As to not knowing about highly used utilities, why don't you know?
Which is a highly useful product? I don;t need such utilities, frankly, and
my system is in great shape as always. I did of course use System Mechanic
(not the newer version) in the past (9x days) and it does the MRU cleaning
job just fine, but no real performance gain in a hight-end system nowadays.
Just IMO.
If you consider an utility as "highly used" or "highly useful", then go
ahead and recommend it. No one is stopping you. BTW, I'm not at all
interested in these type of conversations and this will be my last post in
this thread whatsoever.
--
Regards,
Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting
http://www.winhelponline.com
Today Ramesh, MS-MVP commented courteously on the subject at
hand
I did not comment anything about JV16. There are plenty of
such utilities and each person will have his own
preferences. I can't comment on a product or make any
recommendations of a product of which I don;t have any
knowledge.
Do you think ShellExView a Microsoft product? It's from
Nirsoft and I highly recommend that product.
try, try, try, and you'll MVPs will never be able to live down
what the "M in your name means - you've sold out for unpaid -
but undisclosed - bennies as a M$ shill.
As to not knowing about highly used utilities, why don't you
know? M$ doesn't offer classes in their competition, fine. Learn
it on your own, else you'll not be able to offer non-M$ advice,
which only strengthens my view of the average MVP. I find them
useful /if/ my problem is strictly Windoze and /if/ they've
actually read my OP, but frequently the latter is violated as is
easy to spot immediately because cites into the MS KB I've been
given in the past aren't even remotely relevant.