ray2386 said:
There must be many millions of Word97 documents that were created over the
past 8 years or so by people using the MS Word (*.doc) file extention.
Hard
to believe that all this stuff is to be trashed if one upgrades to Vista.
Hi Ray,
For what its worth, I have many Word 97 documents which I am able to open on
Vista using Word 2007 and Word Viewer 2003. Some of these documents contains
graphics as well.
So while you're undoubtedly seeing a genuine and frustrating problem, it's
not the universal experience of old Word documents on Vista.
Vista itself has no knowledge or understanding of Word documents - the Word
format is defined by an application, such as Word itself, Word Viewer, Open
Office, etc. Vista just sees a stream of bytes. So the question would be:
what application where you using to open these files, when you viewed them
on XP? And what application did you use on Vista?
BTW it sounds like although these are Word *.doc files, they mainly contain
scanned images of text, as embedded BMPs; rather than text itself - is that
correct? If so, it is a pretty unusual form of document - not in any way
"wrong", but it might explain why you're seeing this problem when many other
users do not.
BTW2 I suspect OpenOffice will be able to open the files successfully. If
you don't already have an Office-style application installed on this machine
and you need to manipulate document files, installing an application like
Office or OpenOffice would be a good step.
BTW3 Microsoft did pull something of an underhanded swifty in Vista, by
removing support for *.DOC files from WordPad. In Vista, WordPad can only
handle RTF and TXT files. But even on XP and earlier versions, WordPad was
not able to display and embedded graphics in *.DOC files; only the text
context.