SQl 2000 job needs to run .NET code

[susiedba]

hey I want to execute VB 2005 code within a job in SQL 2000; all I see
there is 'ActiveX script'

is SQL 2000 going to support VB 2005 sometime soon?

if not, is there an IDE that supports ActiveX script development?

THANKS

Susie

 

[dbahooker]

yeah I've been wondering that also; I saw it working on one machine
once but I haven't seen it elsewhere

 

[RobinS]

Aaron and Aaron,

Do you just not have anything else to do with your life besides make posts
and respond to them yourself? It's really very sad.

Robin S.

 

[aaron.kempf]

give me an answer bitch

how do I use VB 2005 in my SQL 2000 DTS steps, or my SQL 2000 jobs? or
my SQL 2005 jobs?

grow some balls, wuss

Microsoft killed VB and you're too much of a pussy to 'demand
excellence'

-Aaron

 

[RobinS]

give me an answer bitch

how do I use VB 2005 in my SQL 2000 DTS steps, or my SQL 2000 jobs? or
my SQL 2005 jobs?

grow some balls, wuss

Microsoft killed VB and you're too much of a pussy to 'demand
excellence'

-Aaron

I manage to attain Excellence no matter what the tools are. It doesn't
matter how hard it is for me to provide a solution, it matters that my
customers are happy.

Robin S.
Ts'i mahnu uterna ot twan ot geifur hingts uto.

 

[dbahooker]

yeah I do also

unnecessary change is not sexy
unnecessary change is not necessary

my code is more portable than yours; and it works in a variety of
environments.

your code works in ONE PLACE-- either Vb 2005 or VB.net

-Aaron

 

[dbahooker]

why don't you give me an answer, robin

how do I use VB 2005 code in my SQL 2000 DTS steps, job steps, or even
SQL 2000 jobs?

lol

 

[aaron.kempf]

excellence?

your VB 2005 code doesn't work in either SQL 2000 or SQL 2005

so please tell me what to do with my VB 2005 code

thanks

 

[Larry Linson]

Yeah; I sure wish that SQL Server would support .NET in jobs and dts
steps

it would be nice to have a well-rounded product offering; sort of like
it was back in the VB6 / VBA / VBS days

-Larry

 

[punjab_tom]

UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT PRICE EFFICIENT
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT COST EFFICIENT
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT EFFICIENT
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT SEXY
UNNECESSARY CHANGE IS NOT NECESSARY

 

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

Now you're just having a conversation with 3 of your aliases. Split
personallity is a bitch.

 

[susiedba]

eat a panzer, whore

if you knew english well enough you might be able to get a visa and
come to a country with a future

**** europe, bitch

 

[dbahooker]

yes; I sure wish that we could run .NET code in SQL 2000 job steps


or even in SQL 2005

I mean; what a half-baked solution they tell us to move everyting
to .NET and yet 3/4s of where we use Vb6; there is no replacement