C
Cosmo Brown
This is *trialware* From their site "use of the software is limited
and expires after a set period of time."
and expires after a set period of time."
S said:That just adds a new tab does not make the file windows themselves both
visible side-by-side, only makes the tabs visible side-by-side along the
top/bottom depending on preference, but thank-you for trying.
spoon2001 said:Agreed, and I don't think anything else I've seen is even close.
This is *trialware* From their site "use of the software is limited
and expires after a set period of time."
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:03:08 -0500, Larry Sabo
I think Total Commander is the best among all the dual-pane file
managers. The purists will yell and say - it's not a freeware! But it's
listed on ACF.
Why said:I think Total Commander is the best among all the dual-pane file
managers. The purists will yell and say - it's not a freeware!
For those who are interested, the dual-pane managers are also called
(OFM) orthodox file managers. There is an exhausted listing and
description about OMF at http://www.softpanorama.org/OFM/index.shtml
For those who are interested, the dual-pane managers are also called
(OFM) orthodox file managers. There is an exhausted listing and
description about OMF at http://www.softpanorama.org/OFM/index.shtml
The selling feature for me is the toolbar that lets you "bookmark"
icons for frequently visited files, folders and programs. Just click
on the icon and you're there. I've tried about a gazillion other file
managers, and only Power Desk has that option.
Howard said:Actually, there is a huge pile of DOS filemanagers that are feature rich,
work with long file names and I can not see any reason they would not
manage files as good or better than the windows based ones.
Some may not run under the dos emulation of win 2K and after, but this is
usually fixable with a third party emulator, like dosbox.
jacaranda said:The selling feature for me is the toolbar that lets you "bookmark" icons
for frequently visited files, folders and programs. Just click on the icon
and you're there. I've tried about a gazillion other file managers, and
only Power Desk has that option.
Nope. Not Freeware. Not listed. Apparently you didn't look at the web
page *either*.![]()
work with long file names and I can not see any reason they would not
manage files as good or better than the windows based ones.
quickest and easiest way to go to any directory (folder): Dos had several
popular utilities that keep a database of all directories on all disks.
YOu type a few letters, say tm for tmp, and the utility responds with a
menu of all directories that start with `tm'. You select one by key or
Individuals, who want to use TC at home but don't like paying for it,
therefore should convince their employer to license it.
I know there are many freeware or open source file managers to replace
windows explorer, but I want to know your opinions.
(one line)
Or obtain a full version which is sometimes available on (maybe only
German) computer magazine cover CDs, like on the c't 05/2005...
Howard said:Actually, every single windows based file manager lacks what I consider the
quickest and easiest way to go to any directory (folder): Dos had several
popular utilities that keep a database of all directories on all disks.
YOu type a few letters, say tm for tmp, and the utility responds with a
menu of all directories that start with `tm'. You select one by key or
mouse and, boom, you are there. If the letters define a directory uniquely,
you just go there without a menu.
So I wrote a batch file that uses the formerly popular DOS utility acd
(another change directory), to get the same results in windows. I hit a
key, type some letters at a prompt, and xplorer2 lite (the one I use)
goes right to the directory with my letters. The same technique can
probably be used with other windows file managers.
I believe I have a windows based utility (treesize or some such?) that
does something similar to acd.
Are you sure about that?! I don't remember a license for WC/TC *ever*
being on a cover disk. The c't 05/2005 didn't even have one...