+3.3V is reading at +3.79 ... Is that too high?

V

Vanguard

Motherboard: Abit NF7-S v2.0
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton
Memory: 512MB (two 256MB stick filling 2 of 3 slots)

Problem: +3.3V line is at 3.79V. Might be too high but what to do?

I had not ran my hardware monitor utility for awhile that shows
voltages, fan speeds, and temperatures. I replaced the fan on the CPU
so I ran the utility to let me see the before and after temperatures.
It was a bust because the 80mm fan isn't cooling any better than the
60mm fan (but the bigger fan is quieter). Apparently I am at the max
transfer rate for the stock heatsink and upping the airflow won't help,
so I'll have to look around for a better aftermarket heatsink.

Below are the voltages that I see in the hardware utility and also when
I go into the BIOS and look there at the reported voltages.

+5V 4.94
-5V -5.04
5VSB 4.92
+12V 11.61
-12V -11.78
I/O Voltage (+3.3V) 3.79
3.3V Dual Voltage 3.48
Vcc Voltage (+2.5V, DDRV) 2.64*
Core Voltage 1.64*

The BIOS lets me configure some of the voltages, but the 3.3V is not
included. The ones asterisked above, along with the chipset and AGP
voltages, are the only ones the BIOS lets me change. The hardware
monitor utility only lists one 3.3V line whereas the BIOS lists two of
them, one for "I/O Voltage (+3.3)" and another for "3.3V Dual Voltage".
What's the difference?
 
K

kony

Motherboard: Abit NF7-S v2.0
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton
Memory: 512MB (two 256MB stick filling 2 of 3 slots)

Problem: +3.3V line is at 3.79V. Might be too high but what to do?

Take voltage readings at the back of the ATX connector and
4-pin 12V connector to find out the actual output of the
power supply.


I had not ran my hardware monitor utility

What specific hardware monitor utility?
Below you mention "and also when I go into the BIOS...".
Does that mean the bios report seems to coincide? It does
appear you meant this but to be clear I ask anyway?

for awhile that shows
voltages, fan speeds, and temperatures. I replaced the fan on the CPU
so I ran the utility to let me see the before and after temperatures.

Is it running too hot or are you trying to overclock it?
It should not be hard to keep a Barton cool enough at stock
speed, rather it's quite easy to do, usually.

It was a bust because the 80mm fan isn't cooling any better than the
60mm fan (but the bigger fan is quieter).

How did you attach this 80mm fan? If you used a fan
adapter, that may be part of the reason why, as that
increases the volume of air the fan has to maintain pressure
on till it's exhausted out the 'sink fins.

Apparently I am at the max
transfer rate for the stock heatsink and upping the airflow won't help,
so I'll have to look around for a better aftermarket heatsink.

If you're trying to overclock past ~ 2.1GHz or using it in
an extreme environment, that (better 'sink) may be useful.
The stock 'sink should be plenty for stock speed though,
even with the stock fan undervolted some. Perhaps I've gone
off on a tangent and this isn't the scenario you're facing,
but if it is, you might recheck the base of the 'sink for
roughness or irregularities, and if it's using the stock
thermal pad, try a tiny bit of thermal compound instead,
while checking the heatsink mounting in case there was any
problem there. I'm just speculating about potential reasons
why a 'sink that should have no problem cooling a Barton
2500, would be having a problem.

Below are the voltages that I see in the hardware utility and also when
I go into the BIOS and look there at the reported voltages.

+5V 4.94
-5V -5.04
5VSB 4.92
+12V 11.61

12V is too low at 11.61 for an idle state, as with a bios
check. However, motherboard sensors quite often read a low
12V value, which is part of why multimeter readings are so
important.

There is another possibility though- If your power supply
weren't working properly OR it doesnt' have ample 12V
capacity and yet a fairly loaded 5V rail in conjunction with
the high 12V load from the CPU, it could be leaving this
least-loaded (3.3V) rail too high. OR, it could just be a
bios quirk, that it's reporting wrong- another reason a
multimeter is indespensible in such situations.

-12V -11.78
I/O Voltage (+3.3V) 3.79
3.3V Dual Voltage 3.48
Vcc Voltage (+2.5V, DDRV) 2.64*
Core Voltage 1.64*

The BIOS lets me configure some of the voltages, but the 3.3V is not
included. The ones asterisked above, along with the chipset and AGP
voltages, are the only ones the BIOS lets me change. The hardware
monitor utility only lists one 3.3V line whereas the BIOS lists two of
them, one for "I/O Voltage (+3.3)" and another for "3.3V Dual Voltage".
What's the difference?

