Vista @ssholes

  • Thread starter Thread starter clintonG
  • Start date Start date
"clintonG" whined, again...
// this video is for all of you who have been so "helpful"

And I'm still trying to learn how many websites Vista will support on a
single machine being used for web development.

<%= Clinton Gallagher
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/
Click to expand...

Maybe a little more information? I.E., how many websites will XP support on
a single machine being used for web development? Are you trying to set up a
web server? Vista is an Operating System, not a Web Design Program. Your
question has to make sense in the context.
 
You've asked several times and not received an answer that satisfies you.
Have you thought that maybe no one here knows the answer? This is a peer to
peer support newsgroup. Maybe you could try setting this up as an experiment
and contribute the knowledge learned back to this newsgroup so the next
person asking this question will get an answer.
 
Here's the long and short of it.

I had an MSDN subscrition I could not afford to keep but for that period of
time I had the opportunity to use Windows Server 2003 as my web development
platform. I could not afford to continue doing so because backup and virus
management and related tools are many hundreds of dollars each so I was
compelled to downsize to XP Pro.

As you know XP will only support one website located at Inetpub/wwwroot. If
you've done any web development you know this is a real problem when writing
code for a website that will then be deployed to a hosting service provider
which supports Windows Server 2003 (or earlier for this matter).

So the point is web designers and developers need more than one website on
their machines. Like up to 5 would be ideal I think for most of us.

Vista supports IIS7 which is very exciting to know but again, how many
websites will Vista allow to be run when using IIS7 on a single machine? Its
not IIS7 that will impose the limit it will be the OS. Nobody is going to
run a hosting business on a Vista machine that will only run a limited
number of websites but website designers and developers need support for
more than one website on a machine running Vista. So how many?

Clear as mud?

<%= Clinton
 
"clintonG" finally explained...
Here's the long and short of it.

I had an MSDN subscrition I could not afford to keep but for that period
of time I had the opportunity to use Windows Server 2003 as my web
development platform. I could not afford to continue doing so because
backup and virus management and related tools are many hundreds of dollars
each so I was compelled to downsize to XP Pro.

As you know XP will only support one website located at Inetpub/wwwroot.
If you've done any web development you know this is a real problem when
writing code for a website that will then be deployed to a hosting service
provider which supports Windows Server 2003 (or earlier for this matter).

So the point is web designers and developers need more than one website on
their machines. Like up to 5 would be ideal I think for most of us.

Vista supports IIS7 which is very exciting to know but again, how many
websites will Vista allow to be run when using IIS7 on a single machine?
Its not IIS7 that will impose the limit it will be the OS. Nobody is going
to run a hosting business on a Vista machine that will only run a limited
number of websites but website designers and developers need support for
more than one website on a machine running Vista. So how many?

Clear as mud?
Click to expand...


Yes, much better. I'll do some checking and get back to you. Thanks!
 
clintonG said:
// this video is for all of you who have been so "helpful"

And I'm still trying to learn how many websites Vista will support on a
single machine being used for web development.

<%= Clinton Gallagher
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/
Click to expand...

Where's Frank? He claims to know *everything* about Windows. Frank? Can
you help this person or can you only lie about and insult people? Here's
your chance to show everyone that you're not a troll and can actually
help someone.
 
clintonG said:
Here's the long and short of it.

I had an MSDN subscrition I could not afford to keep but for that period
of time I had the opportunity to use Windows Server 2003 as my web
development platform. I could not afford to continue doing so because
backup and virus management and related tools are many hundreds of dollars
each so I was compelled to downsize to XP Pro.

As you know XP will only support one website located at Inetpub/wwwroot.
If you've done any web development you know this is a real problem when
writing code for a website that will then be deployed to a hosting service
provider which supports Windows Server 2003 (or earlier for this matter).

So the point is web designers and developers need more than one website on
their machines. Like up to 5 would be ideal I think for most of us.

Vista supports IIS7 which is very exciting to know but again, how many
websites will Vista allow to be run when using IIS7 on a single machine?
Its not IIS7 that will impose the limit it will be the OS. Nobody is going
to run a hosting business on a Vista machine that will only run a limited
number of websites but website designers and developers need support for
more than one website on a machine running Vista. So how many?

Clear as mud?
Click to expand...

Man, that would be any Web Server that's not already on the machine like
Apache not IIS, that is not in conflict on TCP port 80 HTTP with another Web
server already running.

