Judith said:
With these new big drives (my new box will have a 160 GB drive) and all the
improvements that have been made in hardware, is it still advisable to
partition the drive? Or will one big C: be just as good?
I recently researched Microsoft's website for the answer to this very
question. I found an article essentially saying that if a very large drive
(your 160 GB hard drive certainly qualifies, and my hard drive was even
bigger --250 GB) is formatted using NTFS, a partitioned hard drive will
perform 1 to 2 percent faster than a single huge volume, but virtually all of
the difference in performance is due to less fragmentation on the drive
containing mostly programs rather than data and temporary files. In other
words, if you regularly defragment your hard drive, you should notice
virtually no difference in performance at all between one huge unpartitioned
NTFS drive and a partitioned huge NTFS drive.
You are much more likely to see improved performance with partitioned drives
if you use FAT32 rather than NTFS. The reason is hypertechnical and has to
do with cluster sizes on FAT32 formatted drives -- the smaller the partition,
the smaller the default cluster size and therefore the more efficient Windows
becomes at storing files without wasting disk space. NTFS uses small cluster
sizes no matter how huge the hard drive is.
In any event, I never really understood the point of partitioning anyway.
For example, if I want to keep my data and downloaded programs on a separate
partition, I can just as easily store them on a separate external USB hard
drive and have the additional assurance that neither a virus nor a hard drive
failure on my primary hard drive will cause me to lose my data.
Ken