It may be a separate subcircuit for the memory refresh from
5VSB rail when the system goes into a suspend-to-ram power
management state... but I don't know, it is just a
potential/guess. I wouldn't worry about that, rather
focusing on what the power supply is delivering to the power
connector(s) then proceeding from there. Any voltage on the
motherboard can't rule out board or power... still two
common variables at a minimum.

Now what wasn't mentioned- is the system having any
stability problems? Is anything getting overly hot besides
the CPU? For parts within thermal sensors you could
touch-test them.

While you have the multimeter out, you can confirm the bios
CPU core voltage too, making sure it's not too high, causing
higher CPU heat. Probably the easiest place to check that
while the board is still mounted in the system is where I've
placed a blue arrow in the picture, on the leg of the
inductor where the plated through-board hole just appears at
it's base.

http://69.36.189.159/usr_1034/nf7s2_vcore.jpg
That is, if the above is even a -S v2, I lost track of all
the NF7 versions.
 
V

Vanguard

kony said:
Take voltage readings at the back of the ATX connector and
4-pin 12V connector to find out the actual output of the
power supply.

I'll check. I haven't had my multimeters calibrated in a long, long
time.
What specific hardware monitor utility?
Below you mention "and also when I go into the BIOS...".
Does that mean the bios report seems to coincide? It does
appear you meant this but to be clear I ask anyway?

The Abit EQ 1.1.1.2 utility. This one was downloaded from Abit and
lists the NF7-S as one of the models supported. I tried also
downloading the Winbond monitor (which is mutually exclusive of the Abit
EQ utility, meaning you have to uninstall one to use the other) but
their web site was screwed up last night and would report the file
couldn't be found. I went into the BIOS to see what voltages it
reported, and they were within 0.01 of what the Abit EQ utility
reported. However, the BIOS reports two 3.3V voltages whereas the Abit
EQ only reports one.
Is it running too hot or are you trying to overclock it?
It should not be hard to keep a Barton cool enough at stock
speed, rather it's quite easy to do, usually.

Nope, no overclocking. The CPU just has the stock heatsink and I'll want
to replace it should I decide to overclock.
How did you attach this 80mm fan? If you used a fan
adapter, that may be part of the reason why, as that
increases the volume of air the fan has to maintain pressure
on till it's exhausted out the 'sink fins.

Peculiarly, temperatures went up 2 C when I used an 80mm in place of the
60mm fan, probably because of the sizing adapter. Could be too much
back pressure is getting created. I'll be getting some PanaFlow fans to
see if they are quieter and try both 60mm and 80mm sizes (so I can check
with and without the size adapter).
If you're trying to overclock past ~ 2.1GHz or using it in
an extreme environment, that (better 'sink) may be useful.

No overclocking. Clock is 1.83GHz. Air dusted the heatsink, too.
The stock 'sink should be plenty for stock speed though,
even with the stock fan undervolted some. Perhaps I've gone
off on a tangent and this isn't the scenario you're facing,
but if it is, you might recheck the base of the 'sink for
roughness or irregularities, and if it's using the stock
thermal pad, try a tiny bit of thermal compound instead,
while checking the heatsink mounting in case there was any
problem there. I'm just speculating about potential reasons
why a 'sink that should have no problem cooling a Barton
2500, would be having a problem.

Personally, I don't like the thermal pads. I prefer using thermal
compound (applied sparingly since its function is to fill the
microscopic gaps; gooping it is bad since metal-metal contact is far
better than through the compound). I didn't bother to lap this
heatsink, mostly because I don't like lapping the CPU's surface to
provide an equally mating surface. Since the temperatures are within
the operating range for the CPU, I'm still not concerned about the
temperatures between the 60mm and 80mm fans. That was more of an
experiment. Adding a backpanel fan will drop the CPU and system temps
by 5 C but I'm waiting until I get around to buying the Panaflow fans
(the Vantecs have not been as quiet as claimed). For now, I'll leave
the 80mm with adapter on the CPU because I'll take the 2 C increase to
get rid of the high whine from the 60mm fan. I have no room to put the
box on the floor so it is on my desk so I hear the fans all the time,
and I don't play the radio or television for background noise and am in
a basement with the casement windows shut so it's quiet down here and
fan noise is obvious.
12V is too low at 11.61 for an idle state, as with a bios
check. However, motherboard sensors quite often read a low
12V value, which is part of why multimeter readings are so
important.

Okay, I'll do that today. Need to make me a pot of coffee first.
There is another possibility though- If your power supply
weren't working properly OR it doesnt' have ample 12V
capacity and yet a fairly loaded 5V rail in conjunction with
the high 12V load from the CPU, it could be leaving this
least-loaded (3.3V) rail too high. OR, it could just be a
bios quirk, that it's reporting wrong- another reason a
multimeter is indespensible in such situations.



