Jupiter said:
"Depends on your definition of Beta."
False.
You nor I determine when a product is Beta, the manufacturer makes
that determination.
That's true, provided the manufacturer has standards.
Vista isn't even a beta, I've worked with LongHorn
beta's since just after the alpha stages, they were
smaller, quicker, and had little problems outside
of a few memory leaks and file system..MS took out
the file system and called the memory leak a feature.
Vista fresh install works fine, the Vista upgrade is
an insult to Microsofts integrity and skill, it will
automatically (without any prompt) roll back at the
very end of installation simply for a missing video
driver (maybe for sound also)..2 hours wasted.
Oddly..the fresh install places the generic video
driver into use and bypasses sound setup..yet the
upgrade can't make that decision and the actual
files for video card are in Vista *.inf <duh>,
I actually ended up manually installing the same
video drivers the XP edition were using and that
was for a vista ready certified card. I've used,
installed, corrected some hundred or more MS
beta's over the past decade and this installer
would never have been an acceptable beta (although
beta OS is always a fresh install recommendation).
That is your opinion and some can say the same for virtually all
software from any source.
Yes one can, but that's not why people use or buy
Microsoft products..a product that typically sets
the bar for performance and user friendly operation.
Vista does have all the goodies but is assembled
in such a manner I can't believe it's from MS,
it's more like a first time retail attempt from
a startup company...one that won't even survive.
The fact is Windows Vista is not Beta.
Correct, beta products move forwards not backwards.
Those who feel otherwise are free to choose any of the many other
options available.
And those that do, probably should.
Heh, sort of like we got your money over the years and
we control your food supply ... so eat dirt or die.
Jupiter, you've already posted a hundred times more
effort than it would actually take in mouse clicks
for MS to clean up and repair some trivial errors
hardcoded into Vista, lowering your standards to
fit a lazy slowpoke MS regime and product is not
going to do the future any good, defend yourself.
NT Canuck
'Seek and ye shall find'