unless you are referring mvp to mvp;
this is not a peer to peer place.
it is instead a "free for all",
the unfortunate but understandable
aspect about this place is that there will
always be those who do not know how to share
or respect others. also, there are
opportunist and of course there
are the trolls who use this place
as entertainment.
i can appreciate your passion
for this issue and explanations.
but the criticisms integrated
into your explanations added
revealed an "attitude"and impatience
that cast a shadow over your
professional explanations.
if you were unable to ascertain
this from my initial one line response
to the o.p., it was not my intent
to provide a proverbial thesis
on this subject.
if my suggestion did not accommodate
the o.p.., then so what.
no point in having a cow over this
as there will be other suggestions
from others examining the issue.
if i "were interested" in this subject,
i could have simply reviewed the
other responses/postings.
the bottom line is that i didn't really
need any information from you,
especially since i wasn't asking any
questions.
but if you wanted to interject, then it could
have been a polite and respectful
manner, not unlike if you wanted to
ascertain the attention of a stranger
in a supermarket or something.
for what it's worth you provided
a great deal of useful information
on this subject to the o.p.,
be it may indirectly. but the o.p.
will have to filter out the adjectives
and garbage you integrated into
your explanations.
next time please use your time wisely
and provide your helpful information
to those who are "asking questions".
if i wanted more information from you
i would have politely asked your for it,
rather than challenge or degrade you.
again, you are not my peer,
but i hope that sharing the
above with you will prove
helpful....
--
db ·´¯`·.¸. said:
<)))º>·´¯`·.¸. , . .·´¯`·.. ><)))º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><)))º>
..
