B
Bill in Co.
We've covered some of the relative advantages and disadvantages of using
System Restore and ERUNT here before, but I have a specific question
relating to the usage of System Restore:
Since System Restore tries to keeps track of file and registry *changes* to
your system, and since these changes can really add up, the more you do
*between restore points* (especially for a large program), here is my
question:
Let's suppose you first create a restore point. And then you install a
program you want to try out. And then you decide you don't want that
program, and want to uninstall it *and* have the system returned to as clean
a state as it was before the installation (which means restoring the
previous registry, too, since any program "uninstallation" routines often
leave some things behind there).
So, is it really better to first uninstall the program *before* running
System Restore to the previous set point, OR to just leave the program
installed, and then let System Restore effectively "uninstall" it? In the
latter case, System Restore simply has to reverse *just the changes made
since installation*, and NOT the changes compounded by the original
installation and uninstallation scenario (and that's a lot more total
changes to accurately keep track of to try to reverse - and it may
overburden (and disable) System Restore.
System Restore and ERUNT here before, but I have a specific question
relating to the usage of System Restore:
Since System Restore tries to keeps track of file and registry *changes* to
your system, and since these changes can really add up, the more you do
*between restore points* (especially for a large program), here is my
question:
Let's suppose you first create a restore point. And then you install a
program you want to try out. And then you decide you don't want that
program, and want to uninstall it *and* have the system returned to as clean
a state as it was before the installation (which means restoring the
previous registry, too, since any program "uninstallation" routines often
leave some things behind there).
So, is it really better to first uninstall the program *before* running
System Restore to the previous set point, OR to just leave the program
installed, and then let System Restore effectively "uninstall" it? In the
latter case, System Restore simply has to reverse *just the changes made
since installation*, and NOT the changes compounded by the original
installation and uninstallation scenario (and that's a lot more total
changes to accurately keep track of to try to reverse - and it may
overburden (and disable) System Restore.