R
Ruediger Wolf-Sebottendorff
Hi,
I've searched a lot but nothing helped, so I hope somebody here knows
something about that issue:
I need to install software for a medical device on a notebook, which runs on
XP Pro (upgraded from XP Home, most patches via Windows Update). The device
needs a serial port which the notebook doesn't have, so I installed a
USB/serial adapter.
The software is a collection of smaller programs which are mixed 32 and 16
bit mode. The 32 bit applications work fine, but every 16 bit program i try
to start - even command.com - dies shortly after it's corresponding
ntvdm.exe died, without any error message and no 'zombie' ntvdm.exe in
process list.
All I found was KB314106 which describes how to check the ntvdm-subsystem,
like i did.
The software works fine on a desktop system (XP Pro), even with the USB
adapter, so I checked the NTVDM components (Ntio.sys, Ntdos.sys, ntvdm.exe,
redir.exe and all the other stuff) against the other installation, but
found no difference.
If there are other ways to fix this problem than to reinstall XP, please
tell me, it would save a lot of time :-/
Rüdiger
I've searched a lot but nothing helped, so I hope somebody here knows
something about that issue:
I need to install software for a medical device on a notebook, which runs on
XP Pro (upgraded from XP Home, most patches via Windows Update). The device
needs a serial port which the notebook doesn't have, so I installed a
USB/serial adapter.
The software is a collection of smaller programs which are mixed 32 and 16
bit mode. The 32 bit applications work fine, but every 16 bit program i try
to start - even command.com - dies shortly after it's corresponding
ntvdm.exe died, without any error message and no 'zombie' ntvdm.exe in
process list.
All I found was KB314106 which describes how to check the ntvdm-subsystem,
like i did.
The software works fine on a desktop system (XP Pro), even with the USB
adapter, so I checked the NTVDM components (Ntio.sys, Ntdos.sys, ntvdm.exe,
redir.exe and all the other stuff) against the other installation, but
found no difference.
If there are other ways to fix this problem than to reinstall XP, please
tell me, it would save a lot of time :-/
Rüdiger