It may be a separate subcircuit for the memory refresh from
5VSB rail when the system goes into a suspend-to-ram power
management state... but I don't know, it is just a
potential/guess. I wouldn't worry about that, rather
focusing on what the power supply is delivering to the power
connector(s) then proceeding from there. Any voltage on the
motherboard can't rule out board or power... still two
common variables at a minimum.

Now what wasn't mentioned- is the system having any
stability problems? Is anything getting overly hot besides
the CPU? For parts within thermal sensors you could
touch-test them.

System has been quite stable. It is left always on (but allowed to go
into standby mode after 4 hours idle). I can touch the heatsinks
(including the one on the NB whose cheapo fan started making noise so I
put a bigger Zalman heatsink on it but without a fan). I didn't think
of touching the voltage regulators, though.
While you have the multimeter out, you can confirm the bios
CPU core voltage too, making sure it's not too high, causing
higher CPU heat. Probably the easiest place to check that
while the board is still mounted in the system is where I've
placed a blue arrow in the picture, on the leg of the
inductor where the plated through-board hole just appears at
it's base.

http://69.36.189.159/usr_1034/nf7s2_vcore.jpg
That is, if the above is even a -S v2, I lost track of all
the NF7 versions.

I believe the recommended core voltage is 1.65V (0.5V)so I didn't get
concerned that it was 1.64V. Thanks for the clue on where to find a
spot to measure it, though.
 
F

Floyd L. Davidson

Vanguard said:
I'll check. I haven't had my multimeters calibrated in a long,
long time.

Don't do this with anything other than a digital meter.
Personally, I don't like the thermal pads. I prefer using
thermal compound (applied sparingly since its function is to
fill the microscopic gaps; gooping it is bad since metal-metal
contact is far better than through the compound). I didn't

Want a great thermal compound? Go to a Napa Auto parts store,
and buy "Copper Anti-Seize Lubricant", made by Permatex, with an
Item #765-2569.

There probably are other brands, and in other stores the
Permatex brand will probably have a different part number.

It cost maybe $4-5 for a 4 oz container that will last for far
more CPU installations than I'll ever do!

This stuff is meant to be used on places like engine head bolts
and exhaust headers. But it is a *excellent* thermal compound,
and you'll have a very hard time measuring the difference
between it at the various silver based compounds that cost more
than that for just enough to do 3 or 4 CPU's.
bother to lap this heatsink, mostly because I don't like lapping
the CPU's surface to provide an equally mating surface. Since

Besides, what would you get... perhaps 1/2 a degree reduction in
temperature, at best.

Incidentally, on the Tyan boards that I have the 12v reading
goes up and down with the ambient temperature, but the actual
voltage doesn't. For whatever reason, the +12V reading is
far more affected than any of the others.

I have two Tyan S2462 boards that are both running Linux and
collecting sensor data at two minute intervals and graphing the
results. Doing something like that provides some insight into
what the measurements mean in the long term (I had never noticed
the correlation between the 12V reading and room temperature
until I graphed them both, as one example).

But generally on board sensor readings should be considered as a
benchmark, and the absolute values ignored. The significant
paramater is change over time, whether the change is fast or
slow. One of the advantages of a very flexible program and
doing graphs, is you can simply *zero* the reading! No need to
remember that 5V was actually reading 4.92V, just *set* it to
show 5.00V, and any change will be very easy to notice, even if
it takes a year to happen.
 
V

Vanguard

Well, I took the voltage readings. Below are the readings from the
BIOS. I didn't include the readings from the Abit EQ utility since they
were within ±0.01 of the BIOS readings, probably because the same source
is used (Winbond chip). I used 3 multimeters (AW Sperry Instruments,
Sencore, and Beckman) and show their difference from the values reported
by the BIOS:

Voltage _BIOS_ _____AWS______ ___Sencore____ ___Beckman____
+3.3V 3.79 3.82 (+0.03) 3.93 (+0.14) 3.82 (+0.03)
+5V 4.94 5.01 (+0.07) 5.16 (+0.22) 5.02 (+0.08)
-5V -5.04 -4.93 (+0.11) -5.10 (+0.06) -4.93 (+0.11)
+12V 11.61 11.77 (+0.16) 12.16 (+0.55) 11.81 (+0.20)
-12V -11.78 -11.66 (+0.12) -11.66 (+0.12) -11.68 (+0.10)

The AWS and Beckman were close, and also the multimeters that I more
trust. The Sencore is pretty old (20 years) and hasn't been calibrated
for maybe 10 years (for the cost of calibration, I can get a new
multimeter). Looks like the Sencore goes in the car's toolbox since
nothing automotive needs a lot of accuracy. Both the AWS and Beckman
were near identical for how much they differed from the BIOS settings
and those reported by the Abit EQ utility; the AWS and Beckman differed
by a max of 0.04V. Using the Beckman readings as the real ones, below
shows the minimum, actual, and maximum values permitted (only the
positive voltages are shown since I'm not sure anything much uses the
negative ones):

