Top Windows Registry Repairer Software Review

[voujnbwuotkd]

I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you install
a new software application or program to your computer, windows will
add the information to its registry. The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your computer
as well as the associated configurations. The more programs you add
the larger the registry becomes, thus making your computer slower and
possibly more problematic as time progresses. So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.
You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use of
a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....

Registry Repair: http://groups.google.com/group/regrepairsbv

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

I am sure most people are aware of the fact that whenever you install
a new software application or program to your computer, windows will
add the information to its registry.

Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.

The registry contains important
information about the hardware and software installed in your computer
as well as the associated configurations. The more programs you add
the larger the registry becomes,

Generally true, as above.

thus making your computer slower and

Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.

possibly more problematic as time progresses.

Also false.

So how do you take care
of registry problems? You simply use a registry cleaner which will do
all of the hard work for you. It will automatically repair any
problems and help you get rid of unnecessary data.

Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

You need to understand that having a damaged registry can ultimately
result in corruption of you entire operating system, which can then
sometimes become totally unusable. This is why you need to make use of
a good quality registry cleaner which can perform regular system
checks to make sure that any potential problems are repaired....

Completely false, as above.

 

[John John (MVP)]

Welcome back, Ken!

John

Except for the word "whenever," this is largely true. Installation of
*most* programs adds entries to the registry.




Generally true, as above.




Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.




Also false.





Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html





Completely false, as above.

 

[Peter Foldes]

multiposted SPAM

 

[Twayne]

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT), "(e-mail address removed)"



Completely false. Having a larger registry does not affect speed.

Having to read so much as one singly byte of data takes time and if that
byte is new, it will require more cpu cycles and thus more time. When
you consider some programs can add tens of thousands of entries to a
registry, it certain can slow things down.

Haven't you EVER noticed how a virgin XP system is fast to boot and run,
but with each additional suite, etc., it boots slower and runs a tad
slower each time? Aren't you the MVP here who also says that boot times
in excess of 5 minutes are OK without having any idea what's loaded on a
system?

Also false.

No, actually very much possible.

On the rare occasions where it boils down to an unknown registry
problem, or the registry needs to be eiminated (or not) as the culprit,
a good cleaner is a very valuable tool.

Besides being spam, that's terrible advice. Registry cleaning programs
are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is
dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry
cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry
cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry
entries doesn't really hurt you.

At least you have it right that time. It's blatant spam and the only
correct response to it would have been to report it as such. But you
chose to drag out your ignorance and once again display it to the world
for all posterity to see. You have an engine out and cannot sustain
flight on the one that's left.

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.

Read http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html

Oh, here you go, another self serving spew to another unknown URL that
may or may not be safe and almost certainly contains misinformation
since it came from you. You have no credibility as it is; that sure
won't help you.

Completely false, as above.

No, it's not "completely false", but it is definitely unlikely. It's a
simple "grab" for the ensuing spam and nothing more. Of no more
importance than your saying and spamming your MVP status, which is
untraceable.

I thank you once more for the opportunity to read your entertaining
fish-leavings and to expose you for the ignorant, closed minded idiot
that you are.

Spam duly reported, something you are surely too lazy to bother with.

Twayne

 

[Twayne]

Welcome back, Ken!

Another untraceable MVP. Prove you're on the list.

 

[Unknown]

Your thinking is faulty. If a program indexes though a file, it doesn't run
any slower if the file is ten bytes or ten million bytes.

 

[nass]

LOL Peter, don't encourage him/her to post in the same group.

Multi or in a single NG it is SPAM

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

Welcome back, Ken!

Thanks, John. We had a great vacation.

 

[John John (MVP)]

What is your problem today?

John

Another untraceable MVP. Prove you're on the list.

 

[Twayne]

Your thinking is faulty. If a program indexes though a file, it
doesn't run any slower if the file is ten bytes or ten million bytes.

reading one byte takes x time. Reading ten million bytes takes
x,000,000 units. I said nothing about indexing through a file, knothead.
That's your own attempt to confuse with facts.

If an index marker goes through one byte, it takes x time. To index
through ten million bytes takes x,000,000 times. The actual time
required depends on the algorithm/s but in no way is ten vs a million
going to require the same number of machine cycles, straight slot.

How come you dropped the MVP you stuck after your name a few posts back?
Did I strike a nerve? Or wasn't I supposed to tie those together?
Phillips Head.

 

[Twayne]

LOL Peter, don't encourage him/her to post in the same group.

Multi or in a single NG it is SPAM

Besides, isn't the second rule of spam that spammers are stupid? If it
wasn't reported, it wasn't worth the ether to point out the obvious.

 

[Unknown]

You most certainly are confused. I have NEVER had an MVP after my name. AND,
you do NOT have to read THROUGH
hundreds of bytes if you add hundreds of bytes in a registry. Geeeeeeese
you're dense!

 

[mikeyhsd]

NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify postings.

least of all the original poser who will NEVER come back to check.

all you do is waste bandwidth and people's time.


GROW UP.

(e-mail address removed)



multiposted SPAM

 

[Unknown]

NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify Peters posts as a waste of bandwidth and peoples time..
NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify postings.

least of all the original poser who will NEVER come back to check.

all you do is waste bandwidth and people's time.


GROW UP.

(e-mail address removed)



multiposted SPAM

 

[Addison Steele]

NO ONE is impressed by your FEEBLE attempt to classify
Peters posts as a waste of bandwidth and peoples time..

And no one is impressed by your frequent replies telling people that
no one is impressed - or asking them who they are trying to impress.

Sheesh.

 

[Leonard Grey]

And no one is impressed by your post telling us that no one is impressed
by his post saying that no one is impressed.

Have I made an impression on anyone?

 

[Bill in Co.]

I just think Mikey likes to show off his animated name gif. But besides
that, probably not.

 

[Unknown]

Can you just imagine the billions of electrons wasted by Mikey? (bandwidth)

 

[Olórin]

I was impressed somewhere along the line, but I lost track of by whom...