Acronis offering True Image 7 for free - Is it worth the price?

I

isotobin

http://www.acronis.com/mag/vnu-ati7



I've read others here say it was a little buggy, yet some past messages
indicate it did a good job.

Would it be a good test to create an image of several directories and just
restore them to a different partition (if possible). Is there a better
test of the program, before I part with the cash for ver 10?
 
B

Bucky Breeder

(e-mail address removed) wrote in
http://[could be bogus... could be funny...]/mag/vnu-ati7

I've read others here say it was a little buggy, yet some past messages
indicate it did a good job.

Would it be a good test to create an image of several directories and just
restore them to a different partition (if possible). Is there a better
test of the program, before I part with the cash for ver 10?


Since v10 is out for a while... All that personal information... Oh sure,
could be legitimate.


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
S

Smirnoff

Bucky said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote in
http://[could be bogus... could be funny...]/mag/vnu-ati7

I've read others here say it was a little buggy, yet some past messages
indicate it did a good job.

Would it be a good test to create an image of several directories and
just restore them to a different partition (if possible). Is there a
better test of the program, before I part with the cash for ver 10?


Since v10 is out for a while... All that personal information... Oh sure,
could be legitimate.


Just tried the site. Offer has expired.
 
B

Bucky Breeder

Bucky said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote in
http://[could be bogus... could be funny...]/mag/vnu-ati7

I've read others here say it was a little buggy, yet some past messages
indicate it did a good job.

Would it be a good test to create an image of several directories and
just restore them to a different partition (if possible). Is there a
better test of the program, before I part with the cash for ver 10?


Since v10 is out for a while... All that personal information... Oh sure,
could be legitimate.


Just tried the site. Offer has expired.


Another close call... and once again the world has been saved! <whew>

(o; Cheers, and thanks for the follow-up.


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
B

Bucky Breeder

Jörg Schneider said:
Just tried the site. Offer is still valid.


Super cool! Since it seems to be working for you there, fill out the forms
and tell us what happens, please. Thanks!


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
J

Jörg Schneider

Bucky said:
Super cool! Since it seems to be working for you there, fill out the
forms
and tell us what happens, please. Thanks!

What did you expect to happen? I got a registration e-mail with login
information. After logging into my account on their website I saw a menu
with all the links regarding TrueImage 7: download link, link to updates,
serial number etc.

The *only* information you have to provide are
a )your firstname and lastname and
b) a valid e-mail account.

Since a) doesn't have to be real and Spamgourmet and others exist for b), I
don't really understand what your problem is?

Jörg
 
B

Bucky Breeder

What did you expect to happen? I got a registration e-mail with login
information. After logging into my account on their website I saw a menu
with all the links regarding TrueImage 7: download link, link to
updates, serial number etc.

The *only* information you have to provide are
a )your firstname and lastname and
b) a valid e-mail account.

Since a) doesn't have to be real and Spamgourmet and others exist for
b), I don't really understand what your problem is?

Jörg


You are so emotionally involved in this, ehh?

My "problem" was that I was getting an "Offer now invalid" but now that
you've been so nice with the abundance of information, I'll keep on trying
back... Because I always wanted an obsolete by 3 versions software in my
free stuff folder.


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
B

Bucky Breeder

Sorry to disappoint you, but errr... no.


Thanks again for checking it out - and for the verifying info!


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
T

thanatoid

(e-mail address removed) wrote in
http://www.acronis.com/mag/vnu-ati7



I've read others here say it was a little buggy, yet some
past messages indicate it did a good job.

Would it be a good test to create an image of several
directories and just restore them to a different partition
(if possible). Is there a better test of the program,
before I part with the cash for ver 10?

I use a 4 year old version of Acronis which came FREE on a CD
with a British computer magazine and it is the MOST
INDISPENSABLE program I have. The fact Acronis continues to give
away the older versions for free is nothing short of
astonishing.

Whether you want to pay for version 10 is your business. I have
NEVER had ANY problems with MY version. Newer is not always
better.

t.
 
B

Bucky Breeder

(e-mail address removed) wrote in
http://www.acronis.com/mag/vnu-ati7

I've read others here say it was a little buggy, yet some past messages
indicate it did a good job.

Would it be a good test to create an image of several directories and
just restore them to a different partition (if possible). Is there a
better test of the program, before I part with the cash for ver 10?


A lot depends on your machine OS, and how would you restore if your OS got
totally trashed. A back-up image software is so essential IMHO, that I
believe 'shame-on-Microsoft' for not including a good one with their OS's.

A lot of people use older versions of Norton Ghost and absolutely swear by
it. I still use PowerQuest Drive Image 2002 on several machines that use a
floppy disk access recovery procedure with absolute dependability.

My problem with Acronis roots back to a few years ago when I tried it, and
upon an image-restore-operation it tampered with the cluster sizes on a
large HDD... I ended up restoring to backed-up PowerQuest image, and
problem was resolved. That could have been unique to my HDD or something.

I would say that it's good practice to get the software, then do a complete
image, then do a restore to see if it works, how it works, etc. Of course
the fear of doing it the first time is always "what if it doesn't work or
trashes the system?" I don't know if there's an answer to that IRL. For
every person who uses a backup software with success, there's one out there
that says... you know, the usual, "it trashed my machine."

"Newer" is not always "better" with software, but newer software is
sometimes more compatible with newer systems; to wit, a recovery routine
that only uses floppy disks is rather cumbersome on a machine that depends
on CD bootable media.

With a freeware, you could always try it out before you buy the newer
version, which I think is good for end-users as well as a smart marketing
strategy, because people are becoming increasingly aware that image backups
are really prudent policy for both home and business users, and because
most folks seem to stay loyal to their first backup software's brand,
probably because it is so scary the first time you do it.

