L
Lynne Eske
Hello,
The company where I work is upgrading from 97 to 2003
Today I was asked to install 2003 on my PC
In the email about how to do the install and convert the database I was
advised that if the database used local tables then the database should be
split.
I followed the instructions but ...........
Firstly, why should I split the database ?
The database has about 30 tables with one of them having about 9000 records.
Secondly, the database was 'secure' before I split it and after the split
there appeared another database just with the tables in.
However, I can access this database without any security whatsoever.
The original database is still secure and it shows the linked tables but how
do I secure the new database ?
Am I right in saying that I now have two databases, a front end and a back
end ?
If so what is the advantage as all it's done is make my data unsecure
Thanks
Lynne
The company where I work is upgrading from 97 to 2003
Today I was asked to install 2003 on my PC
In the email about how to do the install and convert the database I was
advised that if the database used local tables then the database should be
split.
I followed the instructions but ...........
Firstly, why should I split the database ?
The database has about 30 tables with one of them having about 9000 records.
Secondly, the database was 'secure' before I split it and after the split
there appeared another database just with the tables in.
However, I can access this database without any security whatsoever.
The original database is still secure and it shows the linked tables but how
do I secure the new database ?
Am I right in saying that I now have two databases, a front end and a back
end ?
If so what is the advantage as all it's done is make my data unsecure
Thanks
Lynne