User selectable DNSBL sources for Outlook Junk Mail Filter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

The Outlook Junk Email Filter should have user selectable DNSBL sources, such
as the option to use the Spamhaus SBL and XBL lists. This would greatly
assist in the reduction of SPAM from known sources and "spam gangs" that send
most spam.
 
Microsoft desinged the filter to work out of the box and be 100% free of user
configuration because testing shows users either waste too much time creating
spam filters or never do. They've been released updates monthly so that users
don't need to do anything but visit office update occassionally.

As for RBLs, they suck. Users are at the mercy of vigilate RBL owners and
many times they block entire netblocks "just because" they want to - not
because the IPs actually send spam.
 
Interesting ...

You tend to indicate that the users are stupid (and some are - but not
most), and you tend to indicate that operators of RBL's are stupid (and most
are - but some are not). SpamCop is a "vigilante" type outfit, responding to
"snitches", but please educate yourself on Spamhaus - which is used by
government (including USA) and by police agencies (including USA) and
business, and particularly see their XBL listing. Not all users of Outlook
are uneducated - is that your view of Microsoft users? You seem to have a
very strange attitude toward suggestions to make things better than they are.
Is this the general attitude of "MVP's", that Microsoft knows best - if they
haven't already done it, then it isn't worth doing? How USA of you.
 
I agree with "your buddy". In addition to those comments, be aware that
Microsoft (and company) is among the biggest spammers. What...you haven't
figured that out, yet? Now, if they would straighten up and fly right AND
stop treating us like brainless twits or leaning on that ever popular "I am
in control and I am always right; therefore, I will tell you what you need,
what you can have, and you what can and cannot do; and you must pay to keep
me in control" attitude. It's not USA of him... it's just Microsoft's
Messiah Complex showing again.
 
Not an Outlook problem as RBLs and other blacklists operators operate at the
server level, not Outlook.

Trolling fun this weekend, eh?


--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading.

After furious head scratching, c7sparks asked:

| I agree with "your buddy". In addition to those comments, be aware
| that Microsoft (and company) is among the biggest spammers.
| What...you haven't figured that out, yet? Now, if they would
| straighten up and fly right AND stop treating us like brainless twits
| or leaning on that ever popular "I am in control and I am always
| right; therefore, I will tell you what you need, what you can have,
| and you what can and cannot do; and you must pay to keep me in
| control" attitude. It's not USA of him... it's just Microsoft's
| Messiah Complex showing again.
|
| "yourbuddy" wrote:
|
|| Interesting ...
||
|| You tend to indicate that the users are stupid (and some are - but
|| not most), and you tend to indicate that operators of RBL's are
|| stupid (and most are - but some are not). SpamCop is a "vigilante"
|| type outfit, responding to "snitches", but please educate yourself
|| on Spamhaus - which is used by government (including USA) and by
|| police agencies (including USA) and business, and particularly see
|| their XBL listing. Not all users of Outlook are uneducated - is that
|| your view of Microsoft users? You seem to have a very strange
|| attitude toward suggestions to make things better than they are. Is
|| this the general attitude of "MVP's", that Microsoft knows best - if
|| they haven't already done it, then it isn't worth doing? How USA of
|| you.
||
|| "Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote:
||
||| Microsoft desinged the filter to work out of the box and be 100%
||| free of user configuration because testing shows users either waste
||| too much time creating spam filters or never do. They've been
||| released updates monthly so that users don't need to do anything
||| but visit office update occassionally.
|||
||| As for RBLs, they suck. Users are at the mercy of vigilate RBL
||| owners and many times they block entire netblocks "just because"
||| they want to - not because the IPs actually send spam.
|||
||| "yourbuddy" wrote:
|||
|||| The Outlook Junk Email Filter should have user selectable DNSBL
|||| sources, such as the option to use the Spamhaus SBL and XBL lists.
|||| This would greatly assist in the reduction of SPAM from known
|||| sources and "spam gangs" that send most spam.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top