Bill Sanderson

L

LinuxHereIcome

Bill - you appesar to be the microsoft tech answering
most of these posts.... your pat answer is run a scan in
safe mode. If that doesnt work, which it doesn't, send a
spyware report thru the Tools option.. which of course
doesn't work either.

It's beyond comprehension that Microsoft can't plug the
holes in thier own very poorly designed operating system
and keep these idiots that write spysware and virus's off
our computers. Personally I'd love to see virus, spyware,
malware authors lined up against a wall and shot.. I am
so far past my point of frustration I can't describe it.

I'd love one simple answer from Microsoft. How does this
garbage regenerate? Is it buried off in system restore?
What Windows service does it use to keep coming back. I
run a firewall and antivirus and the crap still comes
thru.
 
B

Bill Sanderson

I'm not a Microsoft staff person. I am a volunteer with some long history
of involvement with Microsoft products, and recognized as an MVP for doing
what I am doing here--answering customers questions.

These groups are to support the product beta. So my first goal is to see
whether some further operation with the product itself will cure the
infection, or whether it really is something that isn't handled at all by
Microsoft Antispyware, in which case I can make further suggestions--so
that's where that particular "pat answer" comes from. I'm neither the most
experienced spyware cleaner here, nor someone with an in-depth knowledge of
how the product works from the inside out--I'm more of an observer and
administrator, with just enough technical knowledge to be both helpful most
of the time, and perhaps dangerous on occasion.

No--System Restore is a red herring, I believe. Yes, viruses and spyware
are stored in System Restore restore points. No, they don't magically
reappear or regenerated from within those restore points. They will, of
course, if you USE the restore point which contains the virus or spyware
executables. I don't agree with the advice which suggests clearing restore
points before cleaning. I think it is reasonable to clear restore points
AFTER cleaning, when you are sure the system is clean and stable--but
clearing before takes away an important safety net.

Neither antivirus apps nor firewalls stop spyware. If you are keeping
patched to date, I believe most recent spyware are trojans which are being
installed by the users--click here to enter this site--allow this ActiveX
install to proceed further. That reminds me--my 9 year-old daughter was
looking a music lyric sites last night, and I better scan the laptop she was
using!

Yes there have been issues of spyware drive-by installs allowed by security
vulnerabilities in Windows and Internet Explorer. I don't have any idea
what proportion of the issues we are seeing today relate to what source of
original infection.

Your antivirus could spot some of this stuff. The premium price products
from Symantec and other vendors, are being "enhanced" to provide this
coverage. How well they are doing at the job I'm not sure, but some
proportion of hard to clean bugs I've seen posted here have Symantec
articles--I can't quantify that. The lines between viruses, root kits,
trojans, and spyware definitely have some gray areas, and probably will
continue to.

So--if it isn't hiding in System Restore, how does it do its magic? In my
experience there isn't much magic. The stuff is out there on the drive, and
has links to startup locations, and usually isn't hiding very hard. There
is a trend, however, which might be exemplified by this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;894278

article, which describes a piece of commercial spyware which hides in the
same fashion as a root kit.

As I've mentioned--there are lots of other posters here who are more
experienced at cleaning spyware than I am. My approach is to clear out the
temporary Internet Files, at a command prompt, perhaps in safe mode, and to
examine the startup locations--you can use the System Explorers in Microsoft
Antispyware--these allow you to take something you can't prove the safety of
and block it on a temporary basis and see the effect. Or you can use other
tools--silentrunners.vbs which is a script which gives a listing of the
contents of all known startup locations, etc. Or you can use the HijackThis
tool which provides logging and an easy to use interface to allow removal of
items judged by peer-reviewed experts to be bad.

I usually look over key parts of the system--the root of the boot drive,
system32, for hidden, system, read only files, and compare what I find to my
own knowledge of what clean systems typically have. If I find something
that sticks out, I will use the date and time of its creation and check
other locations for files that appeared about that same time.

This kind of work is as much art as science, I think, and I'll freely admit
to not being a great artist--I'm probably not describing everything that I
think about or do, either.

So--if you've got a bug that keeps coming back--1) If Microsoft Antispyware
id's it, then I believe it should be capable of cleaning it. If it can't
perhaps it is because it has missed removing a central process or executable
because it was in use. That's what the safe mode restart often takes care
of. It isn't a panacea, but it often does the job--the spyware isn't
running in safe mode, and the cleaning can be done properly. Should the
program be able to warn you about this?--I would thinks so--but I'm not a
programmer!

