Spam Emails Send From My Account

S

Stephen Lo

My comp (WinXP Pro SP3 with all updates and hotfixes installed) was
infected by virus?/trojan?/malware?. Several(?) spam emails were send
from my PC on my email account. I have many (hundreds) bounced emails
with "why we need you"/"Award" as subject in my inbox due to delivery
delay/failure from my ISP's Mail Delivery System. I scanned my PC with
Eset NOD32, MBAM, (both with the most recent signature files) in safe
mode and found nothing suspicious. Also I scanned with a "BitDefender
Rescue CD" downloaded from
"http://www.askvg.com/download-free-...persky-bitdefender-avira-f-secure-and-others/"

found nothing. Spam mails were send as usual.

Everybody knows what infects my PC and how could i get rid of it?
Please help, thank you very much !!

BTW my firewall (Zone alarm pro) dose not report any unauthorized
internet outbound connection
 
B

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Stephen said:
.. I have many (hundreds) bounced emails with "why we need
you"/"Award" as subject in my inbox due to delivery delay/failure
from my ISP's Mail Delivery System.

Chances are that the spammer is merely using your email address in the
easily forged FROM field, and you are getting the bounces from non-valid
addresses he sent the spam to. Nothing uncommon about this; it's just
your day in the barrel.
 
F

FromTheRafters

Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
Chances are that the spammer is merely using your email address in the
easily forged FROM field, and you are getting the bounces from
non-valid
addresses he sent the spam to. Nothing uncommon about this; it's just
your day in the barrel.

If that were the case, why would the returns all be from "my ISP's Mail
Delivery System"?

Wouldn't they be various?
 
B

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

FromTheRafters said:
If that were the case, why would the returns all be from "my ISP's
Mail Delivery System"?

Wouldn't they be various?

We wouldn't know for sure until Stephen posts the full headers of one of
these returned mails. However, the most common reason is as I described.
 
F

FromTheRafters

Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
We wouldn't know for sure until Stephen posts the full headers of one
of
these returned mails. However, the most common reason is as I
described.

Yes, maybe Stephen only assumed it was all from his ISP.
 
1

1PW

My comp (WinXP Pro SP3 with all updates and hotfixes installed) was
infected by virus?/trojan?/malware?. Several(?) spam emails were send
from my PC on my email account. I have many (hundreds) bounced emails
with "why we need you"/"Award" as subject in my inbox due to delivery
delay/failure from my ISP's Mail Delivery System. I scanned my PC with
Eset NOD32, MBAM, (both with the most recent signature files) in safe
mode and found nothing suspicious. Also I scanned with a "BitDefender
Rescue CD" downloaded from
"http://www.askvg.com/download-free-...persky-bitdefender-avira-f-secure-and-others/"

found nothing. Spam mails were send as usual.

Everybody knows what infects my PC and how could i get rid of it?
Please help, thank you very much !!

BTW my firewall (Zone alarm pro) dose not report any unauthorized
internet outbound connection

Hello Stephen:

Not withstanding the fine advise you have already received, I would have
you update your Mozilla Thunderbird to the latest version. You are
probably two versions behind the latest security release.

It is not unthinkable that another computer system, within Shaw
Communications or another ISP, has been turned into a Spambot using your
system's identity.

The antimalware you have in use is excellent. Many users add
SUPERAntiSpyware (SAS) to their arsenal to work with MBAM.

If you understand that we would like to see all the headers from one of
the returned emails, please post it here.

Regards,

Pete
 
S

Stephen Lo

FromTheRafters said:
Yes, maybe Stephen only assumed it was all from his ISP.

Thank you very much for your replies.

Here is the email header and content from one of the bounce email:

From - Mon May 11 21:35:50 2009
X-Account-Key: account1
X-UIDL: 181960-1151302496
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 10000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:

Return-path: <>
Received: from pd3mr2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca
(pd3mr2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.178])
by l-daemon (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5
2006))
with ESMTP id <0KJI00CTQIX6Z770@l-daemon> for (e-mail address removed); Mon,
11 May 2009 21:56:05 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pd2mr-vip-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca (HELO idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca)
([10.0.141.22]) by pd3mr2so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; Mon,
11 May 2009 21:55:08 -0600
Received: from localhost by idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca; Mon,
11 May 2009 21:55:08 -0600
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:55:08 -0600
From: Mail Delivery System <[email protected]>
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: (e-mail address removed)
Message-id: <0KJI00CV1IXHZ770@l-daemon>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary=7COki.4QQyFbV8Z.7GVJ0.5cKPiMV
X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true
X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=ETskHGo9fuLnr-jVeRYA:9
a=mJSQPWL-eKYwdS4SdIOBMmnkzYIA:4 a=VVVTLAxAGPoA:10
a=Wt_uDfEW1PiiQ1VeBeEA:9
a=e7zKhY-EBQ1fYPN-L4-VY20qrt0A:4 a=FcCzd-_jAAAA:8 a=pnWOf_8l5tJNYNtgBMgA:9
a=l7MgAE-1gacHfr-TtJwA:7 a=G9uJFDbQNtCi4eZFJT0vpWrxVYgA:4
a=1YyWH2jasJIA:10
a=gpIh_FRFo58A:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=MOoU6_y5KB8A:10 a=Hc7mcz8ZAtwA:10
Original-recipient: rfc822;[email protected]

