A SAD SAD REALIZATION

J

Justin

For what, to just get the purchase price back? Even if I could
get that who will pay for my time, effort and grief if I have to
go back to XP? Better to wait for me, you do what you think best
for you, though.

If that's the reason you've come up with then ok. However, no one I know
does that. Please compare that to something else.

You buy a DVR and beat your head with it for a few weeks just to take it
back. Do they compensate you for lost time? No. No one does that.

Next time, try cnet.com if you haven't already. Non-biased reviews and lots
of user reviews.
 
E

Eric

Justin said:
I see what you mean! So people should write their own drivers for Vista
if they don't have them already?

:)
Either that or find someone else to "make the adapter", or get the adapter
from the carburetor manufacturer if they still expect you to be able to use
it. Don't expect the manufacturer of the new car to make it. The car will
either include it's own carburetor, or be designed to fit any carburetor
they expect you to use with it. If your old carburetor doesn't fit and you
insist on using it, and you can't make an adapter and no one will make one
for you, you still have the option of buying an old car that works with it.
 
G

Guest

I don't ordinarily go to blind links, but I assume this is the
Bugatti Veyron (sp?), a world-class sports car in the same class
as a Ferrari Enzo and other Italian ultras, and some one-off cars
built both abroad and in the U.S.

The veron will leave anything made by Ferrari in it's dust.
A W-16 engine that can produce 1,001 horsepower
A top speed of 250+ mph (400+ kph)
A zero-to-60 time of three seconds
A zero-to-180 time of 14 seconds
I will concede to the OP that a
state-of-the-art race bike and/or a max performance ultra bike
CAN exceed ANY car's performance for standard runs like 0-60 and
standing 1/4 mile. Perhaps, even exceed any cars top speed, I'm
less certain of that.

Even a Fomula 1 car? 0-100-0 6.8 seconds. It's got to be some bike to beat
that and a great rider that can handle it.
 
J

Justin

Eric said:
Either that or find someone else to "make the adapter", or get the adapter
from the carburetor manufacturer if they still expect you to be able to
use it. Don't expect the manufacturer of the new car to make it. The car
will either include it's own carburetor, or be designed to fit any
carburetor they expect you to use with it. If your old carburetor doesn't
fit and you insist on using it, and you can't make an adapter and no one
will make one for you, you still have the option of buying an old car that
works with it.

That was perfect! :)

In fact, a group of people started on their own X-Fi driver for creative
labs and pulled of a pretty decent and useful driver. It's not needed now
but it illustrated what you said perfectly.
 
H

HEMI-Powered

Today, Justin made these interesting comments ...
Yes.

1000 AND ONE horsepower. "How do you make the worlds most
powerful car?" Add a ONE to the last record.

It still can't out drag a crotch rocket.
So what? Given enough money and enough time, one can build any kind
of vehicle or bike for any purpose whatsoever, but as the
performance level rises, both the law of diminishing returns comes
into play as does specialization for one purpose being mutually
exclusive for another, e.g., fuel dragsters make shit-ass F-1 or
LeMans cars, and I already joked about the piss-poor A/C on a bike.
 
H

HEMI-Powered

Today, Justin made these interesting comments ...
That's perfectly understandable. Then you might want to note
that the term "'Nuff said." can cause issues thanks to D.
Spencer Hines :) It'll certainly make someone look up your
headers. Hehehe.
If I commented to your last, I'd be violating my own principles.
How, for example, do you know what I may really think of you? I
know what others think, they have you in the same peg hole as DST,
but for different reasons. I'd prefer to get along by going along,
but sometimes some folks let their emotions drive their fingers on
a keyboard faster than their brains can manage the drivel flowing
there from.

Again, 'nuff said.
 
H

HEMI-Powered

Today, Justin made these interesting comments ...
She liked that. So being wise is no fun? Hehehe...
Back about this time in 2002, I got a bug up my ass to buy a Viper
GTS and found one about an hour's drive from me. The dealer
would've let me test drive it, but my wife crawled in, sat down and
declared "the door is too small, the seats are too hard, I'm too
cramped and there aren't any cupholders, so if you want to buy this
thing, go ahead, just plan on driving by yourself!" Bless you,
dear, you just saved me some $75K even with my EP.
 
H

HEMI-Powered

Today, Justin made these interesting comments ...
If that's the reason you've come up with then ok. However, no
one I know does that. Please compare that to something else.

You buy a DVR and beat your head with it for a few weeks just
to take it back. Do they compensate you for lost time? No.
No one does that.

Next time, try cnet.com if you haven't already. Non-biased
reviews and lots of user reviews.
Justin, there is NO such thing as an unbiased review. Whether any
of us want to admit it or not, ALL reviews of anything ARE
biased, through the eyes of the reviewers and the extent to which
they use lab vs. theoretical concepts vs. real-world "testing" to
reach their conclusions. I stopped looking in on cnet.com and
dpreview.com for cameras years ago. Ditto for the magazines,
whose "bias" comes from the business need to sell magazines and
not lose ad income by trashing some car, camera, computer,
whatever. This is a PC world, meaning "politically correct" and
it is patently impossible to get truely unbiased "opinions".
Besides, who's to say that what the N testers did or didn't do is
at all what you plan to do? Easy example: I pounded my head for a
year trying to get even ONE opinion on using flash to take
pictures of cars in a museum. I'll talk about that saga some
other time, thank you.
 
H

HEMI-Powered

Today, =?Utf-8?B?Y2FubmE=?= made these interesting comments ...
The veron will leave anything made by Ferrari in it's dust.
A W-16 engine that can produce 1,001 horsepower
A top speed of 250+ mph (400+ kph)
A zero-to-60 time of three seconds
A zero-to-180 time of 14 seconds

If one looks at the limitions caused by F=MA, coefficient of
friction for tires, and some other easy to understand physics
concepts, one can decide that the amount of hp necessary to get
there much quicker than a Veyron - however it is spelled - takes
not 1,002, but at least 2,000, 4,000, maybe higher. Absent any
issues with basic physics, it becomes a power-to-weight issue as
was pointed out earlier. But, as the saying goes, all other
factors being equal but they never are ...
Even a Fomula 1 car? 0-100-0 6.8 seconds. It's got to be some
bike to beat that and a great rider that can handle it.
You're illustrating my point exactly. F-1s, LeMans race cars,
today's "rail" dragsters, road race cars, land speed record cars,
anything can approach specs for any criteria of performance that
boggles the mind. But, what they cannot do is carry 4 people and
their luggage on a long highway jaunt, as can the cars that
Justin and I have been lightheartedly debating.

And with that, I'll let the bikers have they say.
 
H

HEMI-Powered

Today, Justin made these interesting comments ...
http://jalopnik.com/cars/custom-cars%2fhot-rods%3a-tuners/s
uper-skyline-mercedespowered-1000-hp-v12-151163.php

0-60 in 3 seconds

????
I've "heard" about "street" times of under 2.5, but when one
examines the definitions, who was driving, and the way the
"test" was done, one leaves the world of the real and enters that
of the surreal. Easy example:

I have a friend who has a hopped up 2005 Dodge SRT-4, what you
and I know as a Neon. He has a Stage II or III set of Mopar
Performance kits on it and is in the range of a Viper. But, I
tried to bet him a lunch that I could take him with my Charger 8
out of 10 times. He declined. But, my logic was this: he's got a
stick shift; if he doesn't heel-and-toe for enough boost at
launch, he bogs, and I win. If he lights up the front tires, I
win. So, if he gets it exactly right, and the fuzz still haven't
arrived, he CAN take me. But, to do my stint, all I have to do is
a Sally Field - "I put the medal to the pedal and the thing to
the floor" and let those 340 ponies breathe through a convoluted
exhaust system and "only" 5 gears in the automagical tranny.
 
J

Justin

HEMI-Powered said:
If I commented to your last, I'd be violating my own principles.
How, for example, do you know what I may really think of you?

I don't and never applied that I did.
I
know what others think, they have you in the same peg hole as DST,
but for different reasons.

Sorry, but adam, nina and arachnid mean nothing to me. Hell, even alias and
I had decent words for the last two days. How, for example, do you know
that I care what they think?
I'd prefer to get along by going along,
but sometimes some folks let their emotions drive their fingers on
a keyboard faster than their brains can manage the drivel flowing
there from.

Again, 'nuff said.

If you say so. I see patterns in this NG and I saw something that raised a
flag. I gave some half jokingly friendly advice. Do with it as you will.
 
J

Justin

HEMI-Powered said:
Justin, there is NO such thing as an unbiased review. Whether any
of us want to admit it or not, ALL reviews of anything ARE
biased, through the eyes of the reviewers and the extent to which
they use lab vs. theoretical concepts vs. real-world "testing" to
reach their conclusions. I stopped looking in on cnet.com and
dpreview.com for cameras years ago. Ditto for the magazines,
whose "bias" comes from the business need to sell magazines and
not lose ad income by trashing some car, camera, computer,
whatever. This is a PC world, meaning "politically correct" and
it is patently impossible to get truely unbiased "opinions".
Besides, who's to say that what the N testers did or didn't do is
at all what you plan to do? Easy example: I pounded my head for a
year trying to get even ONE opinion on using flash to take
pictures of cars in a museum. I'll talk about that saga some
other time, thank you.

