MacHeads often toss this one out there.
Has it occurred to you that if there were more Mac users that there
might be more effort devoted toward ruining their day?
Ah, the old, "if there were more" argument. I used to hear it when I
worked as an admin in an environment that was looking to migrate from
NetWare to Windows. "If there were more NetWare servers, there would
be more attacks on the OS," is how it would be argued. Curiously, you
never heard about NetWare attacks even though major banks, governments
and other secure industries used them, but we required entire teams of
people to try to manage the Windows side of the house. The reason
that there were not "more" NetWare servers was because we didn't need
them. I could easily handle several hundred users for file/print, ftp
and other services on a single or maybe a two server configuration for
major sites that needed redundancy. The reason that there were "more
Windows" servers was because when they replaced a single NetWare box,
they did so with multiple MS boxes due to instability.
But I know that this is not really the discussion ... so if the "if
there were more" argument were valid, why does Apache not receive the
attention that IIS does for cracks and hacks?