--7COki.4QQyFbV8Z.7GVJ0.5cKPiMV
content-type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The following message to <[email protected]> was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.4.7 - Delivery expired (message too old) 'timeout'



__________ NOD32 4065 (20090511) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com

--7COki.4QQyFbV8Z.7GVJ0.5cKPiMV
content-type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca

Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 5.4.7 - Delivery expired (message too old)
'timeout' (delivery attempts: 0)

--7COki.4QQyFbV8Z.7GVJ0.5cKPiMV
content-type: message/rfc822

Received: from pd2mr2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.109])
by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 08 May 2009 21:36:48 -0600
Received: from pd2mr2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.109])
by pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 08 May 2009 21:36:38 -0600
X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true
X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=FcCzd-_jAAAA:8
a=FSVeOMgW16kkxXAlQQUA:9 a=1kO2IQHRgmJ5dt6r-egA:7
a=m89S-sa0W5RNadnAWOS3-VLeOfcA:4 a=gpIh_FRFo58A:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10
a=Cbv64XCD1US6DH0LcTcA:7 a=UFlmGhmXJHba_l2nSjUnVx_qxW4A:4
a=xqWDZuK2HZkA:10 a=d3ZwFMNkyaEA:10
Received: from pd2mr-vip-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca (HELO pd2ms3so.prod.shaw.ca)
([10.0.141.22])
by pd2mr2so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 08 May 2009 21:36:38 -0600
Received: from shaw.ca (pd2ms3so-con.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.122.117])
by l-daemon (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5
2006))
with ESMTP id <0KJC007G8Y2JKV70@l-daemon> for (e-mail address removed);
Fri,
08 May 2009 21:37:31 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from [10.0.144.231] (Forwarded-For: [10.0.146.231])
by pd2ims2.prod.shaw.ca (mshttpd); Sat, 09 May 2009 04:37:31 +0100
Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 04:37:31 +0100
From: STEPHEN LO <[email protected]>
Subject: why we need you
Bcc:
Reply-to: (e-mail address removed)
Message-id: <[email protected]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--1412836a13c546932826
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

----1412836a13c546932826
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Dear,
My name is Eizo Kobayashi and I am the recruitment officer / C.E.O of
one of the biggest and most successful Textile, Machinery,Aerospace,
Electronics & Multimedia Energy, Metals & Minerals,Chemicals, Forest
Products &General Merchandise,Food ,Finance, Realty, Insurance
&Logistics Services for more info visit our website:www.itochu.co.jp .
I am contacting you because we are in need of a Payment Representative
in the United States,Canada,some part in Asia and Europe. So I would
like to offer you a part time job as our payment representative with
which you can earn twice your monthly salary depending on your Speed,
Accuracy and Devotion to your work. All you will be doing for us is to
receive our payment on our behalf from our client (which isalways in
form of Money Orders or Cashier Checks),Processthe payment and deduct
your commission which is going to beten percent (10%) of total amount
processed and remit thebalance to any of our offices via Electronic
Transfer.
WHY WE NEED YOU:
We need a representative because it takes a longer timeperiod cashing
checks that was sent from the USA to us inJapan because it take like a
month to clear the checks andsending someone over to the USA to collect
the checksusually consumes a lot of money so that why we are willingto
part with 10% of the total sum so that we can always getthe checks
cashed in a timely fashion since they are comingfrom the USA and Canada
and our representative would also bein the USA, Canada and Europe.
If interested please reply to this email: (e-mail address removed)
with the following information
Full Name:Address in full ( No Po Box )
City, State, Zipcode,
Phone Number/CELL PHONE NUMBER .
Have you recieve or done an offer like this indicate Yes or No?
If you are not Interested in this Offer do please disregard this mail
thank you.
Reply via E-mail: (e-mail address removed)

Best Regards,
Eizo Kobayashi
President
ITOCHU Coporation
www.itochu.co.jp

Please give me some advice, thank you !!
 
S

Stephen Lo

1PW said:
Hello Stephen:

Not withstanding the fine advise you have already received, I would have
you update your Mozilla Thunderbird to the latest version. You are
probably two versions behind the latest security release.