If Microsoft antispyware misses it completely--you are going to have to dig
deeper--using the system explorers or MSINFO or whatever reversable tools
you can use to test whether particular startup items are at the root of the
problem. If you can put a name to the bug you can do Google searches and
often get useful information. And, before I forget it, a fair portion of
recent commercial spyware is listed right there in add or remove programs,
and the remove functions do work.

Hmm - that wasn't from Microsoft, and it wasn't a simple answer, but
really--if it regenerates it is because it is still on your system in a
startup location, and it hasn't been cleaned properly.
 
S

Stephen Boots MVP-MSN Client

I'm not a Microsoft staff person. I am a volunteer with some long history
of involvement with Microsoft products, and recognized as an MVP for doing
what I am doing here--answering customers questions.

Bill:
You are doing an excellent job of helping out. Keep it up!
-steve
MSN-MVP
 
B

Bill Sanderson

Thanks! Stick around, and bring your friends, too--beta related questions
aside--this looks like it will need long term tending by lots of folks.
 
G

Guest

BILL - Re-read your answer. It was a ton of words that
said nothing other than you admit you don't know squat.
Do the world a favor and stay off these posts. There's a
serious problem out there with microsoft code that needs
to be corrected. you aren't helping. I am sorry if your
feelings are hurt, but we need answers, not BS. The last
thing thats needed is someone acting like an expert that
doesnt know diddly
 
B

Bill Sanderson

I think what I said was pretty accurate--I'm not going to pretend to be the
expert in this forum, and I don't think I've done so. What I am doing is
more helpful to the customers and to Microsoft than your anonymous
diatribes.
 
J

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

I think you should read his post again if that is all you got.
Read his other posts in this and other newsgroups as well.
You are probably one of the very few that feels he should "...stay off these
posts"

Are you the OP?
If so, changing name makes it difficult to follow.
Posting as anonymous also makes it difficult to follow.
 
P

PY

I think Microsoft is at cross roads. Unless they do
something immediately every windows user will spend
significant part of his/her life clening spyware.
Personally I am spending 80% of my computer time cleaning
up the spy/adware on XP. I have a feeling that I am
loosing control on my PC.

I have 3 master's degrees including one in computer
science. Fortunatly I work mostly on Unix systems. I
still can not comperhend why Microsoft is not seriously
looking in to the biggest challenge they are facing.

-PY
 
J

JohnF.

Watch out Bill, he's gonna tell you something.

He's got answers and boy are they concise and helpful.

I think our job is done here!

JohnF.
 
J

JohnF.

I've never had spyware but I know a lot of people who have. After I fix
them up, they don't get spyware either. I spend more time on the internet
than any 10 people I know. I also configure my computers to properly handle
venturing out on the internet.

I don't have ANY degrees, I do have 25 years experience with all kinds of
computers.

JohnF.
 
B

Bill Sanderson

If you want some sample evidence of the seriousness with which Microsoft
takes these issues--spend a little time to watch the last couple of
Security360 webcasts:

http://www.microsoft.com/seminar/events/series/mikenash.mspx

The most recent one includes Bill Gates's statements about the future of the
beta program we are evaluating here. This was a speech to the RSA Security
convention.

The previous one was specifically about spyware, and includes some
information about this beta and a brief segment with one of the developers
of this software.

They have already committed very substantial resources--with no return from
individual users for this product--to this issue, and there will be
more--Internet Explorer 7, and further products aimed at these problems.
 
S

Steve Wechsler [MVP]

Personally I am spending 80% of my computer time cleaning
up the spy/adware on XP.

PY ... you're either going to questionable web site, your system has not
been kept updated, or you do not understand how to protect said system.
Have a look at these fine web pages so that you can defend yourself and
your system :

So how did I get infected in the first place?
http://castlecops.com/postt7736.html

The Parasite Fight
http://www.aumha.org/a/parasite.htm

Virus & Malware Resources
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topict405.html

Steve Wechsler (akaMowGreen)

MS-MVP 2004-2005
Windows Server
Windows - Security
 
S

Steve Wechsler [MVP]

Your ignorance precedes your lack of manners. Not one person who has
posted to these news groups has been more helpful and generous with
their free time than Bill Sanderson. Normally I wouldn't even bother
answering such tripe as this, but you need some serious lessons in
reading, comprehension, and behavior.
At least have the courage to use your real name, coward.

No soup for you !!!

Steve Wechsler (akaMowGreen)

MS-MVP 2004-2005
Windows Server
Windows - Security
 
S

Soontobe a Linuxuser

The best thing I can say about Microsoft Antispyware is
it is priced appropriately... you pay zero and get zero.
actually that's not quite accurate, you pay zero and get
a lot of aggrivation and frustration but little or no
results removing spyware.
 
J

john

How does thisStay away from the porn sites and quit opening spam email cut your problems
down to nothing
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top