M
Mike
I replied to you because of the remark re. what good lateral thinking.. of
all the damage that could be done in a case, accidentally removing a jumper
would be the very last in the list..
Re. top posting.. I read through all of the posts in a thread so that I can
understand what has been said by all.. some of the bottom posting and where
people thread their replies into others are confusing at times.. scrolling
through a reply while making sense of it can be a nightmare.. if you were to
apply the rule that there should be no change from original rules/laws, man
would not have progressed the way he has..
And no.. I am not a newbie.. that you think that a jumper could have been
removed so easily might suggest that you are, however.. oh well
all the damage that could be done in a case, accidentally removing a jumper
would be the very last in the list..
Re. top posting.. I read through all of the posts in a thread so that I can
understand what has been said by all.. some of the bottom posting and where
people thread their replies into others are confusing at times.. scrolling
through a reply while making sense of it can be a nightmare.. if you were to
apply the rule that there should be no change from original rules/laws, man
would not have progressed the way he has..
And no.. I am not a newbie.. that you think that a jumper could have been
removed so easily might suggest that you are, however.. oh well