Oops! I meant Microsoft Office 2000.
Anyway, I don't think Outlook is involved.
Is there some setting anywhere that I can change to get
all eleven digits?
-----Original Message-----
Outlook does not come with Windows XP. Outlook Express
does.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
I'm not at home now so can't give specific version of
Outlook but it came with Win XP installed March(?) 2004.
The number format is +1(nnn)nnn-nnnn (no spaces).
I have tried dragging a scanned document to the fax
printer, sending a note from Notepad (File..Print..),
etc.
I have used the address book and I have typed the number
in manually. Dialing rule: dial 1 + area code for
numbers
in and out of my area.
-----Original Message-----
Can't tell from here.
Verify your Fax software and Outlook version.
Verify the format of the number in the fax field.
State how you are sending the fax.
Specify your dialing rule.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
I have entered the number in international format and
several other ways. Dialing rules set to dial 1 + area
code. It consistently leaves out the '1' at the end of
the
prefix but if I change the prefix to '552-' it dials
the '2' and truncates the final digit. It does this
whether I use the address book or type in the number.
Maybe something in Outlook needs to be changed? I
THINK
I
am doing everything right but ...
-----Original Message-----
You must store your fax numbers in international
format,
then have a dialing
rule configured to specify how you want numbers
dialed.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx? scid=kb;en-
us;318575&Product=winxp
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Herman Curtis" <
[email protected]>
wrote
in message
I am using Win XP home. When I try to send a fax
only
ten
digits are dialed. 1(800)551-4321 is dialed
1800551432.
[These are fake numbers!] It does this with either
pulse
or tone dialing. I tried reentering the last four
digits
and it dialed them - but it left out the '1' in the
middle
of the string, still dialing only ten digits. I am
using
the address book. What am I doing wrong?
.
.
.