Voltage Minimum Actual Maximum
+3.3V 3.14 3.82 3.47
+5V 4.75 5.02 5.25
+12V 11.40 11.81 12.60

The 3.3V line is out of range. What uses the 3.3V line? If nothing is
using the 3.3V line then I could understand a high unloaded value (i.e.,
no load to pull it down). The -5V and -12V lines are rated only for
0.8A and 0.3A, respectively, so they don't feed much, but the 3.3V line
is rated for a max of 21A/28A (see http://snipurl.com/9wv1) so it is
definitely a well-used voltage.

The PSU is a Fortron Aurora 350W unit. I got the Forton because they
typically *underrate* their output; i.e., you get a reserve so you know
you can get all of the rated output and can even push it further; see
http://snipurl.com/flpq where they rated it to 413W (whereas you can
figure only gettin 70% of the rated power for the cheapies). The only
feature added by the Aurora model is the addition of the potentiometer
on the backside to adjust the speed for the 120mm fan but the thermistor
can override that setting (I didn't get nor want the version with the
blue LED to make it glow). I was surprised that I had to replace the
120mm fan after just 3 months when it got noisy (when cold) but, hey,
sometimes even parts fail in the better stuff. However, that review
also noted the Fortron 350 was noisy and maybe that's why I replaced the
fan with a quieter one (probably a Vantec Stealth; I think we talked
about this before regarding the thermistor PCB inside the Fortron).

As an aside, while leaving the side panel off, the system and CPU
temperatures dropped 7C. I only got a 5C drop by adding the backpanel
fan (with the side panel installed). Peculiarly, it doesn't sound any
louder with the side panel off. So, on my next test, I'm cutting out
the stamped out grill in the backpanel so it is just one big hole and
won't block the airflow from the backpanel fan (but I'll get one of
those wire bail grill covers just for safety). The holes in the grill
openings are too small and there is too much metal between them.
 
W

w_tom

A few concepts of fans. Whereas a 60 mm fan will tend to
either output less CFM or create more noise doing it, still,
to know how a fan works requires specs unique to that 80 mm or
60 mm fan. Some fans can output more CFM but make more
noise. Some fans may reduce CFMs quickly with but little back
pressure. This applies both to fans on heatsinks and 80 mm
fan for the chassis.

Airflow so gentle that a human hand cannot feel it provides
most heatsink cooling. As gentle airflow quadruples, heat
removal only doubles. And with more airflow, the amount of
heat removed increases on a decreasing exponential curve -
even less increase in heat removal. Two fans pushing massive
CFM through a heatsink: very little difference in heat removal
between what those fans remove and what hurricane winds would
remove. Appreciate how increasing CFM using a different fan
should cause so little difference in temperature.

Many assume double air means double cooling. As airflow
increases, the cooling improvements of more air decrease
rapidly to a point where the difference is really zero.

Those voltages: Voltages should lie in upper 3/4 limits of
those ranges. That 12 volts at 11.81 is marginal. A 12 volts
with excessive ripple voltage (ie DC volts oscillating between
11.5 and 11.87) might read 11.81). Most voltmeters do not
measure RMS. Therefore any reading in the bottom one quarter
of those voltage limits should be further examined for
excessive ripple voltage (ie using a scope). Provided is an
example of voltage that measures low but OK - but is actually
defective.
 
V

Vanguard

w_tom said:
A few concepts of fans. Whereas a 60 mm fan will tend to
either output less CFM or create more noise doing it, still,
to know how a fan works requires specs unique to that 80 mm or
60 mm fan. Some fans can output more CFM but make more
noise. Some fans may reduce CFMs quickly with but little back
pressure. This applies both to fans on heatsinks and 80 mm
fan for the chassis.

Airflow so gentle that a human hand cannot feel it provides
most heatsink cooling. As gentle airflow quadruples, heat
removal only doubles. And with more airflow, the amount of
heat removed increases on a decreasing exponential curve -
even less increase in heat removal. Two fans pushing massive
CFM through a heatsink: very little difference in heat removal
between what those fans remove and what hurricane winds would
remove. Appreciate how increasing CFM using a different fan
should cause so little difference in temperature.

