S
surface9
This is a little bit complicated, but, I guess I am missing some
fundamental step.
What I have is a PC with both SATA and IDE. My SATA drive has windows
XP installed and boots fine. My IDE drive is dockable (removable),
and, when it is not insterted, the PC boots to XP in the SATA drive.
When the IDE drive is inserted, then the PC will boot to it, where I
have Windows 2000 installed. My IDE drive actually has two partitons
on it, and the 2nd partition is set up to be the target of an xcopy
command that copies the entire contents of the SATA drive onto it
(using the switches /s/e/c/h/o/y). This works just fine for restoring
my SATA drive when it gets a virus or for any reason gets too
cluttered up. All I have to do is insert the IDE drive (and boot up
to windows 2000 on it), then I simply format the SATA drive, and then
xcopy from the 2nd partition of my IDE drive onto the SATA drive.
After that, I turn off my PC, eject the IDE drive, and boot to my SATA
drive, which boots just fine back to where it was when I originally
backed it up (to the 2nd partition on the IDE drive).
If you follow this scheme, it really does make it easy to recover from
bad viruses or any cluttering on XP by just restoring the image
(created by the xcopy command from the SATA to the IDE partition 2
after my XP system was installed and working just the way I like it,
but before anything got cluttered up).
Now my problem is this. I purchased another SATA drive (identical to
the original), and I used the windows startup disk to partition it
(FAT32, just like my original SATA drive), and make it active, and
then I formatted it. Then I ejected my windows startup disk, inserted
my IDE drive, and booted to windows 2000, which went fine and it
showed my my new SATA drive empty but all partitioned and formatted,
and marked ACTIVE. Then I used xcopy to restore the 2nd partition of
my IDE onto my newly partitioned and formatted SATA drive (using the
switches /s/e/c/h/o/y), and it seemed to copy everything onto the new
SATA drive just fine. I can compare my new SATA drive to my old one,
and I can see NO DIFFERENCE.
BUT! When I try to boot to my new SATA drive (by removing my IDE
drive), it tells me I have a non-system disk!!!!! ?????
So, obviously, there is still something else I need to do to this new
SATA drive that doesn't show up by ordinary inspection. I wonder what
it is.
If anyone can help, please advise.
Note that I can still format my original SATA drive (and see that it
is truly empty), and then restore it from the 2nd partition of my IDE
drive and that still works like a champ. So, what I need to know is
what could possibly be different between my original SATA drive and my
new SATA drive, which are the identical models and look exactly the
same via explorer and the DIR command.
Help.
fundamental step.
What I have is a PC with both SATA and IDE. My SATA drive has windows
XP installed and boots fine. My IDE drive is dockable (removable),
and, when it is not insterted, the PC boots to XP in the SATA drive.
When the IDE drive is inserted, then the PC will boot to it, where I
have Windows 2000 installed. My IDE drive actually has two partitons
on it, and the 2nd partition is set up to be the target of an xcopy
command that copies the entire contents of the SATA drive onto it
(using the switches /s/e/c/h/o/y). This works just fine for restoring
my SATA drive when it gets a virus or for any reason gets too
cluttered up. All I have to do is insert the IDE drive (and boot up
to windows 2000 on it), then I simply format the SATA drive, and then
xcopy from the 2nd partition of my IDE drive onto the SATA drive.
After that, I turn off my PC, eject the IDE drive, and boot to my SATA
drive, which boots just fine back to where it was when I originally
backed it up (to the 2nd partition on the IDE drive).
If you follow this scheme, it really does make it easy to recover from
bad viruses or any cluttering on XP by just restoring the image
(created by the xcopy command from the SATA to the IDE partition 2
after my XP system was installed and working just the way I like it,
but before anything got cluttered up).
Now my problem is this. I purchased another SATA drive (identical to
the original), and I used the windows startup disk to partition it
(FAT32, just like my original SATA drive), and make it active, and
then I formatted it. Then I ejected my windows startup disk, inserted
my IDE drive, and booted to windows 2000, which went fine and it
showed my my new SATA drive empty but all partitioned and formatted,
and marked ACTIVE. Then I used xcopy to restore the 2nd partition of
my IDE onto my newly partitioned and formatted SATA drive (using the
switches /s/e/c/h/o/y), and it seemed to copy everything onto the new
SATA drive just fine. I can compare my new SATA drive to my old one,
and I can see NO DIFFERENCE.
BUT! When I try to boot to my new SATA drive (by removing my IDE
drive), it tells me I have a non-system disk!!!!! ?????
So, obviously, there is still something else I need to do to this new
SATA drive that doesn't show up by ordinary inspection. I wonder what
it is.
If anyone can help, please advise.
Note that I can still format my original SATA drive (and see that it
is truly empty), and then restore it from the 2nd partition of my IDE
drive and that still works like a champ. So, what I need to know is
what could possibly be different between my original SATA drive and my
new SATA drive, which are the identical models and look exactly the
same via explorer and the DIR command.
Help.