JAD said:
sigh
if you are using standard VGA u are not using the adapters driver.
That was my point. You said that the video card was not compatible with
their monitor. That is false. If it were true you would not get a usable
image, even in safe mode. You could not even see the POST screens. You
said it was the adapter, and you are obviously wrong.
although
it is SEEN in safe mode, its size is jacked AND the color is degraded.
Because the settings in XP are the problem, not the adapter. You won't
get great views with that old monitor, but there is no hardware
incompatibility like you claimed.
I did
not say anything about a driver...I said the ADAPTERS lowest settings (using
the adapters driver).
That's true, you didn't say anything about a driver. You claimed a
hardware incompatibility where there was none, and now you're trying to
weasel out of it and are now making claims about the driver. Adding
those claims after the fact in parentheses when I'm the one who
mentioned what you were REALLY trying to say is a bit transparent.
Again you are NOT using the adapters driver when you
are at standard VGA in safe mode.
Exactly my point: the hardware incompatibility that you claimed does not
exist. You were wrong. The video adapter can provide settings that are
usable, if not, there would be no visible POST screen and no viewable
image in safe mode. Michael and I have both corrected you. I even gave
you a way out, seeing as you have this terrible inability to admit a
mistake of typing. Then you go and contradict yourself in the same
sentence, making you look like a blork.
--
spammage trappage: replace fishies_ with yahoo
I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/