L
Leythos
Leythos said:and this applies to ALL OS'S [sic].
--
Don't mean to be picky but plurals NEVER use an apostrophe.
Yea, but who's going to understand OSS

Leythos said:and this applies to ALL OS'S [sic].
--
Don't mean to be picky but plurals NEVER use an apostrophe.
Leythos said:Leythos said:and this applies to ALL OS'S [sic].
--
Don't mean to be picky but plurals NEVER use an apostrophe.
Yea, but who's going to understand OSS![]()
OSs. Or, you could spell it out: operating systems.Leythos said:
Alias
Leythos said:OSs. Or, you could spell it out: operating systems.Leythos said:On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:16:24 +0200, Alias wrote:
and this applies to ALL OS'S [sic].
--
Don't mean to be picky but plurals NEVER use an apostrophe.
Yea, but who's going to understand OSS![]()
Alias
Wasn't the OSS one of those bad groups to belong to in the 40s?
--
Snip[/QUOTE said:Just a quick look through the boards at www.pcbanter.net will touch on
current problems; (MS newsgroups)
My H. drive disappeared
I can't see my network.
My cd/dvd drives disappeared.
I can't access my USB devices.
Firewire devices not seen.
I can't access the internet; broadband & dial-up.
No DV camera capture; or camera not recognized.
Printing problems, scanner problems.
My question is why did all this hardware work with SP1, but not SP2?
Was it the spyware that worked with SP1, but won't work with SP2?
Was it the crappy native SP1 drivers for hardware that worked, that SP2
fixed?
How much information will the "average user," need to fix hardware that
wasn't broken before SP2?
Why were certain April 12th. updates allowed to break systems again?
It seems like the common thread is, if it ain't broke yet just wait;
we're working on it!
Jeez,
Treeman
FYI, don't try to discuss common sense about M$'s ethics and way of
doing business with an MVP. That's like trying to discuss wife abuse
with Henry the 8th.
You made one single mistake about M$ taking SP2 off the auto update
market and that is what the MVP capitalized on instead of what your
articulate message was really all about.
I haven't been here long and don't know the rules yet. However, I will
watch my step around here from now on. I thought I was giving a
constructive point of view in a courteous way but...... I guess what
you are saying is if I play in their backyard then don't say anything
negative about the Boss. Consider me as educated and put in my place.
Leythos said:On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:16:24 +0200, Alias wrote:
and this applies to ALL OS'S [sic].
--
Don't mean to be picky but plurals NEVER use an apostrophe.
Yea, but who's going to understand OSS
OSs. Or, you could spell it out: operating systems.
Alias
Wasn't the OSS one of those bad groups to belong to in the 40s?
--
The Office of Strategic Services was the precursor to the CIA.
Now, it's
http://www.oss.net/extra/tools/parser/index.cgi?url=/html/parse/index.html
or Open Source Solutions.
Go figure ...
I think, with only a few exceptions, that if you post a valid complaint
about a MS method or action that there are no negative responses to it, in
fact, many of the MVP's may agree with it - provided that it was valid.
In your case, to suggest that MS should do something that none of the
other OS vendors are doing, to criticize them for the failings of the OS
user (or the ignorance of the user), is not a valid complaint.
"didn't appear that it was going to be allowed to continue as a courteous
exchange"
If that is what you saw, perhaps what you saw was yourself.
"and will keep my mouth shut and stay in my place."
Really? Where is "my place"?
Also note who started and finished the insults in this
(e-mail address removed)
As for the rest, if you read the thread again, you may find the answers to
what you asked already posted.
Perhaps because none of the other vendors NEEDED to address some of his
points.
Example: Microsoft dealing with a billion dollar SP2 security fix to
deal with "vast numbers of compromised machines" as has been claimed
here by the MS MVP, preparing itself to be installed on... oh, I don't
know... compromised machines.
So, why wouldn't say Apple need to do the same? Well, according to the
media the word was that there was ONE Mac OS virus found in 2004 and
ZERO for the couple of years prior to that. I believe that was what the
count was that was published by several national sources a few months
ago. Got a count of the number of viruses that swept the MS world last
year?
That seems valid to me. But I expect you will shriek your refusal,
based on previous postings.
Or, to put this a different way, I guess if you dig yourself a hole, you
accept the consequences of what you chose to do.
Welcome to the
group and we appreciate you courtesy.