I know that I'll word this improperly, but as the ambient temperature
(inside the case) goes up the less effective or efficient is the cooling
of the heatsink. Like you said, you could keep adding more airflow but
not result in a reduced temperature at the CPU die. As someone else
said, "One thing that plagues heatsinks is that as the ambient
temperature rises their ability to transfer heat from one medium to
another is degraded. This is especially troublesome to heatsinks with a
higher C/W rating since they tend to become saturated and can no longer
dissipate heat efficiently." So the clue is to lower the ambient
(system) temperature, get a heatsink with a lower C-per-Watt rating, or
both. Lowering the ambient temperature would mean moving more air
through the case so it doesn't get as much pre-warmed for the air used
to cool the CPU heatsink hence why some users put fans everywhere.
Getting a better heatsink with a lower C-per-Watt rating would help,
too. I figure I'll do a little of both: add a backpanel fan (which I've
actually already tested to see a 5 C drop in system and CPU temps) and a
better heatsink.

Right now I'm looking at getting a quieter PanaFlow fan for the CPU but
the stock heatsink uses cutouts in the fins for the screws and their a
bit damaged (one required me to twist the fin and use a larger screw);
i.e., rather than a clip to hold the fan or regular holes in a plate to
secure the screws, you are wedging the screw between a couple slots cut
in a couple of adjacent fins. With the greater weight for the 80mm-60mm
adapter and the 80mm fan, it's a concern that the mechanical security of
the fan is less than 100%. With the Panaflow fan costing $10, and that
I can get a ThermalTake Silent Boost (which also uses the PanaFlow fan
but with side vents in the shell) is just $23 more, I might go that
route.
Those voltages: Voltages should lie in upper 3/4 limits of
those ranges. That 12 volts at 11.81 is marginal. A 12 volts
with excessive ripple voltage (ie DC volts oscillating between
11.5 and 11.87) might read 11.81). Most voltmeters do not
measure RMS. Therefore any reading in the bottom one quarter
of those voltage limits should be further examined for
excessive ripple voltage (ie using a scope). Provided is an
example of voltage that measures low but OK - but is actually
defective.

Don't have an oscilloscope around anymore (got rid of it eons ago) to
check ripple. I'm not sure a digital multimeter set to AC (instead of
DC) would show the amount of ripple voltage riding atop the DC voltage.
I think you need to insert a capacitor inline with the test lead to
eliminate the DC voltage since the AC voltage measurement probably
requires a phase change (positive-negative) to read AC voltage. This
only works if the ripple voltage is sinusoidal instead of a square wave,
triangular (ramped), or stepped pulse. Presumably there is always
ripple but there is probably more under heavier load. I'll be checking
if I can measure the PSU's power output a little later (by measuring the
current on the power cord multiplied by the claimed 70% efficiency
rating of the Fortron).

This box was put together back in January 2003 and has been stable ever
since despite the out-of-range 3.3V line, a low 12V line (still within
range but no idea of the amount of ripple but which devices should
accomodate, anyway), and the somewhat elevated temperatures (35 to 40 C
for system and 48 to 51 C for CPU). Right now I'm looking at making the
system more quiet but noticed the elevated 3.3V reading along the way.
I might tweak something else along the way, like better cooling, but my
tweaking impulse right now is to reduce noise. When I saw the 3.79V
reading, I was wondering why the heck it was so high and yet everything
continues to run just peachy fine.
 
K

kony

The 3.3V line is out of range. What uses the 3.3V line? If nothing is
using the 3.3V line then I could understand a high unloaded value (i.e.,
no load to pull it down). The -5V and -12V lines are rated only for
0.8A and 0.3A, respectively, so they don't feed much, but the 3.3V line
is rated for a max of 21A/28A (see http://snipurl.com/9wv1) so it is
definitely a well-used voltage.

-5V & -12V are rarely used, most systems can run without
them at all. 3.3V is used by some but not others. It would
appear not used on yours. You could attach a 1 Ohm load to
it to see if that results in a drop near the spec... i mean
only as a test.

The PSU is a Fortron Aurora 350W unit. I got the Forton because they
typically *underrate* their output; i.e., you get a reserve so you know
you can get all of the rated output and can even push it further; see
http://snipurl.com/flpq where they rated it to 413W (whereas you can
figure only gettin 70% of the rated power for the cheapies). The only
feature added by the Aurora model is the addition of the potentiometer
on the backside to adjust the speed for the 120mm fan but the thermistor
can override that setting (I didn't get nor want the version with the
blue LED to make it glow). I was surprised that I had to replace the
120mm fan after just 3 months when it got noisy (when cold) but, hey,
sometimes even parts fail in the better stuff.

Probably a Yate Loon fan- I know they use them in many
models including some with the 12cm fans. Even worse- they
mount it non-vertically which effects sleeve-bearing fans
more than ball-bearing. The last one of those Sparkle PSU I
used in a box, I first lubed the fan with home-made
synthetic grease/oil mixture. The box was sold though, I"ve
no idea if it held up over time but I'd expect the lube
helped as I would probably hear (from owner) if it had
failed.