But the good news is that once you do it, it is so incredibly fast and easy
that it really doesn't make sense not to do it.


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
I

isotobin

Super cool! Since it seems to be working for you there, fill out the
forms and tell us what happens, please. Thanks!

Why should it be anything other than legit? It's an acronis.com link.
If you buy the program, you have to give them info anyway.
At the very worst, it's tied in with some computer magazine. What's a few
more spam e-mails? At least these may have some decent article links!
 
I

isotobin

I use a 4 year old version of Acronis which came FREE on a CD
with a British computer magazine and it is the MOST
INDISPENSABLE program I have. The fact Acronis continues to give
away the older versions for free is nothing short of
astonishing.

Whether you want to pay for version 10 is your business. I have
NEVER had ANY problems with MY version. Newer is not always
better.

What version and what magazine? Was it Personal Computer World which seems
to have the tie-in here?
 
B

Bucky Breeder

(e-mail address removed) wrote in
Why should it be anything other than legit? It's an acronis.com link.
If you buy the program, you have to give them info anyway.
At the very worst, it's tied in with some computer magazine. What's a
few more spam e-mails? At least these may have some decent article
links!


I think he did too, and I responded to him with my thanks.


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
I

isotobin

(e-mail address removed) wrote in


I would say that it's good practice to get the software, then do a
complete image, then do a restore to see if it works, how it works,
etc. Of course the fear of doing it the first time is always "what if
it doesn't work or trashes the system?" I don't know if there's an
answer to that IRL. For every person who uses a backup software with
success, there's one out there that says... you know, the usual, "it
trashed my machine."

"Newer" is not always "better" with software, but newer software is
sometimes more compatible with newer systems; to wit, a recovery
routine that only uses floppy disks is rather cumbersome on a machine
that depends on CD bootable media.

With a freeware, you could always try it out before you buy the newer
version, which I think is good for end-users as well as a smart
marketing strategy, because people are becoming increasingly aware
that image backups are really prudent policy for both home and
business users, and because most folks seem to stay loyal to their
first backup software's brand, probably because it is so scary the
first time you do it.

But the good news is that once you do it, it is so incredibly fast and
easy that it really doesn't make sense not to do it.


I see that you're now assured it's a legit url, Bucky.
Thanks for the comments. You're quite informative when you want to be.
I think I'll play around with it, but I'll probably order ver. 10 after
awhile. Most of the network ops seem to prefer it over Norton Ghost.

It's amazing how many advanced users refuse to touch a Norton/Symantec
product. I've always felt McAfee insinuates itself in far too many areas
of the OS and registry. Norton does as well. They both remind of
Realplayer which I stopped installing several years ago in favor of Media
Player Classic with Real Alternative. All three are productive pieces of
software but are bothersome in that they become harmless spyware, always
contacting the net through open ports looking for updates or passing info
along.

Even McAfee's Site Advisor, which I think is indispensible until Google
gets their url ratings going, is adding a service now and forcing you to
visit their purchase page before you can see the detailed info on a site.

Sorry to digress.
 
B

Bucky Breeder

(e-mail address removed) wrote in
I see that you're now assured it's a legit url, Bucky.
Thanks for the comments. You're quite informative when you want to be.
I think I'll play around with it, but I'll probably order ver. 10 after
awhile. Most of the network ops seem to prefer it over Norton Ghost.

It's amazing how many advanced users refuse to touch a Norton/Symantec
product. I've always felt McAfee insinuates itself in far too many areas
of the OS and registry. Norton does as well. They both remind of
Realplayer which I stopped installing several years ago in favor of Media
Player Classic with Real Alternative. All three are productive pieces of
software but are bothersome in that they become harmless spyware, always
contacting the net through open ports looking for updates or passing info
along.

Even McAfee's Site Advisor, which I think is indispensible until Google
gets their url ratings going, is adding a service now and forcing you to
visit their purchase page before you can see the detailed info on a site.

Sorry to digress.


NP in re "digress" because IMHO the discussion about backup imaging really
needs to be out there big. And I'm serious about the 'shame-on-Microsoft'
part for not providing a good one with the OS's. It's just code, and it
would be so easy for them to do. While I don't have a financial dog-in-
the-hunt, it would nearly break my heart to see a bunch of folks getting
burned on the concept of imaging their drives because they got bit on hoaxy
piece of software... Which does *not* appear to be the case hereto. Now I
digress... (o;

Also, I agree with you totally on the McAfee's products insinuating
itselves way deep into [my] system, and then being overbearing with
additional commercial proffers and outgoing connection attempts. While I
was on a Win9x system, I had the same experience, and it really was quite
frustrating cleaning it up once I decided it was calling out too much. And
it's something that now that I'm once bitten, I like to look out for as
well.


Best wishes to all for a safe and joyous holiday season.

--

Higher beings from outer space
may not want to tell us all the secrets of life,
because, in their little grey minds,
we're not quite ready for that advanced step - yet.

But maybe they'll change their superior tune - after a little torture.
 
C

caver1

Jörg Schneider said:
Just tried the site. Offer is still valid.


Just went to the site registered and downloaded. It is a way to try
Acronis. If you like it they hope you will buy 10.
 
M

Mike Echo

Because I always wanted an obsolete by 3 versions software in my
free stuff folder.

Sometimes (a) newer is not better and (b) an old version may do enough
of what you require.

At any rate, I reckon it's worth checking out when offers like this come
up.

R.
 
T

thanatoid

(e-mail address removed) wrote in
What version and what magazine? Was it Personal Computer
World which seems to have the tie-in here?

PC Answers #122, Aug 2003
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top