SPY BOT S&D vs MSspyware

[JohnPaulJones]

I ran MS SPYWARE which found no intrusions. Then I ran
SPY BOT S&D which came up with 3 intruders.

Is MS SPYWARE actually effective. Perhaps they should
have purchased SPT BOT S&D instead of GIANT.

Not only that, but there was a conflict with TURBO TAX and
MS SPYWARE would not load till I deleted that stupid
$19.95 program they had tacked on to drain more money from
my purse. Took two days to figure that out.

MS needs to research their product before they rush it to
we poor suckers!

If MS was doing the right thing they would get the bugs
out of their WINDOWS SYSTEMS before they put them on the
market and then protect themselves with the go/no contract
which one has to agree to in order to load the program.
What a bunch of crooks! In addition a working SPYWARE
program and working virus and firewall programs should be
part of WINDOWS. When you pay the exhorbitant price for
WINDOWS you should get a no non-sense program where
corrective downloads have to be made as soon as you
install the program. What a "scam!"

 

[Guest]

program and working virus and firewall programs should be

part of WINDOWS.

No thanks, I prefer to get my working virus programs the
old fashioned way. One download at a time, oh yeah!

 

[Mike T]

1. were the 3 things that Spybot picked up Cookies, since the MSAS beta is
not scanning cookies at this point that might explain the differences.

2. This is BETA software and is NOT being forced upon anyone. You choose to
download it and install it knowing that it was beta and that there might be
problems with it, the only one you should be blaming is yourself.

Mike