However, that review
also noted the Fortron 350 was noisy and maybe that's why I replaced the
fan with a quieter one (probably a Vantec Stealth; I think we talked
about this before regarding the thermistor PCB inside the Fortron).

As an aside, while leaving the side panel off, the system and CPU
temperatures dropped 7C. I only got a 5C drop by adding the backpanel
fan (with the side panel installed). Peculiarly, it doesn't sound any
louder with the side panel off. So, on my next test, I'm cutting out
the stamped out grill in the backpanel so it is just one big hole and
won't block the airflow from the backpanel fan (but I'll get one of
those wire bail grill covers just for safety). The holes in the grill
openings are too small and there is too much metal between them.

Good idea. I would also look at the front intake, see if
there's potential to improve the intake area and reduce any
obstructions some. Likely the original PSU fan was loud
because of the elevated temp... that wouldn't account for
all of it, but many people find those to be pretty quiet PSU
with the stock fan (though "quiet" is certainly subjective).
 
V

Vanguard

kony said:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:19:25 -0500, "Vanguard"
3.3V is used by some but not others. It would
appear not used on yours. You could attach a 1 Ohm load to
it to see if that results in a drop near the spec... i mean
only as a test.

Hmm, that's an idea. Next time I'm by a Radio Shack, I'll grab a power
resistor (http://tinyurl.com/7rqpf) to test this out. It seems odd that
the 3.3V line could provide 21 amps without there really being a need
for this voltage.
Probably a Yate Loon fan- I know they use them in many
models including some with the 12cm fans. Even worse- they
mount it non-vertically which effects sleeve-bearing fans
more than ball-bearing.

Yep, a Loon fan, and horizontally is the only position to mount the
larger 120mm fan (because the bottom/top plates are large enough but not
the back, front, or side plates). I put in a Vantec Stealth fan and
haven't had a problem since - except it does spin slower and probably
doesn't have the same airflow rate as the original fan. That's why I'll
be adding a backpanel fan but want get rid of the restricted stamped out
grill to eliminate back pressure which should help keep that fan quiet.
I would also look at the front intake, see if
there's potential to improve the intake area and reduce any
obstructions some.

Already did that. Besides keeping all the cables secured off to the
side, I also drilled out the 3-1/2 bay drive blank to let in more air
through the front. I did this because I noticed air was getting sucked
through the 3-1/2 floppy drive's slot. Often a front fan doesn't help
and actually hurts. Even AMD recommends not using a front fan: "A front
cooling fan is not essential. In some extreme situations, testing has
actually shown that these fans can recirculate hot air rather than
introducing cool air." (http://snipurl.com/ym8). Experimentation works
best to figure out if it helps or hurts, and if it helps then by how
much versus the added noise.

I'll can't find the old one so I'll have to pickup another nibbler tool
(http://snipurl.com/fm2k) though tough on the hand after cutting awhile.
I don't like the idea of using a wire cutter to snip the metal between
the outside ring of holes because that will leave a bunch of snaggies.
I've never see a hole punch that big. Any idea of how to make a clean
hole other than nibbling away at it?
Likely the original PSU fan was loud
because of the elevated temp... that wouldn't account for
all of it, but many people find those to be pretty quiet PSU
with the stock fan (though "quiet" is certainly subjective).

Actually mine was indicative of bearing wear with the cold-start rumble,
turning into a buzz as it warmed over, and eventually getting much more
quiet after many minutes. When the box went into standby mode, heat
output reduces and the thermistor in the PSU reduced the fan speed and
it would get noisier (but not quite as bad as during a cold start). If
you've heard CD-ROM drives (with a CD-ROM in the drive) revving up on
power startup and the extra noise therefrom then you'll have an idea of
the level of noise coming from the defective fan until I replaced it.
If the box was on the floor to the side of my desk then I probably
wouldn't have bothered until it was always making a buzzing noise even
after warmup; however, it sits on the desk next to the monitor because
that's the only room that I have for it. So the noise is in my face all
the time.

I figure the high 3.3V reading really isn't a problem because the box
has been working well for over a year. I figure, like you mention, that
it isn't loaded and that might why it is high and causes no problems.
It's one of those gotchas that perks up your eyeballs when you see it
and wonder why nothing bad has happened so far (that you know of).
 
K

kony

Hmm, that's an idea. Next time I'm by a Radio Shack, I'll grab a power
resistor (http://tinyurl.com/7rqpf) to test this out. It seems odd that
the 3.3V line could provide 21 amps without there really being a need
for this voltage.

Some boards do indeed use it.
Consider that the 3.3V amperage is a function of the
available 5V current and the current handling ability of
that subcircuit. For it to be able to supply 21 amps
doesn't "take away" anything from the rest of the supply to
the extent that no concessions are made to the 5V or 12V
peak to implement it.


