Which is the best

  • Thread starter Thread starter Denny
  • Start date Start date
D

Denny

I know this is going to be by opinion and personal experience, but which
brand of Wireless Router/Switch is the best? Thanks in advance! I am
talking about a price range under $100. Is it worth it to purchase the
Wireless G or is the Wireless B sufficient?
 
I know this is going to be by opinion and personal experience, but which
brand of Wireless Router/Switch is the best? Thanks in advance! I am
talking about a price range under $100. Is it worth it to purchase the
Wireless G or is the Wireless B sufficient?

Denny,

This topic is found constantly in alt.internet.wireless and
microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless.

Both brand preference, and wireless mode, are so much a matter of personal need.
But the discussions in those forums will give you plenty of thought.

Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
 
I have been installing network equipment (consumer and commercial) for
years. Most of that time I was dedicated to Linksys for home use. One day
I tried a brand called Buffalo. I have not bought or installed anything
else since then. Bar none, Buffalo is the best on the market.

Bobby
 
Thanks Chuck!
Chuck said:
Denny,

This topic is found constantly in alt.internet.wireless and
microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless.

Both brand preference, and wireless mode, are so much a matter of personal
need.
But the discussions in those forums will give you plenty of thought.

Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
 
Thanks for the information Bobby!
NoNoBadDog! said:
I have been installing network equipment (consumer and commercial) for
years. Most of that time I was dedicated to Linksys for home use. One day
I tried a brand called Buffalo. I have not bought or installed anything
else since then. Bar none, Buffalo is the best on the market.

Bobby
 
NoNoBadDog! said:
I have been installing network equipment (consumer and commercial) for
years. Most of that time I was dedicated to Linksys for home use. One day
I tried a brand called Buffalo. I have not bought or installed anything
else since then. Bar none, Buffalo is the best on the market.

Bobby

What are the logging capabilities of Buffalo routers, so you can see
what attacks you're being protected from?

Do Buffalo routers have a real-time log? Are they LinkLogger compatible?
<http://www.linklogger.com/product_info.htm>

Are they IPTables compatible? Do they support SNMPTrap (port 162) or
SysLog (port 514)?
<http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#Routers>
 
I have been installing network equipment (consumer and commercial) for
years. Most of that time I was dedicated to Linksys for home use. One day
I tried a brand called Buffalo. I have not bought or installed anything
else since then. Bar none, Buffalo is the best on the market.

Bobby

Bobby,

Do Buffalo routers have a web page? I've searched before (Google and Yahoo) and
all I find are resellers (bizrate.com, routers.com, shopping.com) and reviewers
(pcmag.com, zdnet.com).

Not <http://www.buffalo.com/> either. DOHH!

Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
 
Chuck;

The URL is www.buffalotech.com
They make memory (firestix is among the best available),
storage products, networking equipment, etc.

Be sure to read about AOSS. It really does work.


Bobby
 
Lou Ramsey said:
NoNoBadDog! wrote:

What are the logging capabilities of Buffalo routers, so you can see
what attacks you're being protected from?

Do Buffalo routers have a real-time log? Are they LinkLogger compatible?
<http://www.linklogger.com/product_info.htm>

Are they IPTables compatible? Do they support SNMPTrap (port 162) or
SysLog (port 514)?
<http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#Routers>

The September 1, 2004 release of WallWatcher will contain support for
the Buffalo WBR-54G. That router uses the SysLog (514) port for
logging. Based on the sample data I've been given, that router reports
blocked traffic and status messages, but does not report normal
Outbound traffic that was allowed to reach the Internet.

Someone is also using a Buffalo Access Point with WallWatcher. The
Access point does not report Traffic at all, just connection status.

If your Buffalo router uses a different logging format than the
WBR-54G, you can download the "Log Capture" tool from
www.wallwatcher.com to collect some samples, then send them to me
(instructions included in the download).
 
On 28 Aug 2004 10:28:14 -0700, (e-mail address removed) (Dan Tseng -
WallWatcher author) wrote:

The September 1, 2004 release of WallWatcher will contain support for
the Buffalo WBR-54G. That router uses the SysLog (514) port for
logging. Based on the sample data I've been given, that router reports
blocked traffic and status messages, but does not report normal
Outbound traffic that was allowed to reach the Internet.

Someone is also using a Buffalo Access Point with WallWatcher. The
Access point does not report Traffic at all, just connection status.

If your Buffalo router uses a different logging format than the
WBR-54G, you can download the "Log Capture" tool from
www.wallwatcher.com to collect some samples, then send them to me
(instructions included in the download).

Tnak you, Dan.

Obviously, WallWatcher is headed towards being a paid product, and rightfully
so. It's ahead of the competition IMHO.

Based upon your analysis, I don't think I'd recommend Buffalo routers to anyone
concerned with outgoing security. Unless also protected by a personal firewall,
anyway.

Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
 
The Buffalo router is still the best performing router I have used. I
always use a third party firewall (Norton Personal Firewall). In your case,
I understand your reservations. But most people are not fixated on that
aspect, and want performance, which is what the Buffalo delivers. There are
no perfect answers out there. While you may prefer a router that will allow
you to monitor every bit of traffic (pun intended), I can assure you that
most would still buy a router that performs well.

Bobby
 
The Buffalo router is still the best performing router I have used. I
always use a third party firewall (Norton Personal Firewall). In your case,
I understand your reservations. But most people are not fixated on that
aspect, and want performance, which is what the Buffalo delivers. There are
no perfect answers out there. While you may prefer a router that will allow
you to monitor every bit of traffic (pun intended), I can assure you that
most would still buy a router that performs well.

Bobby

Good point, Bobby.

BR only seem to sell wireless products. I don't think the wired network is dead
yet. What's up with that?

BTW, Denny, I told you "Both brand preference, and wireless mode, are so much a
matter of personal need." I hope you've gotten an eyeful. The
Comp.security.firewalls forum would certainly give you one. %-}

Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
 
They do sell wired products as well. I know that in the US market, they are
concentrating on the wireless market, but they do offer wired solutions.
Perhaps an email to their support (which is excellent AND in the US) will
get more info for you.

Bobby
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top