A
Alias
Lang said:And you don't think there's -any- chance that any of these IP's are
spoofed?
Even if they're not... at some point one must choose to either let the
government attempt to prevent future in-country attacks or take one's
chances. I am, by all accounts, fairly liberal in my thinking. That
said, I would prefer the former choice and having to give up my on-line
privacy ( -I- have nothing to hide, at least as it relates to terrorist
activities) if it helped prevent the detonation of a dirty bomb in Times
Square. I don't think the feds are concerned with other aspects of one's
private life. (Unless one is a drug dealer of major proportion or some
other high-level criminal.)
I used to live in Yonkers, NY. I could sit in my driveway and see the
World Trade Center towers. When I lived on LI, on a clear day, one could
see the tops of the towers from forty miles away. No more. The
approximate three thousand people that died on 9/11/01 will pale in
comparison if the bad guys manage to get a dirty bomb into NYC and
detonate it. Read my email, please!
And all that said... if one accepts (or, in many folks cases, submits
to) government agencies sucking up local bandwidth to monitor for
terrorist traffic, then one must accept that such activities are going
to have a negative effect on performance. It's a fact of life. Sure, the
negative effect on performance sucks big time... the alternative, i.e.,
letting everyone post in total anonymity, well.. personally, as the
previous statements in this email suggest, is a freedom I'm willing to
sacrifice -these days-. But, again, that may be because I lived up in
the NYC area, lived in Manhattan for 12 years, in fact. And I believe
that NYC will remain the main target. But I'm getting off track, now...
sorry. Yes, having big brother suck up your local bandwidth sucks! I'm
willing to deal with it.
Lang
Considering that it's likely that Bush and Cheney had a lot to do with
9/11, this spying is even more scary.
Alias