Why reply at the bottom of posts?

[WhoDat]

Humm, let's analyze Plato's opinion...the subject line says "Why reply at
the bottom of posts? Ok, now we all know the question, so without scrolling
or wasting energy in any other manner, voila, now you can read these lines
of wit because I 'top posted'. This is obviously the best way...but I love
this subject every time it comes up, and it has over ??? times [guess how
many times, or follow link to see fo yo self]:

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_...81&as_maxd=17&as_maxm=8&as_maxy=2005&safe=off





| Because lots of people like to read the question first and then the
| answer

 

[kurttrail]

Humm, let's analyze Plato's opinion...the subject line says "Why
reply at the bottom of posts? Ok, now we all know the question, so
without scrolling or wasting energy in any other manner, voila, now
you can read these lines of wit because I 'top posted'.

LOL! We knew the question from the subject line, but know nothing of
the actual post you were replying to, so they would have to scroll down
to read Plato's post, and then scroll back up to read your reply which
didn't make much sense in reply to his post.

So you may think it is easier and wastes less time, and you may be right
for you reading your own reply, but scrolling down then up again wasn't
easier for me, who read Plato's post yesterday, and need to refresh my
memory.

This is
obviously the best way...but I love this subject every time it comes
up, and it has over ??? times [guess how many times, or follow link
to see fo yo self]:

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_...81&as_maxd=17&as_maxm=8&as_maxy=2005&safe=off

Who really cares? God does!

And God told me that inline posting is schizit! Top and Bottom posters
are all going to hell for spreading their heresy! ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"