Any license issues with quad-core processors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bert Hyman
  • Start date Start date
B

Bert Hyman

I recall that the standard license for Win2K allowed 2 CPUs and I
assume XP is the same.

How are quad-core processors treated as far as counting CPUs?
 
Hello,
I think this applies to multiple separate CPUs, not to multicore CPUs.

Greetings,
P. Di Stolfo
 
Bert said:
I recall that the standard license for Win2K allowed 2 CPUs and I
assume XP is the same.

How are quad-core processors treated as far as counting CPUs?

It should really be worded as processor sockets. Since a quad-core
processor uses a single processor socket, from a desktop OS standpoint
it is treated as a single item.

As far as your licensing memory, it's actually a support issue in that
W2K, XP and Vista only support up to two processor sockets. You can
have two multi-core processors (that would approach and surpass some
server configurations if you had dual quad-core processors in your machine).
 
I recall that the standard license for Win2K allowed 2 CPUs and I
assume XP is the same.


First, it's not really a licensing issue. It's one of software support
for the multiple processors.

Second, Windows XP *Professional* supports two processors, but XP Home
only one.

How are quad-core processors treated as far as counting CPUs?


The number of cores is irrelevant. It's the number of physical
processors that counts.
 
I recall that the standard license for Win2K allowed 2 CPUs and I
assume XP is the same.

How are quad-core processors treated as far as counting CPUs?

Are you kidding me?

Scratchi
 
Bert said:
I recall that the standard license for Win2K allowed 2 CPUs and I
assume XP is the same.

You're correct.

How are quad-core processors treated as far as counting CPUs?


The license restriction applies to *physical* CPUs, not the virtual
CPUs simulated by multiple cores.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
 
Hi all

Bruce Chambers said:
The license restriction applies to *physical* CPUs, not the virtual
CPUs simulated by multiple cores.
Have you found anywhere at MS saying so? - because tried to search for it
without results.
I think you're right, but it would be nice to be sure.

Bjarne
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Quad Core 12
XP Home legal on a multi-core machine? 16
AMD EPYC 0
Upload/Download Speeds 14
AMD AM1 - cute 6
Intel NUC NUC6i7KYK Skull Canyon Mini PC 1
Best CPUs of all Time 5
Wisdom of a 771/775 LGA adapter 1

Back
Top