Slow Computer Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lameex
  • Start date Start date
L

Lameex

How can I speed up the performance of my computer? It is running terribly
slowly. Just so you know I do have about 5 svchost.exes running on it and I
think I remember someone telling me that that is a bad thing. I run McAfee
for my inernet security but I also have AdAware and Spybot. I think someone
told me that McAfee can be replaced byeither one of those. I've done the
restarts, defrags, and disk cleanups. Any other suggestions? HELP!?!?!??!?!
 
Lameex said:
How can I speed up the performance of my computer? It is running terribly
slowly. Just so you know I do have about 5 svchost.exes running on it and I
think I remember someone telling me that that is a bad thing. I run McAfee
for my inernet security but I also have AdAware and Spybot. I think someone
told me that McAfee can be replaced byeither one of those. I've done the
restarts, defrags, and disk cleanups. Any other suggestions? HELP!?!?!??!?!

Check to see if the disk is in PIO mode instead of DMA mode.

If WinXP detects CRC errors coming from the drive, it automatically
decreases the interface rate. If that happens enough times, you end
up running in PIO mode.

An application you can use for benchmarking, is HDTune 2.55 free edition.
It includes an information screen, which lists the current interface mode.

http://www.hdtune.com/download.html

*******

You can use CPUZ to review the operation of the CPU and memory.

http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php

If a processor uses EIST (SpeedStep) or CNQ (Cool N' Quiet), the
processor can be operated in a reduced speed while the system is
idle. You need a computing load, provided by a second program, to
ensure the processor is running at its top (rated) speed.

*******

You can use Task Manager, to review your RAM usage.

*******

If you use a DOS window ("Command Prompt" program), you can try

tasklist /svc

to list all the processes running. For each "svchost", that tool will
list all the things running inside the svchost.

HTH,
Paul
 
Lameex said:
How can I speed up the performance of my computer? It is running terribly
slowly. Just so you know I do have about 5 svchost.exes running on it and I
think I remember someone telling me that that is a bad thing. I run McAfee
for my internet security but I also have Ad Aware and Spybot. I think someone
told me that McAfee can be replaced by either one of those. I've done the
restarts, defrags, and disk cleanups. Any other suggestions? HELP!?!?!??!?!

Using the "winver" command, what is the detailed description of your OS?

I'm using a Windows system now with seven svchost.exe running.

McAfee /is/ a known resource hog - but, which McAfee product is your
system running? Ad Aware is not as good as it once was. MBAM & SAS
are the 'new' rising stars.

Have you used CCleaner for cleanup? Don't use its "Registry" tab.
You might find, through the use of Microsoft's optional "Process
Explorer" that a general housecleaning could be done with your startup
programs.

If your system utilizes one partition on your HDD, how much free space
is left where Windows resides?

If your system is an off-the-shelf model, what is its make & model?
If you know, what is the clock speed of your CPU? How much RAM is
installed?

Please use detailed interspersed answers and post a complete reply.
 
Lameex said:
How can I speed up the performance of my computer? It is running terribly
slowly. Just so you know I do have about 5 svchost.exes running on it and
I
think I remember someone telling me that that is a bad thing. I run McAfee
for my inernet security but I also have AdAware and Spybot. I think
someone
told me that McAfee can be replaced byeither one of those. I've done the
restarts, defrags, and disk cleanups. Any other suggestions?
HELP!?!?!??!?!

Whomever told you that 5 processes running svchost.exe is a bad thing knows
next to nothing. There are 7 processes running svchost.exe on this
computer.

Whomever told you that McAfee can be replaced with either or both of the
others is incorrect. I would replace McAfee with NOD32. I replaced AdAware
and Spybot with SAS and MBAM...

However, nobody can help much without knowing much more about your system.
You need to specify which version of XP, the service pack level, the amount
of RAM, the pagefile size, and disk mode (PIO or DMA). For example, if the
disk has every had excessive errors, the driver will revert to PIO and stay
that way forever. PIO mode is quite a bit slower than DMA.

Jim
 
Jim said:
Whomever told you that 5 processes running svchost.exe is a bad thing knows
[snip]

Whomever told you that McAfee can

It's "Whoever". Whomever would be correct if you started with
"Whomever you told..."
 
In 1PW typed on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:12:47 -0700:
... Ad Aware is not as good as it once was. MBAM & SAS
are the 'new' rising stars.

I dunno, Ad-Aware AE seems pretty nice to me.
 
Whomever told you that 5 processes running svchost.exe is a bad thing knows
next to nothing.  There are 7 processes running svchost.exe on this
computer.

Whomever told you that McAfee can be replaced with either or both of the
others is incorrect.  I would replace McAfee with NOD32.  I replaced AdAware
and Spybot with SAS and MBAM...

