N
NotMe
It doesn't even take that.
I have 4 sticks of RAM, 2x512MB and 2x256MB for a total of 1.5GB
I has assumed that since the banks for RAM were divided into 2 sets of 2,
that putting matched pairs into each bank would make dual channel work.
It doesn't.
The designers were backwards in their thinking.
To make dual channel work, you have to put the matching sticks in the same
slot IN EACH BANK.
So instead of having bank 1, slot 0/1 with the 512MBs, you have to have bank
1, slot 0 and bank 2, slot 0 contain the 512MB chips and bank 1, slot 1 and
bank 2, slot 1 contain the 256MB chips to make dual channel work.
I rearranged the 2 of the 4 sticks to make dual channel work. No other
hardware was changed/enabled/disabled.
Vista Ultimate required a phone call for reactivation.
IMHO, that is pushing the envelope WAY too far!
MS has gotten so paranoid about piracy that their oppressive tactics will
backfire and cost them way more than having some people install on several
machines.
I have 4 sticks of RAM, 2x512MB and 2x256MB for a total of 1.5GB
I has assumed that since the banks for RAM were divided into 2 sets of 2,
that putting matched pairs into each bank would make dual channel work.
It doesn't.
The designers were backwards in their thinking.
To make dual channel work, you have to put the matching sticks in the same
slot IN EACH BANK.
So instead of having bank 1, slot 0/1 with the 512MBs, you have to have bank
1, slot 0 and bank 2, slot 0 contain the 512MB chips and bank 1, slot 1 and
bank 2, slot 1 contain the 256MB chips to make dual channel work.
I rearranged the 2 of the 4 sticks to make dual channel work. No other
hardware was changed/enabled/disabled.
Vista Ultimate required a phone call for reactivation.
IMHO, that is pushing the envelope WAY too far!
MS has gotten so paranoid about piracy that their oppressive tactics will
backfire and cost them way more than having some people install on several
machines.