Peter,
I'll remind you that I admitted my own fallibility regarding poor spelling
("Being a notorious poor speller myself I am ...") in the first post of the
exchange, that you now call imagined, where you hurled the first insult "Are
there no courtesy requirements for being and MVP?" If this is a fight
between you and I then you picked it and you picked it then.
I participate in the newsgroup because despite your presence it pleases me.
I know what happens when one wrestles with a pig. Others may suffer your
arrogant behavior, biased opinions, and flat out wrong answers in silence,
but I choose to confront you. I will continue to do that even if it exposes
my own shortcomings until you either go away, change your behavior and
style, or until in pleases me to stop.
<For instance, by your reasoning, an appropriate answer to the question
"Does anyone know how to make my paragraph numbering start over with 1 after
a second
Heading 1?" would be "Yes."
Wrong again Peter. That may always be a true answer and in some
circumstances appropriate. However, in most cases, and particularly if the
responder knew (or could even concede the possibility) that the asker really
might want to know how to do what they asked then it would be a lot like
your answer to Kassy. Inappropriate and arrogant.
"What Kassy _wanted_ was a button to reach Equation Editor."
How do you know what Kassy really wanted? I know exactly what Kassy asked
and I can go back and see that in your snooty reply to Jay that you were
hoping Kassy would come back and tell us what he\she really wanted. If you
didn't really know then what makes your really know now?
In fact, it was clear to the rest of us that what Kassy wants is a
convenient way to get at Equation Editor.
Wrong again Peter. It wasn't even clear to you. Again, the rest of you can
all go back and see that in your snooty reply to Jay that you, at least, was
hoping Kassy would come back say what he\she really wanted.
While not infallible, I am reasonable capable of understanding the questions
asked. However, unlike you, when I don't I usually leave them to those who
do and I do not make it a habit to spin my answers in a manner that suits a
shortcoming in my abilities.
<If it's not (b), then how could it be [(a) or (b)]?
Yep, you nailed me. Guilty of carelessness again. Another fallibility.
I'll spend the rest of the evening in sack cloth and ashes.
Cheers,
--
Greg Maxey - Word MVP
My web site
http://gregmaxey.mvps.org
Peter,
Clearly an ass or not is another matter of opinion. As stated before.
I am not interested is exchanging insults with you.
Then why do you keep (this is the third time) hurling insults?
I don't have trouble distinguishing between the QAT and the Ribbon.
You do. Kassy asked if it was possible to add an icon to the Ribbon
and you went off nattering about adding a control to the QAT. It seems
Again I point out what a teacher is supposed to do. You claim you're
not interested in being a teacher. If you're not, why do you even
participate in this newsgroup?
Does it really not occur to you that the most helpful answer to a
question might be something other than the specific answer to the
specific wording of the question asked? For instance, by your
reasoning, an appropriate answer to the question "Does anyone know how
to make my paragraph numbering start over with 1 after a second
Heading 1?" would be "Yes."
What Kassy _wanted_ was a button to reach Equation Editor. Perhaps s/
he overlooked the pi button. Perhaps s/he, like many people, finds it
a pain to first click on a tab, then mouse all the way across the
screen to get to that button (whereas with the old-style menus, when
you click on the menu it's never more than a short slide down to the
desired command). The QAT makes that button more easily available.
Perhaps you haven't heard of ergonomics.
that you a) don't know the difference, b) can't read or comprehend the
question or c) in your typical arrogant manner you assumed that Kassy
didn't really want to add a icon to the Ribbon because it is too hard,
or not worth the effort, or he/she is incapable of mastering a new
skill.
Considering your impressive acedemic creditentials I think it is safe
to rule out (b). So which is it (a), (b) or both? I suspect both.
If it's not (b), then how could it be [(a) or (b)]?
In fact, it was clear to the rest of us that what Kassy wants is a
convenient way to get at Equation Editor. I offered two ways of doing
that. Your _only_ contribution to answering Kassy's question was to
repeat, about two days later, what I had already said.
The rest of your diatribe simply highlights and reinforces one of my
favorite annoyomous quotes:
"With Daniels, it is his belief in his own infallibility that is so
irritating. Even when obviously wrong he continues his arguments."
I'm not wrong about your inability to understand the questions being
asked, and I'm not wrong about your bizarre grudge-holding (which
seems to have originated in some imagined slight in response to some
original bit of nastiness), and I'm not wrong about what Kassy wanted
to know.
And you might try spell-checking your insults before clicking "Send."
<annoyomous>??