Already did that. Besides keeping all the cables secured off to the
side, I also drilled out the 3-1/2 bay drive blank to let in more air
through the front. I did this because I noticed air was getting sucked
through the 3-1/2 floppy drive's slot. Often a front fan doesn't help
and actually hurts. Even AMD recommends not using a front fan: "A front
cooling fan is not essential. In some extreme situations, testing has
actually shown that these fans can recirculate hot air rather than
introducing cool air." (http://snipurl.com/ym8). Experimentation works
best to figure out if it helps or hurts, and if it helps then by how
much versus the added noise.

It all depends on the implementation.
If a front fan is used, and mounted on the case wall, the
front bezel needs be of a design (or a partition added) that
prevents drawing the air OUT of the top of the chassis' main
compartment then down through the chassis-bezel chamber and
then into the chassis main compartment again, a
recirculation of the air already inside.

Even when a case causes this, the solution is simple- add a
partition, whether it be a piece of plastic glued above
where the fan intake stops, or hot-gluing on a piece of
dense foam, or whatever- just a prevention of this
recirculation.

The benefit of the front fan is more that of assisting the
exhaust but also to direct the flow past the hard drives,
southbridge, and more flow under the video card. While your
3-1/2 bay plate solution could be used on some cases and
situations, on others it may reduce HDD and lower-chassis
cooling. It can need be taken on a case-by-case basis.

Also keep in mind that AMD, like Intel, provides specs that
emphasize keeping the CPU cool with their retail 'sink.
Towards that end, the lowest cost cooling implementation for
an OEM is minimal number of fans possible, such that a
single fan has more of a positive effect on CPU cooling by
being placed below the power supply on the rear case wall.
That IS a good placement for a fan, is usually the first
place a fan should be added to a system, but properly
implemented the bottom-front fan is the second place one
should go... almost never a side-fan without a bottom front
as that drastically reduces the flow past the drives, unless
the side-fan were an exhaust which then drastically reduces
flow past (most components including CPU, motherboard, and
power supply exhaust.




I'll can't find the old one so I'll have to pickup another nibbler tool
(http://snipurl.com/fm2k) though tough on the hand after cutting awhile.
I don't like the idea of using a wire cutter to snip the metal between
the outside ring of holes because that will leave a bunch of snaggies.
I've never see a hole punch that big. Any idea of how to make a clean
hole other than nibbling away at it?

Depends on the thickness of the case. I don't use ANY cases
thinner than 1.0mm myself, and find that I can use a
fine-toothed sabre saw and finish with some medium-fine
sandpaper, only along the cut-edge to smooth it, not sanding
on the finished surface of the panel. Depends a bit on
where you're cutting too... in some situations I've dressed
holes in side panels with vinyl automotive "door edge guard"
molding, cheap/small type that costs about $1.50 per yard,
which starts out black but can be painted with vinyl dye to
match many color schemes. It has a glue strip in it that,
after being heated with a heat-gun or hairdryer, will melt
and secure the trim onto the metal edge pretty well. Using
such trim, the edges could be quite crudely cut and still
look good, though I sand them smoot first regardles of this,
but the whole cutting/sanding process is always done prior
to building a system, never with parts inside.

For thinner metal you can use metal shears, a bit like a
nibbler in some respects but motorized. Even tin snips can
work well if the're decent and you cut a rectangular hole
with semi-rounded edges rather than trying to get it
circular. The easiest way to get a pattern for this is to
scrap an old fan, cut it in half lengthwise with a hacksaw.
Then you're left with a template for the square/rounded-edge
holes and for marking new screw holes.

The other option is a 3" hole-saw (for 80mm fan holes).
They often look good if you can put a block of wood behind
the region being cut, BUT most fans slope outward towards
the edge of their fans from the center, so a 3" hole is a
little more impedance than a square/rounded-edge hole.

In some cases where there was already an appropriately-sized
stamped-in-metal grill, I'll just use tin snips to cut the
grill out, being conservative to leave a few mm of material
behind so the cutting doesn't bend the portion of metal I
intend to have remaining when finished, then I remove the
remainder of the (mm of material) with a dremal or drill
plus grinding stone.

The central theme here may be that it varies, based on the
case and the specific goal, in addition to what tools you
have.


Actually mine was indicative of bearing wear with the cold-start rumble,
turning into a buzz as it warmed over, and eventually getting much more
quiet after many minutes.

Oh, now I see.
The fan might be salvageable for a less-critical use by
lubing it with moderately thick oil/grease lube.

