M
Mark Rae
If you're downloading SP1 from M$, search for "Team Suite". <g>
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms364073(VS.80).aspx
Do a search within that page for "Visual Studio 2005 Enterprise Edition"
Note also the URL...
If you're downloading SP1 from M$, search for "Team Suite". <g>
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms364073(VS.80).aspx
Do a search within that page for "Visual Studio 2005 Enterprise Edition"
Note also the URL...
V said:clintonG said:Following the links at the download page [1] I see no SP download
for Visual Studio 2005 Enterprise Edition. Which download should I
use?
There's no such product as VS 2005 Enterprise Edition. There's
Express, Standard, Professional and Team - no Enterprise. Unless
you're using an express edition, you should use the Team Suite
version as that will work for every version of VS.
-cd
Carl, Do you know if they've fixed the Emacs bugs in SP1? (Was not the
case in the SP1 beta)
Is everyone else using the standard MS Editor? Not sure why
programmers would like that editor at all.
Thanks for comments. I am using Professional Edition. My mistake came in
reading too fast and observing the suffix - ENU and dyslexically "reading"
as an Enterprise Edition as noted in the Add or Remove Programs entry which
reads...
Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition - ENU
What's ENU stand for?
Final: Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 (SP1).
Personally, I can't understand why people get so attached to their
editor. I've found it make my life much simpler to simply adapt and
move on.
V said:Given the problems I've had with the SP1 beta, I'll sit this one out
until there is a compelling reason. Or if there are reports of fixes
to Emacs, then I"ll be the guinea pig, and I'll report in about how it
went. If only anyone knew about Emacs patches. <g>
Spam said:Size: 431.7 MB
Did they rewrite Visual Studios?
Spam Catcher said:Size: 431.7 MB
Did they rewrite Visual Studios?
I find the built in MS editor decent. Nothing wrong with it...
V said:Don't you find the constant repositioning distracting? Even something
simple like cursor position--those keys are sometimes at the right
side, sometimes at the bottom,.etc. How do you avoid the distraction
of having to hunt for keys?
Anyone else use EMACs with VS.NET? Probably not very many???
V said:Don't you find the constant repositioning distracting? Even something
simple like cursor position--those keys are sometimes at the right
side, sometimes at the bottom,.etc. How do you avoid the distraction
of having to hunt for keys?
V said:My guess is that many have moved on to external plugin editors. Some
of the VS Emacs bugs are severe (copy/pasting incorrect text...How did
they mess that up? And why can't they fix it?).
Spam said:I never had that problem - maybe I'm not as old ;-) I grew up with these
keyboards, so I've always found typing on them natural.
But each to their own!
'kill-to-end-of-line' command. (I know, VS now has control-L, but kind
Lucian said:I spend about 80% of my time thinking, 18% of my time typing and maybe
2% of my time editing. Moreover, every time I do editing it's a signal
that I need to spend more time thinking. So (1) having nonconventional
keystrokes for a rare task is actually worse, and (2) thinking is the
bottleneck, not keystrokes.
Spam said:Anyone else use EMACs with VS.NET? Probably not very many???
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.