Ubuntu - Read the review - Ubuntu Sucks

[GO]

So Ubuntu has a habit of improving drastically every 6 months. =)

Yup. Ubuntu's made some great strides in the last few releases. I actually
love the "enchanced effects" they have. They're a ton more useful than
anything MS added to the Aero interface. Aero's pretty and all but it
certainly doesn't add anything useful.

 

[Terry R.]

GO wrote:


I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you know
of my postings.
Who cares?
I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
Frank

No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way I could
have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal of threads so far
and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none* of which were helpful. So
statistically speaking, this leads me to believe that the rest of your posts
are equally as useful. Perhaps you do help the odd person but the odds are
stacked as you being as useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
[/QUOTE]

You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
businessman:

Search for <OCRG#[email protected]> in Google Groups.

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

 

[GO]

No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way
I could have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal
of threads so far and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none*
of which were helpful. So statistically speaking, this leads me to
believe that the rest of your posts are equally as useful. Perhaps
you do help the odd person but the odds are stacked as you being as
useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.

You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
businessman:
[/QUOTE]

Yup. I was tempted to do as you say or even perform a search, but I have
better things to do with my time. But I think I've seen enough already to
make a valid opinion. Why I even bothered replying to him is beyond me. I
guess I just have too much (unplaced) faith in humanity.

 

[Terry R.]

On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard

You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
businessman:

Yup. I was tempted to do as you say or even perform a search, but I have
better things to do with my time. But I think I've seen enough already to
make a valid opinion. Why I even bothered replying to him is beyond me. I
guess I just have too much (unplaced) faith in humanity.
[/QUOTE]

I feel the same. Don't let it stifle your faith.

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.