojan's or spyware's out-going signal is
also authorized.
Description of a Personal Firewall
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321050
ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Sygate are all much better than WinXP's
built-in firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are
free versions of each readily available. Even the commercially
available Symantec's Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far,
although it does take a heavier toll of system performance then do
ZoneAlarm or Sygate.
--
Bruce Chambers
Help us help you:
You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH