VISTA SUCKS OMGZZLOLOLOL!!!!1111!!!!!ONE!!ONE111 GET A MAC!!!!

[DanS]

I know, in the past, you have made it very clear how ORGANIZED you
are. However, in a business setting being organized has nothing to do
with it nor does it negate the feature. You simply do not understand
this and that's fine. Others do and that's what matters.

No, I understand the search feature is important to people that have to
contstantly search their HD's for something, but simply pointing out that
this seems to be the best feature in Vista, based upon the fact that 'off
the top of my head' responses just about always mention searching first.

Now let's tie this into home users. Who wants to use Vista at work to
then use XP at home? Funk Dat!!!


No description was given to the term "faster". Faster does not only
mean application speed. Why is it whenever someone seeks new Vista
features (to debunk Vista) they narrow their path to only UI
quickness? However, you clearly missed my point about (or maybe you
didn't understand it?) how a user can load their machine with APPs
where XP used to bog down and become unresponsive, can now work at
full speed. That is "APPLICATION PERFORMANCE.....PERIOD."


See above.



Skill level? NO OS can raise your skill level by itself. What
exactly are you trying to prove?

I'm not rying to prove anything. I was simply picking apart the sentence
quoted above. XP doing 'whatever' not as well, to me, not as well, is the
users skills, vision, techniques, etc.

The best/quickest example I can give is the following:

SAME MACHINE:

XP:
Run Folding@Home on max level. CPU hits 100%. System is slow to
respond and running anything else (IE, OE) is pointless. You simply
can not use the machine productively in any way.

Running IE & OE are pointless anyway no matter what OS.

Vista:
Run Folding@Home on max level. CPU hits 100%. System is quick to
respond. You can run any other applications with no problems and only
a slight (VERY SLIGHT) performance hit.

That is "APPLICATION PERFORMANCE.....PERIOD."

Let's try an example of a program that is a real world business
application, not some distributed computing crapplication....

Above you state......'However, in a business setting being organized has
nothing to do with it nor does it negate the feature.'

Folding@Home is by far NOT a business application.

What percentage's of businesses would allow you to run Folding@Home
anyway.

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

1. I didn't reply to you.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ? If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

2. My comment stands.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.

??? Try using the full term...CLIENT images. Those would be images
of the clients. Client machines. Maybe you prefer Ghost Images?
Disk Images? Clone Images? IBM PC Compatible System Images?

Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

Really? That's odd.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic. Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

 

[Justin]

No, I understand the search feature is important to people that have to
contstantly search their HD's for something, but simply pointing out that
this seems to be the best feature in Vista, based upon the fact that 'off
the top of my head' responses just about always mention searching first.

Who said best? I'd say it's the top PRODUCTIVITY feature. You are trying
to specifically address productivity. You where given a productivity
example.

I'm not rying to prove anything. I was simply picking apart the sentence
quoted above. XP doing 'whatever' not as well, to me, not as well, is the
users skills, vision, techniques, etc.

Well, leave skill out of it. Vista is much more productive for my use and
I've explain how in a few different example. That's what you wanted, that's
what you got.

Running IE & OE are pointless anyway no matter what OS.

Wow, that's all you have to say? I picked two non-resource intensive apps
to illustrate a point. If you didn't get it then that's on you.

Let's try an example of a program that is a real world business
application, not some distributed computing crapplication....

Above you state......'However, in a business setting being organized has
nothing to do with it nor does it negate the feature.'

Folding@Home is by far NOT a business application.

What percentage's of businesses would allow you to run Folding@Home
anyway.

Holy crap!!!!!!!! You bitched about my business example so I gave you a
HOME example. Now you bitch about the home example?

This is quickly becoming a waste of time.

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

I said QUICK EXAMPLE! Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick WHATEVER
application you want. I picked one that RAPES a CPU to the fullest. I used
a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your boat then roll with it.
The same goes with those as well.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ?

No, you made a specific comment on how, what I said, was not inline with
your previous comment. It didn't have to be. Like I said, I wasn't
replying to you.

If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

Read above.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.
Ok.



Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

You should read up on WIM and it's advantages, specifically bare-metal
installations.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

Awesome!

 

[Justin]

WD-40 isn't flammable.

Yes it is! So much so, I've had it combust on me while using it with
extreme heat.

Read the can.

however, if you mix common brake fluid, with Clorox, it will make smoke, a
LOT of smoke.
(9 out of 10 guys who read this will try this before the weekend is
over...)
LOL

I'll try it before the weekend starts

 

[john]

Yes it is! So much so, I've had it combust on me while using it with
extreme heat.

Read the can.


I'll try it before the weekend starts

just don't do it anywhere -near- the house... really

 

[Justin]

just don't do it anywhere -near- the house... really

Does it have to be Clorox brand or will any bleaching agent do?

 

[DanS]

Who said best? I'd say it's the top PRODUCTIVITY feature. You are
trying to specifically address productivity. You where given a
productivity example.

The interpretation of the best was based on it is usually the first thing
mentioned.

Wow, that's all you have to say? I picked two non-resource intensive
apps to illustrate a point. If you didn't get it then that's on you.



Holy crap!!!!!!!! You bitched about my business example so I gave you
a HOME example. Now you bitch about the home example?

This is quickly becoming a waste of time.

No, it's not. Read on.

I said QUICK EXAMPLE! Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick
WHATEVER application you want. I picked one that RAPES a CPU to the
fullest. I used a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your
boat then roll with it. The same goes with those as well.

OK, I pick Folding@Home.

I just downloaded v5.03 from the Stanford.edu site. I set the CPU slider
to 100% and checked the box to 'Disable Highly Optimized Machine Code',
and set the molecule redraw rate to max. From what you described I
expected my computer to bog down to nothing.

Suprisingly, it didn't. Running this with set to 100% CPU does just that,
the CPU is constantly between 95% and 100%, with a few percent being
allotted here and there for other processes.

I see absolutely nothing that you describe. I launched programs left &
right. Long startup programs, Paint Shop Pro 10, Adobe Premiere, no
effect what-so-ever.

So I tried IE6, which I can't remember the last time I ran it, and like I
said, it's been a long time, but that seemed to start as fast as I've
ever seen it start.

Watching the task manager, when the CPU is needed for something else,
Folding seems to let it go like it should. If you don't believe me I can
post a video of it rather easily, I've got a utility that screen captures
to a video file instead of just stills.

I am definately suprised at the performance of this program, way better
than the Seti@Home thing ever was. This may actually be a very well
written program.

Of course, I just realized that this particular 1Ghz Athlon box w/512Megs
of RAM only has XP w/SP1 on it, maybe that has something to do with it.

So it's not a waste of time because you can see that I have not just
called you names and been an idiot, I have tried out something you have
suggested fairly, I can prove the results to you about this specific test
if needed, and all of this was just discussed.

But now, if having Vista over XP is the sole reason this app runs so much
better on the same hardware when Vista is installed rather than XP, why
does it have simply no effect on my system ? What was wrong with your XP
install ?

 

[Guest]

WINDOWS VISTA IS A POORLY WRITTEN, RIDICULOUSLY BLOATED PIECE OF CRAP!! 1 GB
OF RAM FOR ITS CRAPPY TRANSPARANCY EFFECTS!! I CAN DO THAT IN UBUNTU WITH
256MEG!!! GET A MAC!!!

Vista "Rocks"!!! (thats the opposite of "sucks")

 

[DanS]

Yes it is! So much so, I've had it combust on me while using it with
extreme heat.

Read the can.

Is WD-40 itself flammable, or is it only flammable in vapor state ? Like
while being sprayed ?

Gasoline is flammable too, but usually only in vapor state. And, no matter
what hollywood wants you to believe, dropping a lit cigarette in a puddle
of gas will not ignite it.

 

[DanS]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

I did reply. WTF? Let me check my sent items.

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

Here it is again:

No, I understand the search feature is important to people that have to
contstantly search their HD's for something, but simply pointing out that
this seems to be the best feature in Vista, based upon the fact that 'off
the top of my head' responses just about always mention searching first.

Who said best? I'd say it's the top PRODUCTIVITY feature. You are trying
to specifically address productivity. You were given a productivity
example.

I'm not rying to prove anything. I was simply picking apart the sentence
quoted above. XP doing 'whatever' not as well, to me, not as well, is the
users skills, vision, techniques, etc.

Well, leave skill out of it. Vista is much more productive for my use and
I've explain how in a few different example. That's what you wanted, that's
what you got.

Running IE & OE are pointless anyway no matter what OS.

Wow, that's all you have to say? I picked two non-resource intensive apps
to illustrate a point. If you didn't get it then that's on you.

Let's try an example of a program that is a real world business
application, not some distributed computing crapplication....

Above you state......'However, in a business setting being organized has
nothing to do with it nor does it negate the feature.'

Folding@Home is by far NOT a business application.

What percentage's of businesses would allow you to run Folding@Home
anyway.

Holy crap!!!!!!!! You bitched about my business example so I gave you a
HOME example. Now you bitch about the home example?

This is quickly becoming a waste of time.

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

I said QUICK EXAMPLE! Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick WHATEVER
application you want. I picked one that RAPES a CPU to the fullest. I used
a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your boat then roll with it.
The same goes with those as well.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ?

No, you made a specific comment on how, what I said, was not inline with
your previous comment. It didn't have to be. Like I said, I wasn't
replying to you.

If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

Read above.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.

You do not need to concur. The linux freaks already have. This has ALL
been discussed before and in great length in this NG already.

Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

You should read up on WIM and it's advantages, specifically bare-metal
installations.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

Awesome!

 

[Justin]

Is WD-40 itself flammable, or is it only flammable in vapor state ? Like
while being sprayed ?

When a can says FLAMMABLE I tend to not throw matches at it's contents while
coming out or after it's sprayed.

Gasoline is flammable too, but usually only in vapor state. And, no matter
what hollywood wants you to believe, dropping a lit cigarette in a puddle
of gas will not ignite it.

As you stated "usually"....it doesn't take much to get gasoline to vaporize.
Make a puddle on a HOT ground and you'll have enough vapors to start a fire.
The problem is, the match is put out long before it's able to burn off
enough vapors to start the reaction it needs. But make no mistake, it "can"
happen. Also if you hold the match to the end of the puddle you'll have
your fire. Just don't extinguish the source of the fire too quickly.

Another example would be, take any form of gas that is flammable and light a
match. It catches fire. Now compress that gas and blow the gas on the
match. The match goes out. Same thing.

Or, you can do it like Hollywood does it. Use a GEL BASED source of fire.
For example, a gel based match and throw that in your puddle of gasoline.
Burn baby burn!

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

Here it is again:

No, I understand the search feature is important to people that have to
contstantly search their HD's for something, but simply pointing out that
this seems to be the best feature in Vista, based upon the fact that 'off
the top of my head' responses just about always mention searching first.

Who said best? I'd say it's the top PRODUCTIVITY feature. You are trying
to specifically address productivity. You were given a productivity
example.

I'm not rying to prove anything. I was simply picking apart the sentence
quoted above. XP doing 'whatever' not as well, to me, not as well, is the
users skills, vision, techniques, etc.

Well, leave skill out of it. Vista is much more productive for my use and
I've explain how in a few different example. That's what you wanted, that's
what you got.

Running IE & OE are pointless anyway no matter what OS.

Wow, that's all you have to say? I picked two non-resource intensive apps
to illustrate a point. If you didn't get it then that's on you.

Let's try an example of a program that is a real world business
application, not some distributed computing crapplication....

Above you state......'However, in a business setting being organized has
nothing to do with it nor does it negate the feature.'

Folding@Home is by far NOT a business application.

What percentage's of businesses would allow you to run Folding@Home
anyway.

Holy crap!!!!!!!! You complain about my business example so I gave you a
HOME example. Now you complain about the home example?

This is quickly becoming a waste of time.

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

I said QUICK EXAMPLE! Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick WHATEVER
application you want. I picked one that RAPES a CPU to the fullest. I used
a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your boat then roll with it.
The same goes with those as well.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ?

No, you made a specific comment on how, what I said, was not inline with
your previous comment. It didn't have to be. Like I said, I wasn't
replying to you.

If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

Read above.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.

You do not need to concur. The linux freaks already have. This has ALL
been discussed before and in great length in this NG already.

Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

You should read up on WIM and it's advantages, specifically bare-metal
installations.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

Awesome!

 

[DanS]

Nope, wrong reply.

I was looking for a reply as to why running Folding@Home on my 7 year old
computer does not tie up (or seem to have any effect on speed at all) the
PC like you claim it did in your XP, but not Vista.

I just tried it here @ work on a P4/3Ghz PC w/XP SP2 with the same
results, sort of. For some reason XP will only allow it 50% of the CPU
time, as opposed to at home where FAHcore_78.exe is allotted a full 100%.

Either way, it doesn't matter. I still saw absolutely no problems running
Folding@Home on 2 completely different PC's.

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

WTF is going on? This is the fourth attempt to post this:

No, I understand the search feature is important to people that have to
contstantly search their HD's for something, but simply pointing out that
this seems to be the best feature in Vista, based upon the fact that 'off
the top of my head' responses just about always mention searching first.

Who said best? I'd say it's the top PRODUCTIVITY feature. You are trying
to specifically address productivity. You were given a productivity
example.

I'm not rying to prove anything. I was simply picking apart the sentence
quoted above. XP doing 'whatever' not as well, to me, not as well, is the
users skills, vision, techniques, etc.

Well, leave skill out of it. Vista is much more productive for my use and
I've explain how in a few different example. That's what you wanted, that's
what you got.

Running IE & OE are pointless anyway no matter what OS.

Wow, that's all you have to say? I picked two non-resource intensive apps
to illustrate a point. If you didn't get it then that's on you.

Let's try an example of a program that is a real world business
application, not some distributed computing crapplication....

Above you state......'However, in a business setting being organized has
nothing to do with it nor does it negate the feature.'

Folding@Home is by far NOT a business application.

What percentage's of businesses would allow you to run Folding@Home
anyway.

You complained about my business example so I gave you a
HOME example. Now you complain about the home example?

This is quickly becoming a waste of time.

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

I said QUICK example. Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick WHATEVER
application you want. I picked one that RAPES a CPU to the fullest. I used
a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your boat then roll with it.
The same goes with those as well.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ?

No, you made a specific comment on how, what I said, was not inline with
your previous comment. It didn't have to be. Like I said, I wasn't
replying to you.

If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

Read above.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.

You do not need to concur. The linux freaks already have. This has ALL
been discussed before and in great length in this NG already.

Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

You should read up on WIM and it's advantages, specifically bare-metal
installations.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

Awesome!

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

WTH is going on? This is the fifth attempt to post this. Here's the SECOND
HALF:

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

I said QUICK example. Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick WHATEVER
application you want. I picked one that RAPES a CPU to the fullest. I used
a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your boat then roll with it.
The same goes with those as well.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ?

No, you made a specific comment on how, what I said, was not inline with
your previous comment. It didn't have to be. Like I said, I wasn't
replying to you.

If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

Read above.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.

You do not need to concur. The linux freaks already have. This has ALL
been discussed before and in great length in this NG already.

Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

You should read up on WIM and it's advantages, specifically bare-metal
installations.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

Awesome!

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

WTH is going on? This is the fifth attempt to post this. Here's the FIRST
HALF:

No, I understand the search feature is important to people that have to
contstantly search their HD's for something, but simply pointing out that
this seems to be the best feature in Vista, based upon the fact that 'off
the top of my head' responses just about always mention searching first.

Who said best? I'd say it's the top PRODUCTIVITY feature. You are trying
to specifically address productivity. You were given a productivity
example.

I'm not rying to prove anything. I was simply picking apart the sentence
quoted above. XP doing 'whatever' not as well, to me, not as well, is the
users skills, vision, techniques, etc.

Well, leave skill out of it. Vista is much more productive for my use and
I've explain how in a few different example. That's what you wanted, that's
what you got.

Running IE & OE are pointless anyway no matter what OS.

Wow, that's all you have to say? I picked two non-resource intensive apps
to illustrate a point. If you didn't get it then that's on you.

Let's try an example of a program that is a real world business
application, not some distributed computing crapplication....

Above you state......'However, in a business setting being organized has
nothing to do with it nor does it negate the feature.'

Folding@Home is by far NOT a business application.

What percentage's of businesses would allow you to run Folding@Home
anyway.

You complained about my business example so I gave you a
HOME example. Now you complain about the home example?

This is quickly becoming a waste of time.

 

[Justin]

So come on. Why no reply ? You can't explain it ?

WTH is going on? This is the fifth attempt to post this. Here's the SECOND
HALF:

Now if you would have used MP3 encoding, or rendering a 90 minutes video
in Adobe Premiere, or running an RF PCB simulation in Agilent ADS, as an
example, that would have come across as much more of a real comparison.

I said QUICK example. Plus it proves my point. Yes, you can pick WHATEVER
application you want. I picked one that KILLS a CPU to the fullest. I used
a worse case scenario. If the above apps float your boat then roll with it.
The same goes with those as well.

So what, I can't comment on anything else you've said unless it's in a
direct reply to me ?

No, you made a specific comment on how, what I said, was not inline with
your previous comment. It didn't have to be. Like I said, I wasn't
replying to you.

If that's the case, take your discussions to e-mail
and don't post in globally, publicly accessible newsgroups for anyone to
read.

Read above.

Your comment that 'Linux can do that!' It probably does, but I can't
concur, as I haven't used Linux.

You do not need to concur. The linux freaks already have. This has ALL
been discussed before and in great length in this NG already.

Well I would have assumed HD images, but I couldn't make a connection of
having 10 XP machines and 10 Vista machines, and needing less images for
backup of the Vista machines. I would think a PC HD image is a PC HD
image.

You should read up on WIM and it's advantages, specifically bare-metal
installations.

What's odd is that you didn't pick that up as being sarcastic.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

Well,
sarcastic in the big picture anyway. You're typical home user's has no
clue what AD is, nor do they want/need to know.

Actually, what's odd is that YOU didn't pick up on my being sarcastic.

I did run a Win2K3 Domain at the house for a while and do know 3 other
people that have currently domains at their homes.

Awesome!

 

[DanS]

WTH is going on? This is the fifth attempt to post this. Here's the
SECOND HALF:

Again, not the post I was referring to.

Maybe you'd get some better results going thru GG instead of using your
Vista Live Mail client for Usenet.

 

[Justin]

Again, not the post I was referring to.

Again?

1. That's the first time you mentioned a wrong reply.

2. Then what the heck are you referring to? That's a direct (2 part) reply
to your previous post. Maybe try asking for a reply FROM the actual post
you want a reply to.

Maybe you'd get some better results going thru GG instead of using your
Vista Live Mail client for Usenet.

Nope, wrong. I narrowed down the problem by splitting it up. The MS news
server is filtering out the word "RAP.ES" as in Folding@Home RAP.ES the
CPU. I had to change it to KILLS. Friggen lame!