But the year is displayed...
Interesting thought, though. Suppose the programmer used day and month from the "real" dates and gets the year from an input
variable. And that together with different date systems......
I'd love to debug that one!
--
Kind regards,
Niek Otten
Microsoft MVP - Excel
| On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:19:43 -0500, "Gary Keramidas" <GKeramidasATmsn.com>
| wrote:
|
| >they run these reports separately, but one right after the other. this is what
| >they told me happened today
| >
| >Production Header-11/16/2006
| >
| >Stacking Sheets-11/17/2006
| >
| >Production Sheets-11/16/2006
| >
| >Run Sheet-11/17/2006
| >
| >Batching Sheet-11/17/2006
| >
| >GRDB2 Sheet-11/17/2006
|
| Gary,
|
| I'm not sure how you set up your code to display the date, but it is the case
| that if you switch from the 1900 to the 1904 date system, there is a 1462 day
| difference. That would lead to the day of the month differing by one -- as is
| occurring in some of those sheets.
|
| Is it possible that an inconsistency with regard to the date systems, along
| with either ignoring the year, or perhaps that gets processed differently so it
| looks OK, be the source of the problem?
|
|
| --ron