A conspiracy theory>>> The truth behind the need for new display adaptors.

F

Frank

kirk said:
I have vista you overgrown baboon!

I have it, and I have beta tested it longer than you have
and I know more about it than you do,
and I will become a super expert in the monstrosity you admire so much.

Well lets see...I believe you just said in another thread that you
didn't have it loaded and you no longer use it but that you did try it.
You did say that right?
It that a lie of omission by just saying..."I have vista"? Where, in a
DVD case? Lies of omission are the worst kind of lies you know.
So come clean (no more lies) do you or don't you have Vista loaded on a
usable computer and you use it?
BTW, are you still living in your moms basement?
(brap, snort, chuckle)
Frank

Oh and one other lie you just told, you have not been using any Vista
release longer than me, have you.
(burp)
 
S

Stephan Rose

kirk said:
You want proof that I cannot give you. My hypothesis will be verified in
the future...
but if it will what you will say then? Nothing...

How can you claim to know the agenda of game companies?

Because unlike you...I have connections to the gaming industry.

--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯
å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰
 
K

kirk jim

Bill gates had connections with the coputer industry, heck he was most of
the computer industry,
yet he said the internet would never take off, and he ignored it at start.

You will see that I am correct... once people have lots of vista computers,
things will change.
 
A

Adam Albright

Well lets see...I believe you just said in another thread that you
didn't have it loaded and you no longer use it but that you did try it.
You did say that right?
It that a lie of omission by just saying..."I have vista"? Where, in a
DVD case? Lies of omission are the worst kind of lies you know.
So come clean (no more lies) do you or don't you have Vista loaded on a
usable computer and you use it?
BTW, are you still living in your moms basement?
(brap, snort, chuckle)
Frank

Oh and one other lie you just told, you have not been using any Vista
release longer than me, have you.
(burp)

Hey Frank, breathing into that paper bag didn't work I see. Well next
try pulling your head out of your ass.
 
A

Adam Albright

I have vista you overgrown baboon!

I have it, and I have beta tested it longer than you have
and I know more about it than you do,
and I will become a super expert in the monstrosity you admire so much.

It is because I know how crappy it is that I don't use it.
If I was using it, and I complained you would then say DON'T USE IT.

Well my little hairy monkey friend, I AM NOT using the damn thing for REAL
computing.

But I am still learning all its the details so I can insult you better when
you say "vista is great"

I am also learning so I can assist the victims of vista.

Now go stare at flip 3d for 2 hours and get off my case!

If Frank would give us his street address, I'm sure some of us would
be glad to chip in to send him a crate of fresh bananas. He does seem
to jabber aimlessly and jump up and down a lot more than other Vista
fan boys.
 
A

Adam Albright

Are you incapable of answering anything put to you at all?

Why do Net Cops like you have some need to pretend you're in charge?

I must admit I do find such foolish exhibitions damn funny though.

I answer serious questions from people seriously seeking help. I
suggest YOU try that sometime instead of playing the role of prima
donna. I do not subject myself to smartass types that demand I answer
their inquiries for some kangaroo court they think they can rein over.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that has observed that most smartass
types also have MVP behind their name. How precious.
 
M

Mike Hall - MS MVP

I was calling for decency, not trying to take charge.. obviously, you are
incapable of showing decency.. your bad..


Adam Albright said:
Why do Net Cops like you have some need to pretend you're in charge?

I must admit I do find such foolish exhibitions damn funny though.

I answer serious questions from people seriously seeking help. I
suggest YOU try that sometime instead of playing the role of prima
donna. I do not subject myself to smartass types that demand I answer
their inquiries for some kangaroo court they think they can rein over.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that has observed that most smartass
types also have MVP behind their name. How precious.

--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/
 
A

Adam Albright

I was calling for decency, not trying to take charge.. obviously, you are
incapable of showing decency.. your bad..

Who elected you boss of the newsgroup? The funny thing is you
constantly exhibit the very traits you condemn others for having.
 
A

Adam Albright

A call for decency is not being boss..

Matt. 7:1 Do not judge, or you too will be judged.

Matt 7:2-5

For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged and with the
measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the
speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the
plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, Let me take
the speck? You hypocrite* [pointing out the sins of others while by
pretense we think of ourselves as above sin], first take the plank out
of your own eye and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from
your brother's eye.

Learning yet?
 
M

Mike Hall - MS MVP

No point quoting the bible at me.. I am a non-believer.. lol.. but by any
standards, your act is as low as it can get.. hardly an achievement is it..


Adam Albright said:
A call for decency is not being boss..

Matt. 7:1 Do not judge, or you too will be judged.

Matt 7:2-5

For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged and with the
measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the
speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the
plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, Let me take
the speck? You hypocrite* [pointing out the sins of others while by
pretense we think of ourselves as above sin], first take the plank out
of your own eye and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from
your brother's eye.

Learning yet?

--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/
 
D

Donald L McDaniel

There's some truth for that but still. The requirements are
artificially high.

Sticking with the gaming example, wouldn't you yourself find it odd if
you had a computer that was perfectly capable of running a game far
more demanding than Aero but yet can't run Aero?

With apologies to Mike Hall:

If I may interject:
"Whether I found it 'odd' or not would be determined by the moment itself."
would be an 'acceptable' answer from Jean Paul Sarte.