You stop the Web server that's using IIS so that HTTP TCP port 80 is
released, and then you can use something like Apache that would be using
HTTP tcp 80, because they are two different Web servers with different
components..

Man, two or more Web servers can't be running on the machine at the same
time using tcp port 80. If one Web server is already active on the machine
using HTTP tcp port 80, then a second Web Server has to be configured to use
a tcp port other than tcp 80 for HTTP.

Man, you can run as many as you want as long as they all using a different
tcp ports for HTTP, and not the same version of a Web server, like two
IIS(s) or Apache(s) no matter what versions they, because of like
components, already existing on the machine.

IIS is IIS. So what makes you think that IIS7 would be so much different
than any of its previous processors in basic functionality?
 
And how helpful have you been?
How considerate have you been?
You get answers and seem to ignore them or just assume you are being
ignored.
Perhaps you should try and see what you are able to do.

This is a peer to peer support newsgroup.
This means there are people like you and me asking and answering
questions.
No one has to answer anything from anyone, anything posted is
voluntary at the posters time and expense.
Anything else you assume is probably wrong.

I suggest you go back and read your other replies particular lily
those referring to other sources of information.
Then, if necessary, post again.
But this time use another name since some have already blocked you
because you constant bashing.
 
Alias said:
Where's Frank? He claims to know *everything* about Windows. Frank? Can
you help this person or can you only lie about and insult people? Here's
your chance to show everyone that you're not a troll and can actually help
someone.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't you be peddling Ubuntu in Iran or Iraq? If you went to Iraq, you
could just walk down the street talking to street vendors.
 
Mr. Arnold said:
Man, that would be any Web Server that's not already on the machine like
Apache not IIS, that is not in conflict on TCP port 80 HTTP with another
Web server already running.

You stop the Web server that's using IIS so that HTTP TCP port 80 is
released, and then you can use something like Apache that would be using
HTTP tcp 80, because they are two different Web servers with different
components..

Man, two or more Web servers can't be running on the machine at the same
time using tcp port 80. If one Web server is already active on the machine
using HTTP tcp port 80, then a second Web Server has to be configured to
use a tcp port other than tcp 80 for HTTP.

Man, you can run as many as you want as long as they all using a
different tcp ports for HTTP, and not the same version of a Web server,
like two IIS(s) or Apache(s) no matter what versions they, because of
like components, already existing on the machine.

IIS is IIS. So what makes you think that IIS7 would be so much different
than any of its previous processors in basic functionality?
Click to expand...

I think you are confusing how many web "servers" with how many "websites" a
given instance of a web server will serve?

I have Apache and IIS running side-by-side on my XP Pro machine. I use
Apache to learn RoR. After twenty years of supporting this vendor I am
nearing my patience with the lies and deception from Microsoft that hurts
the little guy like me. So I'm hedging my bets in that regard and the
question is not how many web servers will run.

The question is how many websites does Vista support. Not to be insulting
but if you were an experienced web developer you would already understand
the question.

<%= Clinton
 
you ask for frank and bill yanair pops up...


they are in love!!!


2 dipsh*ts that think (er.. or not) alike!
 
Speaking of Dipsh*its, here comes the brain dead Mike Glenn. What a loser.

Go play in the street
 
Bill said:
Shouldn't you be peddling Ubuntu in Iran or Iraq? If you went to Iraq, you
could just walk down the street talking to street vendors.
Click to expand...
hehehe...good one! :-)
Frank
 
Mike said:
you ask for frank and bill yanair pops up...


they are in love!!!


2 dipsh*ts that think (er.. or not) alike!
Click to expand...
Bill replies and you pop up?
What's that all about?
You're jealous right?
Frank
 
clintonG said:
Here's the long and short of it.

I had an MSDN subscrition I could not afford to keep but for that period
of time I had the opportunity to use Windows Server 2003 as my web
development platform. I could not afford to continue doing so because
backup and virus management and related tools are many hundreds of dollars
each so I was compelled to downsize to XP Pro.

As you know XP will only support one website located at Inetpub/wwwroot.
If you've done any web development you know this is a real problem when
writing code for a website that will then be deployed to a hosting service
provider which supports Windows Server 2003 (or earlier for this matter).

So the point is web designers and developers need more than one website on
their machines. Like up to 5 would be ideal I think for most of us.

Vista supports IIS7 which is very exciting to know but again, how many
websites will Vista allow to be run when using IIS7 on a single machine?
Its not IIS7 that will impose the limit it will be the OS. Nobody is going
to run a hosting business on a Vista machine that will only run a limited
number of websites but website designers and developers need support for
more than one website on a machine running Vista. So how many?

