J
J. P. Gilliver (John)
In message <[email protected]>, glee <[email protected]>
writes:
[]
(I suppose they'd ask "why".)
But Firefox does.
My main dislike of IE is its excessive integration: plus, lately, I've
noticed when it is having trouble with some page, it makes the whole of
the PC assume more treacle-like-ness. However, other's MMV.
writes:
[]
updates Microsoft products as well as MSE. Yes, a better solution
would be to have a separate updater built into MSE that didn't rely on
Windows Update.
(I suppose they'd ask "why".)
On a side not, MSE did not fare well in the latest 0-day infection
tests, and should be watched for future results. If it doesn't
improve, I may have to stop recommending it as a free AV.
I get a chuckle when people go on about how they refuse to allow
Microsoft to update Windows and IE, then run Firefox or Chrome as a
browser.... both of which automatically update to new versions very
often. Chrome does not even give you an option to turn off
But Firefox does.
updating.... Chrome also includes its own integrated version of Flash
Player which is often behind in security updates compared to the Flash
plugin from Adobe. Unless you manually disable the integrated Flash
and install the plugin, you run the risk of infection through the
integrated Flash not being updated quickly. I'd be much more
concerned about high-risk infection vectors such as that, than
knee-jerk anti-MS sentiments.
My main dislike of IE is its excessive integration: plus, lately, I've
noticed when it is having trouble with some page, it makes the whole of
the PC assume more treacle-like-ness. However, other's MMV.