When the box went into standby mode, heat
output reduces and the thermistor in the PSU reduced the fan speed and
it would get noisier (but not quite as bad as during a cold start). If
you've heard CD-ROM drives (with a CD-ROM in the drive) revving up on
power startup and the extra noise therefrom then you'll have an idea of
the level of noise coming from the defective fan until I replaced it.
If the box was on the floor to the side of my desk then I probably
wouldn't have bothered until it was always making a buzzing noise even
after warmup; however, it sits on the desk next to the monitor because
that's the only room that I have for it. So the noise is in my face all
the time.

Alright, I was under the impression it was also spinning
faster than average, but now realize the situation.
I figure the high 3.3V reading really isn't a problem because the box
has been working well for over a year. I figure, like you mention, that
it isn't loaded and that might why it is high and causes no problems.
It's one of those gotchas that perks up your eyeballs when you see it
and wonder why nothing bad has happened so far (that you know of).

We used to see memory and AGP using 3.3V, but often the
video was stepped-down from 5V. Even further back in
history, more things running from 3.3V, but these days all
the core chipets are using less than 3.3V, and while some
subcircuits can use 3.3V, many (like audio codecs) work
better at 5V. 3.3V is just too low, higher percentage
losses when remotely supplied rather than stepped-down from
5V. Now we're seeing same thing with 5V, more and more CPU
and video cards make use of 12V for similar reasons.
 
L

larry moe 'n curly

Vanguard said:
Voltage _BIOS_ _____AWS______ ___Sencore____ ___Beckman____
+3.3V 3.79 3.82 (+0.03) 3.93 (+0.14) 3.82 (+0.03)
+5V 4.94 5.01 (+0.07) 5.16 (+0.22) 5.02 (+0.08)
-5V -5.04 -4.93 (+0.11) -5.10 (+0.06) -4.93 (+0.11)
+12V 11.61 11.77 (+0.16) 12.16 (+0.55) 11.81 (+0.20)
-12V -11.78 -11.66 (+0.12) -11.66 (+0.12) -11.68 (+0.10)
The 3.3V line is out of range. What uses the 3.3V line? If nothing is
using the 3.3V line then I could understand a high unloaded value (i.e.,
no load to pull it down
The PSU is a Fortron Aurora 350W unit. I got the Forton because they
typically *underrate* their output; i.e., you get a reserve

The +3.3V seems to be used for lots of chips and also for the DIMMs
(regulated down to about 2.5V for DDR). I recently bought a PC Chips
M825G with integrated video and a Semptron 3000+, and while running
MemTest86 it drew 3.5A @ +3.3V, 4.7A @ +12V, and maybe nothing from
+5.0V. A few years ago, C'T magazine tested XP2400+ systems and
measured around 8-10A @ +3.3V, 2-5A @ +5.0V, and 9-12A @ +12V.

If the Aurora is built like older Fortron/Sparkle PSUs, where all the
power cables exit is a small vertical circuit board that regulates the
+3.3V, and it has a small pot on it. Very close to the pot should be a
cylindrical coil made of thick solid copper wire, possibly with a screw
driven into it.

I think that all but the oldest Fortrons regulate the voltages OK even
at low amp levels and shouldn't need a load resistor on any rail,
except maybe for testing purposes. OTOH I have a 300W Delta PSU that
doesn't regulate right unless the +5.0V rail is loaded down by several
amps, and even with a 500 MHz AT/ATX mobo (uses +5.0V for almost
everything) its +12V rail was too low to even make the HD spin.
 
W

w_tom

When ambient temperature rises, the entire heatsink CPU
assembly rises equally. Efficiency (thermal resistance) of
that heatsink fan assembly does not change. If case (ambient)
temperature increases 5 degrees, then CPU increases 5
degrees. CPU temperature must be low enough so that a room at
100+ degrees F still does not increase CPU temperature to or
above its (safety margin) rated temperature (ie 85 degree C)

The degree C per watt number is a measurement of thermal
resistance. It remains constant with ambient air at 70 degree
F and 105 degrees F.

Voltage monitor circuits on motherboards do not use the best
components. They are voltage monitors. But first one must
verify accuracy of those numbers - which you demonstrated with
readings from 3 multimeters. Once accuracy has been confirmed
(using multimeter), then MBM software alarm levels may be
adjusted to compensated for accuracy of motherboard hardware.

Typical digital voltmeter on AC setting has a frequency
limitation. Most don't accurately measure tens of kilohertz
of AC voltage (ripple voltage). They do measure tens of hertz
AC voltage (AC electric). Therefore basic digital voltmeters
are not good for measuring ripple voltage.

However, your multimeter DC voltage measurements are within
those upper 3/4 limits making ripple voltage concerns probably
irrelevant. The mention of what limits are good, bad, and
questionable was provided for information only.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Top