Clear as mud?

<%= Clinton
Click to expand...

Then move on up to what the professionals use and install LAMP. You do want
to be a professional web developer, don't you?

Cheers.
 
clintonG said:
I think you are confusing how many web "servers" with how many "websites"
a given instance of a web server will serve?
Click to expand...

A Web site runs on a Web server so what does Vista have to do with this?
I have Apache and IIS running side-by-side on my XP Pro machine. I use
Apache to learn RoR. After twenty years of supporting this vendor I am
nearing my patience with the lies and deception from Microsoft that hurts
the little guy like me. So I'm hedging my bets in that regard and the
question is not how many web servers will run.
Click to expand...

How many Web sites does XP support? What does the O/S have to do with how
many Web sites a Web server will support.
The question is how many websites does Vista support. Not to be insulting
but if you were an experienced web developer you would already understand
the question.
Click to expand...

You got IIS7 running on the machine you would see it, and no one would have
to tell you, if you were all that, no insult.

BTW, I have been programming since 1980, and I have been doing Web
development off and on since 2000. I have been doing .Net Web development
since 2004. I got phone calls for me to take possible Web devilment
contracts from the East to West coast and to the North and South boarders of
the US.

As I matter of fact, I have a phone interview today at 3:30 pm EST for
contract up in northern OH for a major insurance company. I got another one
lined up on Wednesday, and have three more interviews for .Net contracts
coming up soon, so partner I more that have the expertise.

I am not a Web server Admin, but I know my s*it about Web and workstation
business application development on the MS platform. I work for the big boys
the billion dolar companies contracting with Web server farms with a state
server, and not something happening at the workstation . :)

I have to go. I got to get ready for this phone interview.

Here keep looking for the number, use Google. :)

<copied>

There are a couple of additional IIS7 features that I feel warrant
mentioning. First, the ASP.NET Tracing features can now be integrated with
the IIS logging features to provide a single, consolidated place to go for
diagnostic information, reducing the time it takes to troubleshoot server
issues. Second, the version of IIS7 that comes with Windows Vista will now
allow multiple Web sites to be configured at the same time. This is a big
improvement over the single Web site limitation of IIS 5.1 that sits on
Windows XP Professional. Not only that, but while there is still a limit of
10 concurrent connections on the version of IIS7 that comes with Windows
Vista, the overage will not be denied. Rather, they will be placed on the
request queue and processed in order.

<copied>
 
 
I think he gets "Moist" when Bill Yanair is around. Dunno what ol Mikey is
into, but I don't want to go there :-)
 
Spanky deMonkey said:
I think he gets "Moist" when Bill Yanair is around. Dunno what ol Mikey is
into, but I don't want to go there :-)
Click to expand...
I think Mike is a Vista-phobe! Don't bend over and pick up the soap when
Mike is around. Just FYI.
 
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:59:23 -0400, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.
BTW, I have been programming since 1980, and I have been doing Web
development off and on since 2000. I have been doing .Net Web development
since 2004. I got phone calls for me to take possible Web devilment
contracts from the East to West coast and to the North and South boarders of
the US.
Click to expand...

Another wannabe that's really just a braggart. You related to this
Arnold? The famous Arnold the pig from Green Acres, still a staple of
TVland.

http://www.arnoldziffel.com/arnold8.jpg

He liked to be known as just Arnold, if you want to be formal Arnold
Ziffle, but never mister. This Arnold is WAY smarter than newsgroup
clown Frank. Oh wait, maybe you're related to another mister. That
would be Mister Ed.

http://www.larrytt.com/celebrities_playing_tt/mister_ed.jpg

But to be honest I'll wager most people reading your tripe view you as
this: http://users.adelphia.net/~aattoun/Horse_Ass.jpg
As I matter of fact, I have a phone interview today at 3:30 pm EST for
contract up in northern OH for a major insurance company. I got another one
lined up on Wednesday, and have three more interviews for .Net contracts
coming up soon, so partner I more that have the expertise.
Click to expand...

Who gives a crap? You are just a B L O W H A R D
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Web development on Vista? 1
How Many Websites Are Supported? 1
RSS Support? 3
Will Upgrading Premium to Business Retain Premium's Features? 8
Web Development on Vista? 6
OnClientClick syntax? 1
New stuff in C# 3.0? 1
Good Article About the Rebranding of FrontPage 1

Back
Top