You agreed to it and this has been ranted about before. You don't have
to allow automatic updates - it's an OPTION YOU AGREE TOO.
Personally, I think there is a distinct difference between "Automatic
Update" and "Automatic Reboot".
Just generally speaking, having software automatically update itself if I
wish it to do so is fine but having it automatically *reboot*, with
potential disastrous results, my computer is not.
To me, something like that applies as much to Windows as it does to any
other piece of software.
Most people don't equate "Automatic Update" with "Automatic reboot".
No software should ever automatically reboot the computer unless
explicitly being allowed to do so and this permission only being valid
for that one single-time.
On a home computer an automatic reboot may not be all that disastrous
(though still most certainly could be). No extended harm is going to come
from someone losing their solitaire high score. But on an office computer
however, such results could be extremely disastrous and result in severe
data loss.
Now with regard to microsoft, on one hand they majorly push people to
activate automatic update. Vista will whine and moan and bitch in the
systray if you don't (and don't turn off it's moaning as well) and when
the user is presented with the choices, the wording is meant to make the
user choose automatic updates. Essentially I see where Microsoft is
coming from and that's all good and fine.
However, what is not fine is MS then going ahead and having it
automatically reboot the machine as the results are going to be
unpredictable and could cause severe data loss. It also doesn't state
anything about automatically rebooting when you make this choice. It just
simply states automatic updates.
So as far as I am concerned, the original poster has every single right
to be pissed off about this.
--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6
å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯
å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