XP Home 5 user limit on shared network resource

G

Guest

I am trying to add a 6th PC to my 5 computer peer-to-peer office network all
running XP Home. We use two programs that require constant access to a shared
folder mapped with network drives to the main "server." I found that with XP
Home, only 5 computers can access the same network resource (in my case a
shared folder) at the same time. The Microsoft support documentation confirms
this limitation and says XP Pro can support 10 such concurrent users.

I figure that installing XP Pro on the main computer will solve this problem
and give up to 10 machines access to the same folder.

Am I right? Also, has anyone had problems with installing Pro on top of Home
SP2 as opposed to a clean install? (I know it's usually better to start
clean, but I'm looking at 4 or 5 hours to reinstall and configure everything).

Thanks for any expert help. JR
 
R

Ron Martell

JR said:
I am trying to add a 6th PC to my 5 computer peer-to-peer office network all
running XP Home. We use two programs that require constant access to a shared
folder mapped with network drives to the main "server." I found that with XP
Home, only 5 computers can access the same network resource (in my case a
shared folder) at the same time. The Microsoft support documentation confirms
this limitation and says XP Pro can support 10 such concurrent users.

I figure that installing XP Pro on the main computer will solve this problem
and give up to 10 machines access to the same folder.

Am I right? Also, has anyone had problems with installing Pro on top of Home
SP2 as opposed to a clean install? (I know it's usually better to start
clean, but I'm looking at 4 or 5 hours to reinstall and configure everything).

Thanks for any expert help. JR

If you upgrade the machine that hosts the shared folder to XP Pro then
you will be able to have up to 10 machines accessing that folder. The
machines doing the access can be running XP Home or pretty much any
other version of Windows (2000, Me, 98SE, 98) and it should all work.

Upgrades from XP Home to XP Pro are pretty much the simplest of any of
the possible Windows version upgrades as so many of the files are
identical between the two versions. All that is really being done is
to add some additional utilities and functionality. That being said,
Murphy's Law still applies and so you do need to be prepared to do a
clean install just in case things do go "bloooeey".

Good luck

Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
 
S

Saul

snipped


If you upgrade the machine that hosts the shared folder to XP Pro then
you will be able to have up to 10 machines accessing that folder. The
machines doing the access can be running XP Home or pretty much any
other version of Windows (2000, Me, 98SE, 98) and it should all work.
Good luck

Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada

Excuse me for jumping in here - but you might be able to answer a
question for me..

Is one way round this 10 user (XP Pro) limit to use LAN storage? Can
the version of Windows used control access to a LAN storage device the
way it controls access to shares?

Saul
 
K

Kerry Brown

Saul said:
Excuse me for jumping in here - but you might be able to answer a
question for me..

Is one way round this 10 user (XP Pro) limit to use LAN storage? Can
the version of Windows used control access to a LAN storage device the
way it controls access to shares?

Is this a stand alone network storage device or are you talking about a
share on a XP pro pc? A stand alone device that connects directly to the LAN
will have it's own OS. Any limits on connections will be imposed by that OS
and have nothing to do with XP. Most of them use imbedded Linux and have no
limitations. If you are talking about a share on a XP Pro pc then there is
no way around the limit.

Kerry
 
S

Saul

Is this a stand alone network storage device or are you talking about a
share on a XP pro pc? A stand alone device that connects directly to the LAN
will have it's own OS. Any limits on connections will be imposed by that OS
and have nothing to do with XP. Most of them use imbedded Linux and have no
limitations. If you are talking about a share on a XP Pro pc then there is
no way around the limit.

Kerry

Hi Kerry

This is a stand alone device being considered. I had hoped you would
support my theory that there would be no limitations!

I don't want to put in 2003 server just to share files to a handful of
PCs! I much prefer to plug a box into the router.

Many thanks

Saul
 
K

Kerry Brown

Saul said:
Hi Kerry

This is a stand alone device being considered. I had hoped you would
support my theory that there would be no limitations!

I don't want to put in 2003 server just to share files to a handful of
PCs! I much prefer to plug a box into the router.

Many thanks

Your best bet would be to contact the manufacturer of the device and ask
them.

Kerry
 
S

Saul

Your best bet would be to contact the manufacturer of the device and ask
them.

Kerry

Kerry,

We are going to borrow one of these devices and plug it into a network
which we will enlarge to twelve PCs..... I think it will work.

Thanks again

Saul
 
J

johnsmith

Excuse me for jumping in here - but you might be able to answer a
question for me..

Is one way round this 10 user (XP Pro) limit to use LAN storage? Can
the version of Windows used control access to a LAN storage device the
way it controls access to shares?

Saul

I have not used these but I suggest it would need to run Samba or some other flavour of Netbios in order to be seen by Windows Explorer.

If it runs Unix NFS then your windows boxes will need a proprietary (paid for) NFS client.

Either way you will avoid the Microsoft limit of 10 shares.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top