Never used it. My point was that I don't have an issue with
register-ware.
Or was your post directed elsewhere?
i have not read the charter, but i would propose the following as
acceptable and non-acceptable:
betas -- unrestricted betas that don't expire is close to freeware. esp
betas that are legally traded on P2P and freeware sites. if it's a
time-restricted beta then it's closer to shareware or trialware and
shouldn't meet the requirements.
trials -- BootItNG would not qualify as freeware IMHO.
F/OSS -- truly free software like FreeBSD and Slackware should meet the
requirements for freeware. it is zero cost, can be freely
redistributed, and adds the additional freedom of being open-source.
registration required, distribution limited -- stuff like the Borland
C++ compiler is not freeware by the strict definition, however it should
meet the requirements for posting.
open-source, not free as in beer -- stuff like SuSE Personal costs
money, and doesn't meet the free requirement. it can however be
redistributed to friends so it is free in a sense after the initial
purchase is made.
crippleware -- stuff that has certain features of freeware should
qualify IMO as long as the license permits unlimited use at no cost.
freeware -- true freeware is free in every sense except often being
closed-source.
michael