Why I prefer beta 1

G

Guest

Since I could not find an option to post feedback, I thought I'd post it on
this site hoping that Microsoft reads it.

The beta1 system explorer had more options than the beta2 software explorer.
Not that I continuously check the downloaded activeX or use the IE options.
But I'd still like to keep them.

Beta2 updates it's definition file through Windows Update. I hate this most
of all. I don't want Windows to update itself without me knowing about it and
I'd like to have the option to exclude certain updates. But now I keep
getting Windows Update warnings about definition files. Please make it
possible for me to separate the download settings for Windows Defender and
Windows itself.

Windows Defender has been preset to scan the computer at 2 am every day. but
since I do not use the computer at night, I switch it of. This means that
after 3 days I get a nag screen complaining that I haven't scanned for
spyware. Although this in itself is a good thing, I'd like to have an option
that allows me to set the time after which Windows Defender gives me a
warning.

Although beta2 is probably a better product for the average home user,
Microsoft must realize that not all of its customers are computer illiterate.
Like they themselves told me at the recent DevDays, it's a plus to have a
simple user interface for average users, but also include a more advanced
interface for the more experienced users.


P.S.
For the future it's definitely an improvement that you no longer need admin
rights, but currently other programs still require this.
The fact that beta2 is a service, is also an improvement for some users, but
I'm either logged on, or my PC is switched of.
 
B

Bill Sanderson

additionally, it should run missed scans something like 10 minutes after the
next login.

--
 
G

Guest

It looks like you're right. I should have gotten that nag screen again this
morning, but when I checked the history, it said a scan had ran yesterday
morning. I know I didn't start that one myself.
I don't know what went wrong the first time, but this is of course behaviour
that I do like.

Jerry
 
B

Bill Sanderson

Good! One excellent aspect of beta2 is that the quickscan is actually
intended to be 100% effective at finding active spyware in place. And it is
MUCH lighter on resource usage than a fullscan, which has to compute hashes
for every object scanned. So--a quickscan running while you are getting
started working is usually tolerable--a fullscan might not be. There are
folks here who are going for fullscans as a they always did, and find the
background scan intolerable.

--
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top