Hi, Boris ... I have been running Vista since the day it was released
to the public. I have had a lot of problems with Vista and recently
became quite discouraged about it.
But I am not going to go back to XP. Some users who have posted in
these Vista-related newsgroups do not like User Account Control (UAC)
and disable it. UAC is the number one reason I will stay with Vista.
There are other good reasons but UAC is the main benefit. Better
security is the right direction for any future OS.
Most of my problems have been with legacy hardware or with software
that says it is Vista compatible but, in truth, is not quite there
yet.
You may have no problems at all with Vista ... it is definitely far
more secure, straight out of the box, than XP.
Post back and let us know what you decide to do and how it is going
... vanilla
Hi, Vanilla,
Thanks for the reply, and I generall agree with you.
Hmmm...I'm not at all conerned about security, so I really don't care if
Vista is supposed to be more secure. With six machines in the house,
over 10 years, I've never had a problem with security (viruses, trojans,
spam, spyware). I can secure my own machines. I'm more 'aware' than
most users. (Please don't think that I took any offense by your note.
I'm just stating my position.)
Perhaps I've been lucky, but on my newest laptop, which I operate almost
entirely wirelessly, I didn't install any anti-virus software because,
like I said, I've never had any malware problems. The laptop has gotten
regular use for about a year now, and it's suffered no attacks. The only
security I have on it is the default Microsoft XPHome firewall.
All my other machines have the Microsoft firewall, and only Free Avast!
or McAfee subscription (not the suite, just the anti-virus), and none of
the machines has suffered an attack.
I also use AdAware Personal and HiJackThis, and nothing's ever been
found. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I sometimes think that the
anti-malware companies hype the dangers out there. After all, it means
sales.
I'm not going to be running Vista on any legacy hardware. I'm going to
buy a new machine that will be more than Vista capable.
What I worry about is the intrusions that Vista makes into my computing
habits. From what I've heard, either from newsgroups, forums, or friends
that use Vista, it's just full of nag screens that are supposed to help
the unexperienced user stay secure. I once tried Microsoft Defender, and
I hated it because of all the "are you sure you want to do this" screens.
This is what I envision Vista to be like.
Another aprehension of mine is that some of the programs I like to use
won't work under Vista. Some are 'legacy' programs (Nero 5, DAK 2000 MP3
Wav Editor, and the older versions of AIM...guess I can use Trillian or
Gain).
Next, I worry about networking to all of my XPHome or WMCE machines in
the house, or even the wireless networks on my laptops. Yeah, maybe I'm
a little paranoid about this aspect of Vista.
I also worry about, as you say, programs that are supposed to work under
Vista, not working.
Finally, I'm not really all that impresseed about the new Vista GUI.
It's just another GUI.
But, in the end, when all is said and done, I'll probably go with Vista
because it's the OS that will be used from now on. Also, I support my
freinds and relatives machines, and if they ever move up from XP, I'll
know how to support them.
Thanks again for your reply. I'll let you know what I do.