John said:
Who said you have to be "coddling and pandering to employees"? It is
not a statement that I made.
Not a direct statement, no. But you certainly seemed to imply that the
offending employees should be allowed to do pretty much as they liked,
without any consequence beyond a "stern talking to." That would be what
I call "coddling and pandering."
You can tell the employees what the
company policy is but if you don't take proper measures to properly lock
down the workstations going about threatening to fire the employees is
the wrong way to go about things or to address the problem.
John
Well, if all you ever do is "threaten" without following through, you'd
have a point. But if you actually terminate the offender(s) (and it's
for cause, so they not eligible for unemployment benefits in most
locales), and make it clear to the remaining employees just why their
"co-workers" are no longer drawing a paycheck, you'll have far fewer
problems in the future. And no one's suggesting that a first offense be
greeted with termination; some other, milder disciplinary action can be
tried first. Repeat offenders, however, need to be show the door,
period, for the good of the company and morale.
Mind you, if the company's acceptable computer/network usage policies
aren't clearly spelled out in advance, there could be, in some
jurisdictions, legal obstacles to terminating such employees. The IT
department needs to work with the HR department to ensure that all
employees are informed of the company's policies, immediately upon being
offered employment.
--
Bruce Chambers
Help us help you:
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin
Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell