ms said:
W98SE is for me very stable and reliable. Maybe 1-3 BSOD screens a
year, and since CCleaner does a good job of cleaning caches, maybe
even less. And this is with very few "critical MS security" patches
since 1997. Fred Langa says XP is a big advantage over W98 for
stability, but not what I see when I look on MS newsgroups.
And let us not forget the much maligned, DOS, that is present in
win 9x as a decent, single user, task sharing, 32-bit, console or
command line OS. Starting with win 2K no decent console available.
With dos and fat-32 and grinding one's teeth as one partitions
the disk a bit -- one has a large and good set of recovery tools
available, free, should all or part of windows fail. After 9x,
not so.
Most of the useful, from a user's view, aspects of the unix
command line have been ported to dos by GNU along with a host
of other free dos utilities, and versions of dos.
It will be hard for linus programs to keep pace with the
variety of userful freeware programs for windows, due to
the mass of the latter.
The cycle of changing formats and versions for windows will
be endless, for profit reasons. Perhaps - ah but a dream,
the set of useful functions home users want for a computer
will stabalize (e.g., a word processor, a spreadsheet, etc.),
and they will stop caring about the infinite supply of eye
candy being manufactured each years.
At that point. linus could reliably supply such a set, although
unix was originally build for larger computers, and multi-users,
and programmers -- and will carry a lots of unnecessary extra
weight in that regard for a long time to come.