In message <
[email protected]> FBonServer2008X64 <
[email protected]> was
Good for you. Not all ink listed as compatible is actually compatible.
One of my friends worked at a mall kiosk selling ink refill kits and
"recharging" ink cartridges, and his boss' instructions were to feel
free to swap labels on the bulk bottle refill kits whenever needed
(Within the same colour, of course) rather then turning away a customer.
This is interesting, and worthy of note. Some compatible inks work in
a wide range of printers. Others do not. If this is common practice
then I would imagine a lawsuit for burnt out heads if they can prove
the ink provided wasn't at least "compatible" according to the
manufacturer.
Now if you have a real world example of ink that was manufactured to
be compatible, I'd be glad to hear it.
This is why if you use bulk ink you really need to get information
from those who had experience with it. For me, I bought the cheapest
printer possible before taking the plunge, the Canon ip3000 was $45 so
it would be no great loss if the printer exploded.
It didn't matter what make or model of printer you wanted, you needed
yellow, you got "generic yellow" (although I believe he said they kept
photo ink separate from regular ink)
Ah OK, so they are swapping out black ink. For text 600dpi is common
place on inkjets. You can swap out dye for pigment with only a loss
in quality.
Sure. If this happens under the warranty period it also gets fixed by
the manufacturer.
Actually Canon ships out replacement heads with few questions asked,
and they don't even want the old head back. They sort of depend on
the end user's honesty. If an Epson fails, they either get sent a
factory referb or get sent to a repair facility, either way the
printer gets replaced while under warranty. The burden of proof that
it failed is on the consumer, which is easy to establish. The burden
of proof it was the fault of ink is on the manufacturer, and that's a
tough case to prove.