Hum, something seems out of context here. Is the fact that nothing is
perfect up for questioning?

If I can find a source that at any given point in time has given a
particular model from ALL VENDORS 5 stars then I consider that non-bias.

Plus, more times then not the user reviews are within par of the cnet
review.

Plus, don't skip over the power of user reviews. It just takes time to sort
out the BS.
 
A

Adam Albright

Sorry, but adam, nina and arachnid mean nothing to me. Hell, even alias and
I had decent words for the last two days. How, for example, do you know
that I care what they think?

You CARE what other people think of you which is why you go on and on
trying to defend the garbage you keep posting. Sorry if that's too big
a dose of truth for you to swallow. ;-)
 
A

Adam Albright

Hum, something seems out of context here. Is the fact that nothing is
perfect up for questioning?

If I can find a source that at any given point in time has given a
particular model from ALL VENDORS 5 stars then I consider that non-bias.

That's because you seem very inmature and some of your seniors see
right through your obvious BS. You told us you have a "test lab",
you've told us you had 20 machines or some such number, then a few
days ago that ballooned to 500 if I recall correctly. You live a
Walter Mitty existance. I have a hard time accepting you do much of
anything since we find you here early morning on late into the night.
If you had a job, especially what you hint at, you wouldn't have so
much time to goof of posting to backwater newsgroups. I see you as
phony as a three dollar bill. You get mad at me and others because
you know we know. ;-)

Since I'm semi-retired and have run two successful businesses I can
afford to goof off here all I want. I'm sure you would bring it up, so
answered in advance. ;-)
Plus, more times then not the user reviews are within par of the cnet
review.

Plus, don't skip over the power of user reviews. It just takes time to sort
out the BS.

And of course you fancy yourself the authority to do that. <snicker>
 
J

Justin

Adam Albright said:
You CARE what other people think of you which is why you go on and on
trying to defend the garbage you keep posting. Sorry if that's too big
a dose of truth for you to swallow. ;-)

If that's how you see things then good for you.
 
S

Stephan Rose

HEMI-Powered said:
You're illustrating my point exactly. F-1s, LeMans race cars,
today's "rail" dragsters, road race cars, land speed record cars,
anything can approach specs for any criteria of performance that
boggles the mind. But, what they cannot do is carry 4 people and
their luggage on a long highway jaunt, as can the cars that
Justin and I have been lightheartedly debating.

And with that, I'll let the bikers have they say.

Hahaha! Well...a goldwing can't carry 4 people, but it will carry 2 people
and luggage no problem. =)

Not that you'd ever catch me riding one!! That thing is half a car
already...

--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6

å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„出ã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯
å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰
 
J

Justin

Hum...adam seems to be trolling again.

That's because you seem very inmature and some of your seniors see
right through your obvious BS.

Some? Please back up your mouth with facts.
You told us you have a "test lab",

Yeah, so?
you've told us you had 20 machines or some such number, then a few

You'll have to provide a link to that. The only sense the number 20 makes
on my network is the number of Macs we have.

I'm guessing that since EVEN YOU have admitted you don't read everything and
how many people have PROVEN you do not read correctly, you probably miss
read something somewhere. However, if you can provide a link or subject
line then I can go back and see what happened. If I made a mistake then
I'll admit as such. That's the biggest difference between you and I.
days ago that ballooned to 500 if I recall correctly. You live a

Nope, you recall very incorrectly. You always do. Again provide a link. I
have 300+ PCs.
Walter Mitty existance.

More adam garbage.
I have a hard time accepting you do much of
anything since we find you here early morning on late into the night.

Yes, LATE into the night. Once the family has gone to bed. Unless I get
bored and something only my wife likes to watch is currently playing.
If you had a job, especially what you hint at, you wouldn't have so
much time to goof of posting to backwater newsgroups.

Backwater? More adam garbage.
This is the plus side of being the boss!
I see you as
phony as a three dollar bill.

Good for you!
You get mad at me and others because
you know we know. ;-)

How do you know I know you know you know?
Since I'm semi-retired and have run two successful businesses I can
afford to goof off here all I want. I'm sure you would bring it up, so
answered in advance. ;-)

You're sure I would bring up your life? You ASSume way to much.

Yup, I get a lot practice from people such as yourself.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

A SAD SAD REALIZATION 9
Very Sad..... 2
How Sad... 2
Sad and then happy 2
The Sad History of Vista 6
A sad day indeed! 6
Black Screen Of Death (Sad Story) 5
The SAD World of AlexB 9

Top