I absolutely realize that. I've done extensive reading on it in the last
week. I've also seen that it's almost an emotional issue for some the IEEE
diehards. I do it more as a privacy issue than a security issue (I have
WPA2-PSK with a VERY strong password). My community is outside of town, and
about half of the networks within range are not secured, and I just prefer to
not have mine be visible to the untrained naked eye. I now watch for
excessive traffic on my channel, and will change if the need ever arises.
My Dell Inspiron 1420 has a "Wireless Configuration Utility" that when I use
the "Site Monitor" function initially shows my network as (non-broadcasting),
but after it scans my channel a second time in it's cycle of scanning all
channels, shows my SSID. I'm going to delete my wireless profile to see if
that's the case when my computer doesn't auto-connect to my network.
I've seen and understand the rationale of "Not broadcasting your SSID from
the WAP, while every device emits frames that have it," but to the average
user, these things mean nothing. What I don't yet totally understand is that,
IF YOU HAVE PASSWORD PROTECTED FILE SHARING ENABLED AND VERIFY THAT YOU ARE
CONNECTED TO YOUR PRIVATE NETWORK, does non-broadcasting compromise the
security of your computers? From what I've read, it doesn't appear that it
does. I'm not concerned if someone actually sees the network, and then
encounters WPA2 and password protected file sharing.
As I stated, I'm considering changing my SSID broadcast option, but haven't
seen any compelling reason to do so, as long as other prudent security
measures are in place. Vista has connected without fail, whereas there are
occasional minor issues with XP, which is acceptable. It's a matter of
privacy (however limited it may be), not security. I would NEVER use NB SSID
as security, nor would I recommend it to anyone, ever. Thanks, Barb. My
favourite article on the subject was this one:
http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2007/10/16/myth-vs-reality-wireless-ssids.aspx