You must be using the same newsreader. My previous post is not showing up
with my reply to you either. On your reply its in light gray. The #1
company that seems to revel in fonts you can barely read (think of the
absurd color scheme of Windows Live Mail!) is Microsoft. Are you using
WLM to post this? Or Outlook Express? I'm using Operamail to read this.
I wonder....if others can read this perhaps there is an interaction
between Opera and your newsreader. I look forward to your reply. Or Russ
of course. Or anybody that knows!
Russ has no control over what is deleted and what is shown on your
computer.
Tell us why you think he does.
----------
This is what should be showing up here but your newsreader elected to
deprive us of:
| Russ, why does your newsreader delete my previous post? Is that a
| setting you've implemented? If so, its not a good one. If its an
| older thread or if the group gets a lot of posts nobody is going to
| know what you're replying about. It sort of makes the whole point of
| usenet useless. Please rethink this. The point of usenet is to
| dispense discussions to a wide number of people. Your
| setting/newsreader is only making our conversation relevant to a very
| few.
|
| As to your answer, that as well was not very well thought out. Since
| a large number of CRM users use Outlook add-ons or programs that
| piggyback on Outlook, there should be many people here that should
| know. Sure its not an ideal group but I didn't want to have to wade
| through a myriad of groups to find the ideal one. However if you or
| anyone else can suggest one I'd be happy to post there instead.
|
|| Not an Outlook question. Outlook is not CRM software and was never
|| intended to be.
|| You should be looking into CRM software. We'd have no idea here what
|| is good and what isn't.
|
| (This is what your newsreader/setting deleted. But of course this is
| all going to be wiped out when you reply. Do you see how illogical
| that is?)
||| I want to click a number and have Outlook or some Outlook add-on
||| dial it >using the regular phone network, then talk using my
||| computer mic and >speakers just like I do on Skype. I don't the
||| phone anywhere on the desk. >Also I want to use the same hardware
||| that I already use for Skype or any >other IM chat program. Info
||| on this seems to be very hard to find. What >most people could use
||| is one program that:
|| Dials a phone number
|| Faxes
|| Emails
|| SMS
|| Instant Messages (MSN, Yahoo & Skype compatibility would cover 98% of
|| the > users.)
||
|| Is there really no demand for such a centralization of communication
|| > control?
