D
Dek
Vista is like an arrogant big brother, while XP is more like a best friend.
What I'm alluding to is the fact that Vista arrogantly forces you to use the
OS it's way. Vista thinks that it alone knows best and restricts the changes
you can make. XP on the other hand allows you to set up the OS just how you
like it.
Examples:
XP: In the "My Documents" folder I have many custom folders besides the
preset MS ones and I'm able to change the file location of the entire "My
Documents" so that it points to a separate hard drive.
VISTA: In the "Documents" folder Vista only allows me to change the file
location of the individual preset MS folders such as "Music". My thirty-five
custom folders, some of which are very large, are forced to reside on the C
drive. I don't want bury my folders away in Vista's neato preset folders.
Vista won't let me do things my way so it doesn't feel like a friendly OS
the way XP does. Vista annoys the way big brothers do!
I have a similar issue with IE6 vs. IE7. IE6 allows me to squeeze the
settings I want into as few tool bars as possible leaving more space for the
web page. IE7 like Vista arrogantly forces me to use the app it's way only.
I like to use things like the "Links" folder which must have a whole toolbar
row to it's self under IE7. I'm left with two inches of tool bars for little
additional functionality.
IE7 should have offered additional flexibility not less. For example: more
people have widescreen monitors, IE7 should have allowed the toolbars to run
down the side of the window if the user so wished.
I assume that less flexibility also means less chance that less advanced
used will screw their system up. My fear is that future generations of
Windows and other MS apps will become more and more prescriptive and less
and less flexible to power users.
How about the option to run the next Windows OS and IE8 in either default
mode or advanced mode with the ability to easily switch between the two.
Many apps such as Nero already do this. Perhaps it's time for MS to realise
that one size no longer fits all.
Two modes of operation would allow the Windows OS to be more fully developed
for the two types of user. Users who want the OS to be as simple and easy to
use as possible and power users who would make good use of more flexible
settings.
If you read this far, thanks. Comments welcome.
Derek B
What I'm alluding to is the fact that Vista arrogantly forces you to use the
OS it's way. Vista thinks that it alone knows best and restricts the changes
you can make. XP on the other hand allows you to set up the OS just how you
like it.
Examples:
XP: In the "My Documents" folder I have many custom folders besides the
preset MS ones and I'm able to change the file location of the entire "My
Documents" so that it points to a separate hard drive.
VISTA: In the "Documents" folder Vista only allows me to change the file
location of the individual preset MS folders such as "Music". My thirty-five
custom folders, some of which are very large, are forced to reside on the C
drive. I don't want bury my folders away in Vista's neato preset folders.
Vista won't let me do things my way so it doesn't feel like a friendly OS
the way XP does. Vista annoys the way big brothers do!
I have a similar issue with IE6 vs. IE7. IE6 allows me to squeeze the
settings I want into as few tool bars as possible leaving more space for the
web page. IE7 like Vista arrogantly forces me to use the app it's way only.
I like to use things like the "Links" folder which must have a whole toolbar
row to it's self under IE7. I'm left with two inches of tool bars for little
additional functionality.
IE7 should have offered additional flexibility not less. For example: more
people have widescreen monitors, IE7 should have allowed the toolbars to run
down the side of the window if the user so wished.
I assume that less flexibility also means less chance that less advanced
used will screw their system up. My fear is that future generations of
Windows and other MS apps will become more and more prescriptive and less
and less flexible to power users.
How about the option to run the next Windows OS and IE8 in either default
mode or advanced mode with the ability to easily switch between the two.
Many apps such as Nero already do this. Perhaps it's time for MS to realise
that one size no longer fits all.
Two modes of operation would allow the Windows OS to be more fully developed
for the two types of user. Users who want the OS to be as simple and easy to
use as possible and power users who would make good use of more flexible
settings.
If you read this far, thanks. Comments welcome.
Derek B