"Whether I found it 'odd' or not would be determined by the current setting of
a bit." would be an acceptable answer from one given to usage of English on
computers.

I do not know the Hindu answer even though what I do know of that pagan
religion leads me to think it would be something on the line of "Does it
matter? All is 'Maya (illusion)." Then he would start counting the large
beads hanging around his neck, and silently repeat, over and over -- to
Whomever or whatever, only he knew -- "Om Mane Padme Hum, Om Mane Padme Hum."
(In English, "Hail, Jewel in the Lotus." -- which we Westerners take to mean,
"his belly button").

The Muslim answer would be something like "if it be the Will of Allah I will
cut it in half, and it will then be even, rather than 'odd'."

The Fundamentalist Christian would say "If it is in God's Will for the bit to
be 'even', it will be 'even'."

An Eastern Christian would carefully consider the next bit, whether it will be
"odd" or "even", since only he knows that life is controlled by chance, in the
great design of the Creator, and only He controls the next bit. Then he will
sign himself at least once in the Eastern way, from right to left, rather than
left to right, as the Romans do (in ignorance, obviously), and kiss the Rood
hanging around his neck a minimum of three times, while he genuflects before
an ikon of St. Genuflectus the Minor, of Arphaxad, carefully avoiding the
temptation to say the Rosary a few times, in ecumenical fervor.

An Atheistic Darwinist would simply declare that there was a 50% chance it
would be "even", rather than "odd", since Nature, through its "non-Laws" of
Evolution, would have somehow favored "even" over "odd".

A theoretical physicist would say that in our Quantuum Universe, it would be
both "even" and "odd". Then he would write a 1027 page treatise on the
"oddness" of "even", applying it to our sexual life, and he would appear on
Ophrah plugging it, becoming the latest darling of the talk circuit, and his
book would sell a million copies overnight, enabling him to quit the study of
Advanced Physics, and move to Ceylon or the Bahamas, where he would divorce
his wife, and marry a supermodel, becoming a guru for all the Rock Stars, who
spend all their time making it with his wife.

Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the original thread and message.
=====================================================
 
M

Mike Hall - MS MVP

Donald

The phrase to which you allude was not typed by me.. it was typed by
Stephan..


Donald L McDaniel said:
With apologies to Mike Hall:

If I may interject:
"Whether I found it 'odd' or not would be determined by the moment
itself."
would be an 'acceptable' answer from Jean Paul Sarte.

"Whether I found it 'odd' or not would be determined by the current
setting of
a bit." would be an acceptable answer from one given to usage of English
on
computers.

I do not know the Hindu answer even though what I do know of that pagan
religion leads me to think it would be something on the line of "Does it
matter? All is 'Maya (illusion)." Then he would start counting the large
beads hanging around his neck, and silently repeat, over and over -- to
Whomever or whatever, only he knew -- "Om Mane Padme Hum, Om Mane Padme
Hum."
(In English, "Hail, Jewel in the Lotus." -- which we Westerners take to
mean,
"his belly button").

The Muslim answer would be something like "if it be the Will of Allah I
will
cut it in half, and it will then be even, rather than 'odd'."

The Fundamentalist Christian would say "If it is in God's Will for the bit
to
be 'even', it will be 'even'."

An Eastern Christian would carefully consider the next bit, whether it
will be
"odd" or "even", since only he knows that life is controlled by chance, in
the
great design of the Creator, and only He controls the next bit. Then he
will
sign himself at least once in the Eastern way, from right to left, rather
than
left to right, as the Romans do (in ignorance, obviously), and kiss the
Rood
hanging around his neck a minimum of three times, while he genuflects
before
an ikon of St. Genuflectus the Minor, of Arphaxad, carefully avoiding the
temptation to say the Rosary a few times, in ecumenical fervor.

An Atheistic Darwinist would simply declare that there was a 50% chance it
would be "even", rather than "odd", since Nature, through its "non-Laws"
of
Evolution, would have somehow favored "even" over "odd".

A theoretical physicist would say that in our Quantuum Universe, it would
be
both "even" and "odd". Then he would write a 1027 page treatise on the
"oddness" of "even", applying it to our sexual life, and he would appear
on
Ophrah plugging it, becoming the latest darling of the talk circuit, and
his
book would sell a million copies overnight, enabling him to quit the study
of
Advanced Physics, and move to Ceylon or the Bahamas, where he would
divorce
his wife, and marry a supermodel, becoming a guru for all the Rock Stars,
who
spend all their time making it with his wife.

Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the original thread and message.
=====================================================

--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/
 
D

Donald L McDaniel

Donald

The phrase to which you allude was not typed by me.. it was typed by
Stephan..

I have a long-standing habit of not following a thread very accurately, which
sometimes leads to posting an article attributing the wrong person, for which
I can only apologize, and try to do better in the future.

What really confuses me are the "GT" symbols, and knowing where any particular
article is within the thread. So I usually address my comments to the last
person who replied. Usually, I am addressing something he said directly. But
sometimes, I am using his comment as a springboard to another related matter.

Whether this is rude, or whatever, I do not know.

I truly wish there were a better method for displaying threads properly in
graphical newsreaders.

While I was using a Macintosh, several newsreaders for OS X had graphical
displays of thread trees. Perhaps this facility should be incorporated into
Windows newsreaders.

But I digress...

Again, please accept my apology.

Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the original thread and message.
=====================================================
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top