However, nobody can help much without knowing much more about your system..
You need to specify which version of XP, the service pack level, the amount
of RAM, the pagefile size, and disk mode (PIO or DMA).  For example, ifthe
disk has every had excessive errors, the driver will revert to PIO and stay
that way forever.  PIO mode is quite a bit slower than DMA.

Jim

The number of running svchost varies. Multiples are not indicative of
a problem. I have 10 (today, right now).

See here for the short version:

http://windowsxp.mvps.org/svchost.htm

And if you are curious to what is running under EACH svchost, get
Process Explorer.
 
How can I speed up the performance of my computer? It is running terribly
slowly. Just so you know I do have about 5 svchost.exes running on it and I
think I remember someone telling me that that is a bad thing.


That's not correct. Multiple copies are normal.

I run McAfee for my inernet security


McAfee is, in my view, next to the worst security software available;
only Norton is worse.

but I also have AdAware and Spybot. I think someone
told me that McAfee can be replaced byeither one of those.


That's not correct. Those are both anti-spyware programs (and neither
is among the best anti-spyware programs). You need both an anti-virus
program and (preferably two or more) anti-spyware programs.


I've done the
restarts, defrags, and disk cleanups. Any other suggestions? HELP!?!?!??!?!


I of course don't know for sure, but the most likely thing is that you
are infected with malware. Go to
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware and
follow the steps there.
 
BillW50 said:
In 1PW typed on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:12:47 -0700:

I dunno, Ad-Aware AE seems pretty nice to me.

Can we assume you're referring to version 7.1.0.11?

Yes Bill. It's difficult to quantify but Ad Aware lost much of its
following with their release of version 8. Coupled with the fact that
their database updates aren't nearly as frequent as other antispyware
providers has caused Ad Aware to loose some of its luster. Do we know
how much longer "AE" will be supported and viable?
 
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:31:39 -0500,
HELP!?!?!??!?!

I would suggest you to buy a new processor and
RAM.
Higher processing power and RAM leads to better performance.

You could try Core 2 Duo with 2-4 GB of RAM.


Not at all a good suggestion. Five points:

1. A faster processor means better performance, but whether someone
can install a faster processor depends on what motherboard he has.
Your recommendation of a specific processor is not a good one, since
he may be able to install it on his motherboard. Moreover, he may
already have such a processor.

2. How much RAM you need for good performance is *not* a
one-size-fits-all situation. You get good performance if the amount of
RAM you have keeps you from using the page file significantly, and
that depends on what apps you run. Most people running a typical range
of business applications find that somewhere around 512MB works well,
others need more. Almost anyone will see poor performance with less
than 256MB. Some people, particularly those doing things like editing
large photographic images, can see a performance boost by adding even
more than 512MB--sometimes much more.

If you are currently using the page file significantly, more memory
will decrease or eliminate that usage, and improve your performance.
If you are not using the page file significantly, more memory will do
nothing for you. Go to
http://billsway.com/notes_public/winxp_tweaks/ and download
WinXP-2K_Pagefile.zip and monitor your page file usage. That should
give you a good idea of whether more memory can help, and if so, how
much more.

So a recommendation that he have 2-4GB of RAM is a poor one if you
don't even know what apps he runs.

3. All 32-bit client versions of Windows (not just Vista/XP) have a
4GB address space (64-bit versions can use much more). That's the
theoretical upper limit beyond which you can not go.

But you can't use the entire 4GB of address space. Even though you
have a 4GB address space, you can only use *around* 3.1GB of RAM.
That's because some of that space is used by hardware and is not
available to the operating system and applications. The amount you can
use varies, depending on what hardware you have installed, but can
range from as little as 2GB to as much as 3.5GB. It's usually around
3.1GB.

Note that the hardware is using the address *space*, not the actual
RAM itself. If you have a greater amount of RAM, the rest of the RAM
goes unused because there is no address space to map it to.

So recommending that he install as much as 4GB when he can't use it
all is a poor one, since if he installs that much he will waste money.

4. It isn't entirely clear from his message, but my guess as to what
he means is that his performance has recently degraded. If that's the
case, his solution is *not* upgrading his hardware, and no
recommendation to upgrade hardware should be made without first
ascertaining whether performance has degraded for no apparent reason.

5. It's of course not *always* true, but the great majority of time,
when someone experiences performance degradation these days, it's the
result of malware infection.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Slow Computer Performance 29
Slow Performance 3
Suspicious file problem 7
windows running slow 6
XP slow to load programs 8
very slow performance 7
mouse moving and closing out programs 5
Slow Computer 7

Back
Top