Thank you very much for your reply.
My Mozilla Thunderbird is version 2.0.0.21 (20090302), I think it is the
most updated version. When i checked for update it said there is no
update available.
It is not unthinkable that another computer system, within Shaw
Communications or another ISP, has been turned into a Spambot using your
system's identity.

The antimalware you have in use is excellent. Many users add
SUPERAntiSpyware (SAS) to their arsenal to work with MBAM.

If you understand that we would like to see all the headers from one of
the returned emails, please post it here.

Regards,

Pete

I just post the header and content from one of the bounced email prior
to this reply. Please give me some advice, Thank you !
 
B

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Stephen said:
Here is the email header and content from one of the bounce email:
<snip repost of email source>

I would say that, from the source you posted, the bounce was sent to you
from Shaw.

Looking at the copy of the outgoing mail included in the bounce, it does
look like the original email came from you - or at least a Shaw
subscriber. I don't see any sender's IP address in there (yours is
24.83.36.171), and there is no TO: line in the headers, which isn't
quite normal.

Do you have a router connected to your cable modem? When you aren't
doing anything, does there appear to be outgoing activity?

Look for rogue processes with this application:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Explorer
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
 
S

Stephen Lo

Beauregard said:
<snip repost of email source>

I would say that, from the source you posted, the bounce was sent to you
from Shaw.
Thank you very much for your time to analyze the header.
Looking at the copy of the outgoing mail included in the bounce, it does
look like the original email came from you - or at least a Shaw
subscriber. I don't see any sender's IP address in there (yours is
24.83.36.171), and there is no TO: line in the headers, which isn't
quite normal.

There is a line in the header of the original spam email:
"Received: from [10.0.144.231] (Forwarded-For: [10.0.146.231])
by pd2ims2.prod.shaw.ca (mshttpd); Sat, 09 May 2009 04:37:31 +0100"
Is "10.0.144.231" spammer's IP? It is same for all outgoing spam emails.
I tried "trace route" and "whois" on that IP but found nothing.
Do you have a router connected to your cable modem? When you aren't
doing anything, does there appear to be outgoing activity?

Yes I have a router (non wireless) in my system. There appear no
abnormal outgoing activety.

I used processEXP and also checked all processes in the task manager at
the first time i saw these delivery delay notices and found no rogue
processes. The spammer may utilize my email client and shut it down
after sending the spams.

As I could not identify any virus/trojan/malware I rolled back my C:
drive to the most recent healthy disk image created three days prior to
the accidence. It works, now no more delivery delay notice for 3 days.
It seems the spammer's program is successfully removed. I think i am
luck to have a healthy disk image, but i still hope that I may learn
more about this type of attack.

Anyway thanks to all who contributes help to my case.

Good luck everybody !!
 
J

Jim

Repy inline:
Stephen Lo said:
Beauregard said:
<snip repost of email source>

I would say that, from the source you posted, the bounce was sent to you
from Shaw.
Thank you very much for your time to analyze the header.
Looking at the copy of the outgoing mail included in the bounce, it does
look like the original email came from you - or at least a Shaw
subscriber. I don't see any sender's IP address in there (yours is
24.83.36.171), and there is no TO: line in the headers, which isn't
quite normal.

There is a line in the header of the original spam email:
"Received: from [10.0.144.231] (Forwarded-For: [10.0.146.231])
by pd2ims2.prod.shaw.ca (mshttpd); Sat, 09 May 2009 04:37:31 +0100"
Is "10.0.144.231" spammer's IP? It is same for all outgoing spam emails. I
tried "trace route" and "whois" on that IP but found nothing.
This address belongs to some organization's LAN (possibly Shaw). Addresses
10.x.x.x and 192.168.x.x are not routable.
Jim
 
B

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Stephen said:
Is "10.0.144.231" spammer's IP?

Jim answered that ... 10.nn... is an internal address.
I used processEXP and also checked all processes in the task manager
at the first time i saw these delivery delay notices and found no
rogue processes.

Oh you used it already? Good thinking. said:
The spammer may utilize my email client and shut it down after sending
the spams.

S'far as I know, none of the modern mass-mailing worms use *your* email
client. They all have their own built-in SMTP engine. The outbound
portion of the message you posted doesn't say the mail agent was
Thunderbird ... or Outlook Express ... or ...
As I could not identify any virus/trojan/malware I rolled back my C:
drive to the most recent healthy disk image created three days prior
to the accidence. It works, now no more delivery delay notice for 3
days. It seems the spammer's program is successfully removed. I think
i am luck to have a healthy disk image, but i still hope that I may
learn more about this type of attack.

Well. Let's hope that works. But keep a sharp eye on things. :)
See if you can figure out what you did to get it in the first place.
Anyway thanks to all who contributes help to my case.

Glad to help.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top